Critics’ reviews

The Battle of Algiers (1966)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 95: 6 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Battle of Algiers

95
Positive
6
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The consensus is strongly positive, with praise centred on Pontecorvo’s documentary-like reconstruction and the force of its political drama. Critics repeatedly single out the newsreel-style photography, the sense of events unfolding rather than being staged, and the attention to individuals within the uprising. The reviews also agree that its depictions of violence on both sides create compassion without softening the brutality, while its suspense makes the political detail gripping rather than dutiful.

There is little substantive dissent in these accounts, and no recurring reservation emerges. The differences concern how critics describe the film’s political stance: Radio Times stresses its refusal to condemn or condone, while Film Comment emphasises clear sympathies alongside an unromanticised account of resistance and escalation. Some reviews foreground the reconstruction’s realism; others place greater weight on its analysis of urban revolt and the human cost of repression.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · David Parkinson
100

The critic describes it as a stark and compelling drama and compassionate masterpiece of political analysis with much contemporary resonance. Its strengths include a cinéma-vérité approach that refuses to condemn or condone while balancing aggression with terrorism and depicting honorable individuals on both sides.

Read the full review →
Time Out
8 May 2007 · ★★★★★ · Dave Calhoun
100

The critic finds Pontecorvo’s stirring anatomy of an urban uprising strikingly relevant today and superb and unrivalled. It effectively moulds political commentary with drama through its mournful tone, journalistic approach and intimate details amid grand-scale reconstruction.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· Michael Brooke
95*

The critic calls it unquestionably the greatest political film ever made. It is riveting as a suspense thriller and rigorously clear-eyed in its presentation of atrocities committed by both sides, with uncanny relevance to how terrorist cells operate.

Read the full review →
Empire
27 April 2007 · David Parkinson
90*

The critic hails the film as a technical and dramatic masterclass that retains its power to shock and provoke long after its original release. Pontecorvo's neo-realistic approach, with its non-professional cast and newsreel-like style, is singled out for creating genuine compassion amid depictions of violence on both sides.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· Mark Harris

The critic highlights the film's enduring status as a radical, documentary-style depiction of colonial revolt and urban guerrilla tactics that resonated with 1960s radicals. Pontecorvo is praised for balancing clear sympathies with an unromanticized, blunt portrayal of violence and escalation in resistance movements.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
30 May 1968 · Roger Ebert

Pontecorvo's film is a great, deeply realistic reconstruction of the Algerian struggle that succeeds in feeling like actual events. It is passionate yet neutral, showing the cost of violence and torture on both sides with universal relevance.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
1 July 2012 · Glenn Heath Jr.

The critic calls it great protest art and possibly the greatest film on insurrection, praising its hybrid documentary-narrative realism that captures the Algerian fight for independence with stirring detail and evenhandedness toward both sides' tactics and atrocities.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
16 September 1967 · Brendan Gill

Pontecorvo's film is the best of its kind, a brilliantly convincing reconstruction charged with authentic strong emotion and a redeeming purity of intention. It tells a tragic story of murder, torture and retribution on both sides while doing justice to history and art.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
21 September 1967 · Bosley Crowther

The film is an uncommonly dynamic and gripping re-enactment of the Algerian rebellion against the French, with extraordinary photographic virtuosity that makes it look like authentic documentary footage. It stands out for its literal and naturalistic account of intra-urban guerrilla warfare.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1965 · festival review

The film is a graphic, straightforward, realistic re-enactment of events leading to Algerian independence, the first feature made in Algiers by Algerians with Italian talent. It is a dedicated effort with importance as a document, blending restaged scenes with newsreel clips for authentic flavor.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
11 May 2007 · Jennie Kermode
90*

The critic describes it as an unforgettable, absorbing and hard-hitting piece of cinema that provides a balanced and accurate account of the Algerian revolution, praising its lush black and white photography and score while noting its powerful message about the horror of suffering on both sides.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
6 July 2012 · ★★★★½ · Rob Keeling
90

The critic praises the film's powerful and objective depiction of the Algerian struggle for independence, highlighting its realistic portrayal of violence on both sides and its lasting relevance. They single out the balanced account and the immersive, documentary-like style for praise.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate