Critics’ reviews

The Big Sleep (1946)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 83: 12 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Big Sleep

83
Positive
12
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are uniformly positive about The Big Sleep, with praise clustering around Bogart and Bacall’s chemistry and the sharp dialogue that gives their exchanges such charge. Most critics treat the detective story as secondary to the pleasure of watching these characters spar. Hawks’ direction also earns credit for sustaining suspense through individual scenes, while the supporting cast and lively women characters give the film interest beyond its central pairing.

The differences concern how much the tangled plotting matters. Eye for Film finds the structure unsatisfying and the events difficult to pin down, despite the energy and performances. Empire has reservations about its effectiveness as a Chandler adaptation. Time Out, by contrast, treats the dreamlike confusion as part of the attraction. The spread is therefore one of enthusiasm rather than outright dissent: critics agree on the pleasures, but differ over whether narrative confusion enriches them or is simply worth tolerating.

Time Out
27 December 2010 · ★★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
100

The review celebrates the film's tangled, dreamlike plot and crackling dialogue as a high point of Hollywood cinema, noting its subversive take on romance, violence and female sexuality. It praises the chemistry between Bogart and Bacall and the way Hawks uses the story as an excuse for memorable scenes and sharp wit.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
22 June 1997 · Roger Ebert
95*

The critic celebrates the 1946 version as a great film noir whose witty, quotable dialogue and Bogart-Bacall chemistry make it enduringly popular despite its convoluted plot. He singles out the reshot scenes that enhanced the romantic banter and insolence between the leads.

Read the full review →
Empire
28 April 2006 · Kim Newman
85*

The film is less effective as a Chandler adaptation than some but remains a classic, wholly lovable movie; the critic praises its deployment of a picturesque supporting cast and visual/verbal pleasures over plot coherence.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· John Pym
85*

The critic praises the film's ability to sustain an illusion of suspense and its memorable set-piece episodes despite the famously convoluted plot. It highlights the vivacious Hawksian women characters and the witty, literate dialogue as key strengths that have helped the film endure.

Read the full review →
The Independent
2 August 1995
80*

The critic highlights the re-release of the 1946 film in a sharp new print, praising the crackling dialogue between Bogart and Bacall that creates sparks and obscures the convoluted plot.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1945 · Variety Staff
80*

The review praises Howard Hawks' direction for transferring Chandler's brittle characters to the screen with punch and providing a full load of rough, tense action. It highlights the smooth teaming of Bogart and Bacall along with the staccato pace and lusty romantic and physical action.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
75*

In a glowing new print the film looks cooler than ever; the critic singles out the sizzling chemistry and sparring between Bogart and Bacall while noting the plot's double-crosses are best ignored.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
15 August 2014 · Max O'Connell
70*

The piece presents Howard Hawks' 1946 adaptation as a classic example of the director's style and the Bogart-Bacall pairing. It highlights the film's witty dialogue and sexual tension as standout elements in a retrospective discussion.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
23 December 2010 · Peter Bradshaw
70*

The critic finds the re-released Howard Hawks classic a head-spinning, occult-feeling thriller whose plot demands fierce concentration and now resembles a David Lynch fable. He singles out the witty, charged dialogue and unmatched screen chemistry between Bogart and Bacall for praise.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
23 August 2019 · David Crow
90*

The critic calls The Big Sleep a timeless classic and masterpiece of style, crediting Hawks' sharp dialogue and the irresistible cool of Bogart and Bacall's pairing. The review emphasizes that the famously convoluted plot is secondary to the film's witty banter and star chemistry.

Read the full review →
Paste
15 February 2024
90*

The critic ranks The Big Sleep as the best Bogart-Bacall collaboration. The film's convoluted plot and production troubles, including reshoots to emphasize the stars' chemistry, ultimately enhance its enigmatic and dynamic qualities rather than detract from them.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
30 December 2010 · ★★★★ · Jennie Kermode
80

The critic praises the film's energy, witty script, and the chemistry between Bogart and Bacall, but notes it is structurally unsatisfying due to convoluted plotting and leaves the viewer unsure of the events. They single out the character-driven nature and Bogart's performance for keeping the audience engaged.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate