Critics’ reviews

The Dog Stars (2026)

18 reviews from 18 publications. Critics’ score 55: 5 positive, 4 mixed, 6 negative.

Back to our review of The Dog Stars

55
Positive
5
Mixed
4
Negative
6

The reviews are divided on The Dog Stars, with disappointment edging out enthusiasm for Ridley Scott’s subdued post-apocalyptic drama. Praise clusters around the landscape and aerial photography, while the more sympathetic critics welcome its attention to grief, compassion and the routines of survival. The cast also earns approval, particularly Jacob Elordi and the supporting ensemble, though several reviews find the actors working with characters too thinly written to sustain much interest.

The chief divide concerns pace: what admirers find patient and tender, detractors find lethargic and short of incident. Reservations recur around familiar plotting, uncertain shifts between contemplation and violence, and effects that some find unconvincing. The spread is wide: Deadline praises Elordi, the character development and deliberate pacing, while The AV Club faults the performances, editing and narrative, despite finding something worth considering in the film’s treatment of community versus isolation.

The Times
29 August 2026
80*

At 88, Scott returns to sci-fi with a bonkers film starring Jacob Elordi that puts on a starry show and leaves viewers yearning for more.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
26 August 2026
70*

One of Ridley Scott’s most muted and tender films, redeemed by careful attention to characters and their shared grief rather than action; wobbly in execution with predictable elements but offers understated warmth.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
25 August 2026 · David Rooney
70*

The critic finds it a subdued but pleasingly soulful dystopian western, minor-key but arguably Scott's best since The Martian, an appealingly mellow watch.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
26 August 2026 · ★★★ · Jeremy Aspinall
60

The critic finds it a thoughtful rather than spectacular post-apocalyptic tale from Ridley Scott, praising the beautiful cinematography and performances but noting meandering pacing that dilutes tension.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
26 August 2026 · ★★★ · Tim Robey
60

Scott delivers an oddly blissful and watchable post-apocalyptic yarn focused on day-to-day survival and scenic flights, with a chummy lead quartet and some splattery action. It gestures toward hope but leans into carnage and convenient plotting.

Read the full review →
Time Out
26 August 2026 · ★★★ · Simon Crook
60

Ridley Scott delivers a hopeful if bumpy post-collapse drama that is a surprisingly sensitive meditation on loss and compassion, but it stumbles with a cartoonish misstep involving Allison Janney that kills the mood.

Read the full review →
Financial Times
26 August 2026
50*

Jacob Elordi plods through Ridley Scott’s uneven vision of post-apocalyptic America, which combines fear of marauders with an ode to organic farming and scenic vistas.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
25 August 2026 · D+ · Monica Castillo
43

One of Scott's worst misfires and dullest movies, with bad special effects, janky editing, underdeveloped performances, and a messy narrative, though it has a thought-provoking thread on community versus isolation.

Read the full review →
Empire
26 August 2026 · Helen O’Hara
40*

The critic finds the film too downbeat and familiar to make a lasting impression, with a narrative that fails to match its visual strengths. They single out the glorious aerial photography and Scott’s energetic direction for praise while noting confusing tone shifts and a lack of originality.

Read the full review →
Vulture
27 August 2026
40*

The first half holds attention with its mood of hesitant survival and character contrasts, but the film feels fundamentally hollow overall, with functional rather than awe-inspiring visuals that lack the aestheticism of Scott's earlier work.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
25 August 2026 · Ryan Lattanzio
30*

The film is a bizarrely inert post-apocalypse movie that Jacob Elordi and Josh Brolin cannot save from near-disaster, curiously lacking in thrills.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
26 August 2026
30*

The film is a limp and lethargic postapocalyptic survival tale that fails to find its footing amid overly familiar beats and a glum lack of energy. Scott appears disengaged, with stunning scenery undermined by insubstantial characters and janky effects.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
28 August 2026 · Amy Nicholson

Familiar to a fault, Ridley Scott’s postapocalyptic film finds the genre in need of new tricks and is hard to sit up and stay interested in. It is a lax adaptation whose best parts are its giddy, bloody action sequences.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
27 August 2026 · Jeannette Catsoulis

A terrific cast led by Jacob Elordi and Margaret Qualley struggles to lift Ridley Scott’s contemplative dystopia out of the doldrums. The film feels more romantic than thrilling, with heartfelt but familiar hokum elements.

Read the full review →
Variety
25 August 2026 · Guy Lodge

Ridley Scott’s low-energy latest is a dreary dystopian adventure in which even a charismatic quartet of actors muddles through trying circumstances. The film is surprisingly low-incident and lacks real characters to hold onto.

Read the full review →
Polygon
25 August 2026 · Jake Kleinman
85*

The critic finds the film an enjoyable post-apocalyptic drama elevated by its visuals and a surprising third-act twist into something closer to an instant classic. They single out the cinematography capturing the beauty of the Rockies and abandoned landscapes for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Deadline
25 August 2026 · Pete Hammond
80*

The critic praises Jacob Elordi’s performance as a hopeful survivor in Ridley Scott’s post-apocalyptic thriller, highlighting strong character development and impressive action sequences alongside solid supporting turns from Josh Brolin and others. They single out the gorgeous cinematography and deliberate pacing as strengths in what feels like a classic Hollywood film.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
26 August 2026 · Ian Sandwell
30*

The critic finds the film a post-apocalyptic bore hampered by a slow pace and an unengaging hero, despite some effective sequences and a good dog. They single out the familiar tropes and lack of momentum as major issues.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate