
Most critics find The Dark Knight Rises a satisfying close to Nolan’s Batman trilogy, praising its ambition, large-scale action and strong ensemble. Anne Hathaway’s Selina Kyle attracts particularly consistent approval for bringing wit and energy to a solemn film. The reviews also favour the physical spectacle and detailed cityscapes, even when the storytelling proves less convincing. For many, the connections to the earlier films give the conclusion welcome emotional weight.
Reservations centre on the crowded plotting, length and heavy dialogue, with several critics finding too little feeling beneath the action. There is less agreement about Bane, the clarity of the action sequences and whether Nolan’s seriousness becomes self-importance. The spread is wide: The Hollywood Reporter praises the lucid storytelling and ranks it above its predecessors, while The New Yorker finds it murky and interminable, with Hathaway providing the principal relief. Even favourable reviews often acknowledge that the film struggles to manage its many characters and ideas.
H
The Hollywood Reporter
15 July 2012 · Todd McCarthy
90*
The critic calls it big-time Hollywood filmmaking at its most massively accomplished and the best of Nolan’s Batman trilogy. He singles out the realistic dramatic events, lucid storytelling, and opulent production values for particular praise.
Read the full review →E
Empire
16 July 2012 · William Thomas
80*
It is a satisfying conclusion to the best superhero series, with unprecedented scale in spectacle and emotion, strong intimate moments, and superb supporting turns like Hathaway's Selina Kyle, though it lacks some of the earlier films' surprise or anarchy.
Read the full review →L
Little White Lies
20 July 2012 · 4/4/4 · Adam Woodward
80
Christopher Nolan’s baroque opus is a worthy trilogy closer, both seriously epic and epically serious. It is an immaculately crafted, fatally clinical last hurrah dotted with dazzling set pieces and a relentless percussive score, though it lacks a true emotional hook.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
★★★★ · Jeremy Aspinall
80
Nolan concludes his Batman franchise with another ambitious epic that sees the caped crime-fighter taken to hell and back, featuring superb set pieces and terrific performances. The long haul occasionally sags under too many plot strands, but breathtaking action and directorial ambition make it unmatched for mood and quality.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
30 December 2012
70*
Nolan brings solemnity and humourlessness to the franchise, turning Batman into a grave myth of a tortured saviour; the film features strong action and a murky political context but is weighed down by excessive dialogue and over-determined plotting.
Read the full review →Stirring in its broad strokes but shakier in its handling of character and story nuances, the film doesn’t lack ambition or vision yet is the first in the series not to smoothly execute its grand aspirations. It suffers from a glut of new characters but is helped by Nolan’s insistence on emotional resonance over mindless spectacle and a satisfying thematic through-line.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
18 July 2012 · Nick Schager
70*
The critic describes it as a grand but scattered blockbuster whose thematic ambitions and mammoth set pieces are undercut by narrative muddle and a less mesmeric villain than the Joker. He singles out the IMAX-enhanced action sequences and strong supporting performances, especially from Hathaway and Gordon-Levitt, for praise.
Read the full review →V
Vulture
20 July 2012 · David Edelstein
70*
The critic finds the film reasonably compelling as a big, ambitious close to the trilogy but notes it is overly long with spatial incoherence in action sequences and a letdown coda. He singles out Anne Hathaway’s witty, charismatic performance as Selina Kyle for praise.
Read the full review →I
The Independent
21 July 2012 · ★★★ · Geoffrey MacNab
60
The film delivers glum verbosity and thunderous action in Nolan's characteristically solemn style, but benefits from physical seriousness, solid casting, and a satisfying connection to the trilogy's start, with Hathaway providing welcome levity.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
12 July 2012 · ★★★
60
The sprawling epic is stuffed with side characters, subplots and diversions, skewing toward grandstanding action over emotional resonance. When the action sequences hum with real crowd scenes and massive cityscapes, however, it delivers an impressive, imaginative conclusion to the trilogy.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
23 July 2012 · Anthony Lane
30*
The critic calls the film murky, interminable and self-important with poor sound and dialogue, redeemed only by Anne Hathaway's lively Catwoman performance.
Read the full review →F
Film Comment
18 July 2012 · Scott Foundas
The critic praises Nolan's ambitious conclusion to the trilogy as a magisterial epic that deepens the story and delivers one of the great sustained action sequences in American cinema. He singles out the film's commitment to shooting on film and IMAX for its rich cinematic images and the spellbinding climax as a highlight.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
19 July 2012 · Kenneth Turan
The critic deems the film potent, persuasive and masterful filmmaking overall, highlighting its bleak tone, terrifying villain and contemporary societal themes.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
19 July 2012 · Peter Bradshaw
The critic finds the film a big, brash, epic-scale superhero movie with Wagnerian confidence from Nolan, praising the wounded maturity of Bale's performance, Gordon-Levitt's terrific turn as Blake, Caine's heartfelt Alfred and Hathaway's Catwoman. Bane disappoints due to indistinct voice and lack of a satisfying cerebral duel with Batman, and the absence of Ledger's Joker charisma is sorely felt.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
20 July 2012 · Critic's Pick · Manohla Dargis
The critic finds the film a grave and satisfying finish to Nolan's Batman trilogy, with strong performances and coherent action that shifts focus from a lone hero to collective hope.
Read the full review →T
The Telegraph
19 July 2012 · Robbie Collin
The critic sees the film as going further than most superhero movies, with Nolan directing a tale where Batman is often absent and the story focuses as much on everyman figures like Blake. It builds to a ferociously satisfying climax with a nuclear payload of catharsis after a bravura final act.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
18 July 2012 · ★★★★ · Simon Brew
80
The critic finds the film very good as a standalone and even better as a trilogy conclusion, with strong ensemble drama, ambitious storytelling, and impressive action and visuals. He singles out the commitment to physical effects, detailed Gotham cityscapes, and how it ties strands together for a satisfying endpoint.
Read the full review →The film offers plenty of thrills and lives up to Nolan's standards but lacks the groundbreaking innovation of its predecessors. Anne Hathaway's Selina Kyle is singled out as stealing the show with her dangerous and sophisticated performance.
Read the full review →/
/Film
17 July 2012 · 7/10 · David Chen
70
The critic describes the film as a storytelling mess overloaded with ideas but praises its visual spectacle, scale, and performances, particularly Tom Hardy's Bane.
Read the full review →C
Collider
19 July 2012 · C · Matt Goldberg
57
The film is an intense, epic conclusion to the trilogy with terrific performances, exhilarating action, and thoughtful ideas, but it sidelines Batman in favor of a large ensemble, socio-political themes, and spectacle. The first act is clunky, the emotional core is weak, and the story feels more like a function than a hero's journey, though IMAX action and Hathaway's Catwoman stand out.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate