Critics’ reviews

The Blair Witch Project (1999)

8 reviews from 8 publications. We need six from publications we count before we show a critics’ score; there are 3 so far.

Back to our review of The Blair Witch Project

3 of 6
Positive
3
Mixed
0
Negative
0
The Guardian
22 October 1999 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

The critic finds the film a remarkably effective ghost story that evokes fear through darkness and shadows alone, presenting witchcraft as a contemporary evil. It singles out the convincing improvised performances of the three leads as they descend into panic in the woods.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
80*

The film creates genuine terror through minimal means and a found-footage format, building panic effectively with disturbing details and raw performances. It has rough edges and improvised dialogue but stands as an object lesson in low-budget horror.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
16 July 1999 · Kevin Thomas

The film is a clever, entertaining stunt and a terrific calling card for its fledgling filmmakers. It is more amusing and satisfying as a cautionary tale deflating a certain kind of filmmaking arrogance than as an offbeat horror show.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· Charles Taylor

The critic celebrates the film's box-office success and its ability to terrify with minimal resources and a flat, handheld-video style that replicates reality. The review notes the shrewd marketing campaign that fuelled its phenomenon status.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
19 August 2001 · Ed Gonzalez

The critic praises the film as a riveting and terrifying study of fear and a chilling reminder of the inscrutability of myth. It singles out the evocation of myths refusing comprehension as most remarkable, despite so little happening on screen.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
14 July 1999 · Janet Maslin

The film is a nifty example of how to make something out of nothing but imagination and an enterprising game plan. It skillfully spins a mythology and cult status out of thin air with no easy formulas.

Read the full review →
Time Out
25 April 2012 · TCh

The film is praised as back-to-basics horror that defies genre conventions, with the video-diary form creating infectious dread through the actors' performances and evocative sound design that lingers after viewing.

Read the full review →
Collider
25 October 2022 · B+ · Isabella Soares
83

The critic praises the film's revolutionary low-budget approach that creates a believable reality-driven horror scenario through found footage, tricking viewers effectively. However, notes a rushed ending and pacing issues that prevent it from being perfect.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate