Critics’ reviews

The Big Lebowski (1998)

11 reviews from 11 publications. We need six from publications we count before we show a critics’ score; there are 4 so far.

Back to our review of The Big Lebowski

4 of 6
Positive
3
Mixed
0
Negative
1
Empire
1 May 1998 · ★★★★★ · Ian Nathan
100

The critic praises the Coen brothers' inventive, peculiar film as a perfect fusion of noir pastiche, rich characters, and visual flair, with Jeff Bridges perfectly cast as the Dude. It highlights the film's soulful take on human goodness amid the comedy and chaos.

Read the full review →
Total Film
24 April 1998
90*

The review calls the film magnificent and the Coens' finest, noting its accessible blend of film literacy, real characters, and fun mystery elements centered on the Dude. It singles out the technical glitter, memorable supporting turns like John Turturro's Jesus, and overall joyful unpredictability.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
16 March 1998 · Daphne Merkin
40*

The critic finds the Coens reverted to cynical disengagement after Fargo, resulting in a smart but sterile exercise drenched in knowingness with nothing at stake. It praises the cast performances and camera work but faults the lack of real emotional connection or darkness.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
6 March 1998 · Roger Ebert

The critic describes it as a genial, shambling comedy about a human train wreck that should come with a warning against seeking a plot. It is weirdly engaging like its hero the Dude, with praise for the peculiar characters, dialogue, and inventive style including hallucinations and a Busby Berkeley-inspired sequence.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· Jonathan Romney

The critic praises the Coens' playful, non-sequitur-filled neo-Chandlerian detective story as a heroic act of slacker cinema that defiantly stays inconsequential and gleefully pursues its own amusement.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
24 April 1998

The critic laughs a great deal at the Coens' loose, meandering follow-up to Fargo but finds it ultimately unsatisfactory and structureless, a bag of ideas that spills out at random and will win no prizes. The bowling-alley scenes and supporting turns from Goodman and Turturro are singled out as highlights amid the fantasy sequences and narrative incoherence.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
20 January 1998 · Duane Byrge

The Coens deliver a deliriously fractured comedy about a deadbeat L.A. loafer that should appeal to select audiences and some mainstream viewers. It stands out for its screwy textures, performances (especially John Goodman), music, and overall rancid enjoyment.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
6 March 1998 · NYT Critic’s Pick · Janet Maslin

The critic portrays the film as a funny, cool-headed comedy where the Dude maintains his enviable composure amid nonstop Coen brothers chaos. It singles out the eclectic soundtrack and the gleefully demented appearance of John Turturro’s Jesus Quintana for praise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
18 June 2012 · GA

The critic calls the film immensely inventive and entertaining, a prime example of the Coens' stylistic brilliance that is actually about something meaningful like friendship and manhood in its time and place.

Read the full review →
Variety
19 January 1998 · festival review · Todd McCarthy

The critic notes it is spiked with wonderfully funny sequences and original notions but adds up to less than the sum of its parts because the film is about nothing other than its own cleverness. It praises the cast, technical work, and soundtrack while calling the overall reception likely mixed.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
19 February 2013 · ★★★★ · Tony Sokol
80

The critic praises the film's creation of a unique 'Lebowskiverse' with memorable characters and the Dude's Zen-like approach to chaos, highlighting Jeff Bridges' performance and the Coens' style. He notes its enduring appeal despite initial mixed reviews.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate