The reviews lean warm, and the praise gathers almost entirely around Ralph Fiennes and Carey Mulligan. Most critics see the alliance between a self-taught archaeologist and a wealthy widow as the film’s heart, and several remark on how much feeling the two convey without saying it aloud. The Suffolk landscape, shot with a widescreen sweep, earns steady credit, and the film’s gentle, unhurried handling of time and mortality is generally taken as a virtue rather than a want of nerve.
The reservations are just as consistent. A romantic subplot involving Lily James is repeatedly described as a distraction from the central pair, and a number of critics wish the film had spent more of its running time on the excavation itself. Nobody dislikes it, but the spread is wide: The Times finds it piercing and unmissable, while Empire says it lacks fire and Eye for Film considers it a missed opportunity.
T
The Times
13 January 2021 · ★★★★★
100
The film is an extraordinary, emotionally piercing and intoxicating drama about the pull of the past, with career-high turns from Fiennes and Mulligan and ambitious direction evoking Malick. It is serious, intellectually committed cinema that is unmissable.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
29 January 2021 · Kevin Crust
90*
The characters are vivid and multidimensional, the milieu inviting, and the circumstances compelling in this old-fashioned story told in an unexpected way. It is bathed in warm nostalgia and romanticism steeped in British stoicism, allowing room for melancholy, sharp wit, and genuine wonder.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
14 January 2021
90*
The film is charming, moving old-fashioned heritage cinema with strong performances from Fiennes and Mulligan and top-level craft that conveys real emotion about the fragility of lives and time.
Read the full review →V
Vulture
29 January 2021 · Bilge Ebiri
85*
The review praises the film's moving, elliptical style that connects personal lives to broader history and existence, singling out the glorious performances of Fiennes and Mulligan for conveying deep, unspoken emotion.
Read the full review →I
IndieWire
29 January 2021 · Steve Greene
80*
The review highlights the crackling chemistry between Mulligan and Fiennes as the bittersweet core of this quiet drama about history's persistence, while noting that surrounding subplots and characters often feel superfluous.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
27 January 2021 · Dan Rubins
80*
The critic commends the film for its eloquent focus on history, mortality, and human connections through strong performances, particularly Mulligan and Fiennes, and its reverence for the past amid personal and national transitions.
Read the full review →T
The Telegraph
29 January 2021 · ★★★★ · Robbie Collin
80
The film is a beautiful, heartfelt period tale that draws a line between the earthy and the ethereal, with strong performances from the cast exploring themes of history and mortality. It notes that the story is ultimately conventional but still consoling and escapist.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
13 January 2021 · David Rooney
75*
The critic finds the film a somewhat awkward but satisfying period drama with strong performances from Mulligan and Fiennes, praising their rapport and the film's gentle melancholy and restraint despite an uneven shift to ensemble storytelling.
Read the full review →F
Financial Times
27 January 2021 · 4 · Danny Leigh
70*
The film is sometimes hackneyed, sometimes marvellous, with vivid performances from the leads and fresh direction that shoots the Suffolk landscape with widescreen grandeur. It features a standout underground sequence that is pure cinema.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
29 January 2021
70*
The film is a modest heritage drama whose sincerity survives the Netflix touch, with strong performances from Fiennes and Mulligan anchoring an undemanding but pleasantly cathartic story of the Sutton Hoo discovery.
Read the full review →A
The AV Club
13 January 2021 · B- · Katie Rife
70
The critic describes the film as a stuffy adaptation that poetically explores themes of time, mortality, and repressed longing through elegant visuals, but faults its halting storytelling, inertia, and failure to deliver on promising ideas.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
31 January 2021
70*
The film is a gently understated period drama with charm to spare about the Sutton Hoo excavation, focusing on an unlikely friendship between a self-taught archaeologist and a wealthy widow. It praises the leads' performances and cinematography but notes a superfluous romantic subplot.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
28 January 2021 · Glenn Kenny
70*
The film is a consistently interesting and at times engrossing picture that declines to strike its notes with a hammer. It considers weighty themes including who owns history, class inequality, and the intertwining of sexual repression and loneliness while remaining scrupulous, sober, and tasteful.
Read the full review →V
Variety
13 January 2021 · Peter Debruge
70*
The unhurried yet engaging project features meticulously calibrated performances from Carey Mulligan and Ralph Fiennes as the leads explore a dynamic of mutual respect that transcends education and class. Director Simon Stone approaches the period piece in Merchant Ivory mode about making the most of fleeting friendships and loves.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
27 January 2021 · Charlotte O'Sullivan
65*
The film is a wistfully cosy Netflix drama that benefits from an incredible cast and the strength of its source material despite taking liberties with history. It praises the performances, especially Mulligan's conveyance of loneliness and longing, but criticizes the casting of a younger actor in an older role and notes that the story could have been deeper.
Read the full review →E
Empire
26 January 2021 · Ian Freer
60*
The Dig is well played, especially by the leads, and visually gorgeous, but it lacks fire and ironically doesn’t get under the surface of its story. It gets by on strong performances, some gorgeous filmmaking and the idea of good people coming together, while noting the refreshing intellectual intimacy between the main characters rather than romance.
Read the full review →L
Little White Lies
29 January 2021 · 3/3/3 · David Jenkins
60
The film wheels out soft romantic subplots at the expense of the dig's drama and spends too little time conveying the historical importance of Sutton Hoo, but Carey Mulligan shines with sultry verve as Edith Pretty.
Read the full review →Ralph Fiennes and Carey Mulligan bring heart to the story of the Sutton Hoo excavation, with their odd-couple alliance engaging, but a romantic subplot involving Lily James proves an unwelcome distraction and the film could have dug deeper into Basil Brown's story.
Read the full review →i
The i Paper
28 January 2021 · ★★★ · Geoffrey Macnab
60
The adaptation is less about the archaeology than about yearning, love and death in a class-stratified society, with early scenes often magical thanks to evocative cinematography. It highlights strong performances by Mulligan and Fiennes and the subtle treatment of their characters' inhibited relationship, though the second half loses some power as it explores other subplots.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
25 January 2021 · ★★★ · Phil de Semlyen
60
This sun-soaked period drama is a gentle tonic with hidden emotional depths beneath its heritage trappings, though the romantic subplot distracts from the central odd-couple dynamic between Fiennes and Mulligan.
Read the full review →P
Paste
21 January 2021 · 8.7 · Aparita Bhandari
90*
The critic calls the film a lovely, meditative artifact and calming balm that offers a wonderful escape from reality. They single out the strong performances by Fiennes and Mulligan along with the film's respectful handling of the historical Sutton Hoo discovery.
Read the full review →D
Deadline
27 January 2021 · Pete Hammond
85*
The critic finds The Dig an entertaining and underappreciated British period drama that rewards viewers with its true story of an archaeological discovery on the eve of WWII. He singles out the splendid performances of Carey Mulligan and Ralph Fiennes as the heart of the film, along with its exquisite cinematography.
Read the full review →C
Consequence
14 January 2021
65*
The critic finds it a touching film that uses the archaeological discovery to explore how people cope with time and mortality. They single out the bucolic atmosphere and strong central performances but note it spends too much time on less compelling subplots.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
10 March 2021 · ★★★ · Jennie Kermode
60
The critic notes strong leading performances and a handful of beautifully crafted scenes alongside much clunkier and more derivative material. Overall, the film feels like a missed opportunity despite the great subject of the Sutton Hoo find.
Read the full review →P
Polygon
29 January 2021 · Robert Daniels
60*
The critic finds the film initially tedious and miscast in its early romance focus but ultimately praises its shift to a poignant meditation on mortality, legacy, and fleeting life. They single out the later emotional resonance around the historical discovery.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate