Critics’ reviews

The Crucible (1996)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 62: 3 positive, 2 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of The Crucible

62
Positive
3
Mixed
2
Negative
2

The reviews lean positive but not strongly, and the split is wide. Most critics agree that the film is a faithful, serious piece of work and that Paul Scofield is its chief reason to watch: his judge is named as the standout even by the critics who dislike the film around him. Winona Ryder draws praise from more than one quarter, and Daniel Day-Lewis, Joan Allen and the cinematography are singled out by those who rate it highest.

Where the critics part is over what the move from stage to screen has cost. Even the warmest notice, from Empire, concedes that opening the play out loses some of its claustrophobia. Variety goes further, finding the adaptation stirring in places but unconvincing at its climax, and the Los Angeles Times finds it too frantic and schematic to involve, reserving its approval for the quieter scenes with Scofield. The spread runs from near-rave to outright dismissal, with little settled in the middle.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Phil Thomas
85*

The critic calls it an almost perfect adaptation, though opening up the play loses some of its claustrophobia. They single out Paul Scofield’s mesmerizing performance as the film’s standout.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Jason Caro
80

Caro says the play is brilliantly brought to the screen. He singles out Winona Ryder’s performance and Paul Scofield’s commanding presence as the film’s dramatic highlights.

Read the full review →
Total Film
21 February 1997 · ★★★★ · Total Film
80

The review calls the film an enthralling, fine drama and a superb adaptation, though it may not appeal to everyone. It praises the performances, especially Winona Ryder, Daniel Day-Lewis, and Joan Allen, as well as the cinematography.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page did not load, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. No praise or complaint from the review is available.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but the review text is unavailable. Its verdict and any specific praise or criticism cannot be determined.

Read the full review →
Variety
3 November 1996 · Todd McCarthy
35*

McCarthy finds the adaptation emotionally stirring but diminished in impact and ultimately unconvincing. He singles out Paul Scofield’s commanding performance as the standout, while criticizing the film’s failure to make its climactic spiritual transformation persuasive.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
13 December 1996 · Kenneth Turan
25*

Turan finds the film too frantic and schematic to be involving, despite its powerful credentials. He singles out Paul Scofield’s dignified performance and the quieter scenes with him for praise.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate