Critics’ reviews

The Dead Zone (1983)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 79: 5 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Dead Zone

79
Positive
5
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to The Dead Zone, with praise centred on Christopher Walken’s performance and Cronenberg’s restrained handling of the supernatural premise. Walken’s isolation and vulnerability give the psychic story a believable human centre, while the direction keeps sensational material from overwhelming the character’s predicament. The reviews repeatedly stress the film’s emotional restraint, atmosphere and concern with loneliness. Several regard it as a particularly successful Stephen King adaptation because it gives the characters as much attention as the terror.

The differences concern structure and emotional temperature rather than any broad rejection of the film. The AV Club finds an icy detachment that strengthens the unease, while Slant Magazine emphasises the warmth beneath the isolation. Time Out offers the clearest reservation: the individual plot strands do not fully cohere, despite the craftsmanship and Walken’s arresting presence. The consensus is firmly positive, with that concern about episodic storytelling the main qualification.

RogerEbert.com
26 October 1983 · Roger Ebert
85*

The film makes viewers forget its supernatural elements by focusing on sympathetic, believable characters and the pathos of the protagonist's situation. Cronenberg and Walken create three-dimensional characters in a happy collaboration that stands out among Stephen King adaptations.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 September 2014 · Nick Schager
85*

The film is a rare Stephen King adaptation that effectively captures inexplicable terror and stands as one of Cronenberg’s most straightforward early works. It benefits from Walken’s alienated performance and an icy directorial detachment that heightens its haunting quality and themes of mortality.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
23 October 2006 · Eric Henderson
80*

Cronenberg’s adaptation is one of his most emotionally warm films while maintaining a sense of isolation and loneliness. The director prunes sensational elements from the source to focus on the protagonist’s tragic inability to alter his own life.

Read the full review →
Empire
28 April 2006 · Kim Newman
75*

The film is a step towards the mainstream for Cronenberg but still delivers powerful material from the Stephen King source. It is praised for its underplayed emotion and strong performances, especially Christopher Walken's signature role as the alienated psychic and Brooke Adams as his former love.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TCh
65*

Cronenberg's adaptation is well crafted and atmospheric with an arresting central performance from Walken, but the episodic plot strands do not fully mesh. It succeeds overall yet feels like a film in search of a TV series.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1982 · ** · Variety Staff

Cronenberg turns the material into an accomplished psychological thriller with Christopher Walken's convincing performance as the teacher with second sight. The film packs a lot into its runtime with effective handling of the psychic premise and supporting cast.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
21 February 2015 · Ryan Lambie
85*

The critic praises it as one of the best Stephen King adaptations, noting Cronenberg's restrained direction and Christopher Walken's haunting performance as the psychic Johnny Smith.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate