Critics’ reviews

The Crying Game (1992)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 81: 8 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Crying Game

81
Positive
8
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Neil Jordan’s blend of political thriller and romantic drama, praising its careful construction and willingness to take emotional risks. The screenplay draws particular admiration for bringing loyalty, violence and desire into a story that remains involving as its concerns grow more complicated. Praise also clusters around the performances, especially Stephen Rea’s troubled Fergus, with Jaye Davidson singled out for a strong contribution. Several reviews find Jordan’s handling of difficult feelings both persuasive and moving.

The reservations concern how securely the plotting supports those ambitions. Time Out offers the clearest dissent, finding structural weaknesses and too much reliance on twists, while still valuing the film’s treatment of its central themes. Empire questions some accents and aspects of the premise; Eye for Film finds Miranda Richardson’s performance weaker than the surrounding work. The spread is otherwise fairly narrow: even the more qualified responses credit Jordan’s daring and skill.

The New York Times
4 December 1992 · Janet Maslin
90*

Neil Jordan's romantic thriller is a brilliant original that expands a simple suspense story into a dizzying exploration of sex, loyalty, betrayal and unexpected love. It is beautifully acted and directed with both passion and precision.

Read the full review →
Variety
11 September 1992 · festival review · Todd McCarthy
90*

An astonishingly good and daring film that richly develops several intertwined thematic lines, taking giant risks that are stunningly rewarded. Jordan's seventh film is his best, a work that will mesmerize discriminating viewers with its skillful writing and structure.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
25 November 1992 · Kenneth Turan
85*

This offbeat emotional thriller is an unusually satisfying film, intricately constructed, surely directed and splendidly acted. Jordan's script combines spontaneity with careful planning, mixing politics with affairs of the heart in an unexpected way.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
9 November 1992 · Terrence Rafferty
85*

Jordan tells the story of a troubled IRA gunman who undergoes an emotional metamorphosis, making the hero's change of heart moving and persuasive. The film is a splendid entertainment that takes ideas to the limit and gives coherence to complex emotional states.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Barry McIlheney
80*

The review praises the film's haunting quality, harrowing screenplay and Stephen Rea's performance as Fergus, noting it dares to say something with wit and flair despite some flaws like accents and premise issues. It singles out the treatment of Northern Ireland and adult sexuality taboos as elevating it to a rare gem.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · John Ferguson
80

This offbeat blend of romantic drama and political thriller became a hit and won an Oscar for its screenplay; it is anchored by strong performances, especially from Stephen Rea as the guilt-ridden IRA man and Jaye Davidson as his love interest.

Read the full review →
The Independent
30 October 1992 · Adam Mars-Jones
70*

The critic finds the film a confident return to form for Jordan, blending political thriller, love story and meditation on sexual identity with skillful pacing and staging despite production troubles. It ends on an ambiguous note that may not fully convince all viewers but still deserves celebration for its daring.

Read the full review →
Time Out
18 May 2016 · GA
65*

The thriller has structural issues and relies too heavily on twists, but it holds together and effectively explores themes of loyalty, violence, and desire as a summation of the director's recurring interests.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
15 May 2009 · Jennie Kermode
80*

The critic praises the film's ahead-of-its-time humanity in portraying trans issues and the touching connection between two lonely, displaced characters, while noting it works as a solid thriller with wit and grit. Miranda Richardson's performance is singled out as a weak spot.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate