Critics’ reviews

The Day of the Jackal (1973)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 69: 5 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Day of the Jackal

69
Positive
5
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics regard The Day of the Jackal as a successful procedural thriller, with praise centred on Fred Zinnemann’s patient direction and Edward Fox’s controlled performance as the assassin. The reviews repeatedly note the attention to planning, investigation and practical detail, which gives the pursuit its steady momentum. Fox’s coldness is a particular strength for several critics, while the methodical pacing and documentary-like approach draw much of the admiration.

The spread is wide, however, ranging from strong enthusiasm to doubts about whether the premise can sustain suspense. Historical foreknowledge is a recurring concern, though several critics find the film absorbing despite it. Some describe its appeal as more intellectual than emotional. Time Out offers the clearest dissent, questioning its documentary conviction and political depth while acknowledging some tension in the contrast between the assassin’s adaptability and the security services’ bureaucracy.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · David Parkinson
100

A magnificent script and masterly central performance from Edward Fox underpin this compelling adaptation, but it is Zinnemann's matchless direction that elevates it into an object lesson in suspense. The superb pacing methodically builds detail across Europe with atmospheric precision and an outstanding supporting cast.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
90*

The film is an outstanding procedural thriller built with Swiss-watch precision around the cold planning of Edward Fox’s charismatic assassin and the diligent investigation opposing him. Zinnemann roots the audience for the Jackal while exposing the moral ambiguities and the documentary-like realism of its execution.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
1 October 2018 · Jake Cole
70*

The critic calls it a foundational text for modern thrillers whose precise, process-driven style prefigures films by Michael Mann and David Fincher. Edward Fox’s dead-eyed, emotionless portrayal of the assassin is singled out as influential, replacing political rage with nihilism.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
17 May 1973 · Vincent Canby
70*

Zinnemann's thoroughly competent film version is cool, sober and geographically stunning, playing the material straight where Hitchcock might have made it funny. The suspense depends on wondering how the assassin will fail, given historical foreknowledge.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1972 · Variety Staff
70*

The film is a patient, studied and quasi-documentary translation of the novel that appeals more to the intellect than the senses. It succeeds in maintaining interest and suspense despite foreknowledge of the outcome, with strong work from Edward Fox as the meticulous assassin.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
26 May 1973 · Penelope Gilliatt
50*

The review pairs the film with another release in a Current Cinema column. It covers Zinnemann's adaptation starring Edward Fox as the assassin.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · PT
30*

The adaptation is inherently suspenseless given historical knowledge of de Gaulle's survival, but builds some tension through the contrast between the cold, chameleonic assassin and the bureaucratic French security efforts. It lacks documentary conviction and political depth but offers an intriguing exercise in procedural concealment.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate