Critics’ reviews

The Draughtsman's Contract (1982)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 77: 9 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Draughtsman's Contract

77
Positive
9
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to The Draughtsman’s Contract, with praise clustering around its barbed dialogue, painterly compositions and elaborate period costumes. The reviews find that Greenaway’s carefully arranged landscapes and verbal sparring make the country-house mystery funny and unsettling, with social cruelty beneath the polite manners. Many also welcome the demands it makes on its audience, treating its clues and unanswered questions as invitations to look more closely rather than obstacles to enjoyment.

The reservations concern how far that pleasure survives the film’s mannered storytelling, though the spread runs from enthusiasm to qualified approval rather than outright rejection. The AV Club finds it rewarding as a patterned puzzle but less successful as a straightforward narrative, while Empire praises the plot’s construction. The New Yorker offers the clearest dissent, suggesting that the superior tone can become boring and that the violence jars with the comedy’s artifice.

RogerEbert.com
14 December 2012 · Roger Ebert
90*

The film is a tantalizing puzzle wrapped in eroticism and presented with utmost elegance. Greenaway gives viewers clues to a complex story of plots and murder but leaves them to draw their own conclusions rather than spelling everything out.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
22 June 1983 · Vincent Canby
90*

The film is cinema's first Restoration comedy-mystery, an enigmatic tale of murder set in 1694 with loose morals and mannered behavior. Greenaway creates a detailed, elegant, and mindbendingly rich picture of the period through words as weapons and lush landscapes.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
10 November 2022 · Peter Bradshaw
85*

Greenaway’s arch tale of sexual and political manipulation has not lost its power to bewilder and compel after 40 years. The critic praises its singular brilliance, bizarre vehemence and intensity, and refusal to dumb anything down.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
12 November 2022 · Finlay Spencer
80*

The critic celebrates the film as a fresh and funny blueprint for modern period pieces thanks to its acerbic script and anachronistic flourishes. They single out the witty, barbed dialogue and the painterly visual style blended with new-wave influences.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Alan Morrison
70*

The critic presents the film as enjoyable both as a country-house murder mystery with Restoration trappings and for its playfully significant formal structure. A well-constructed plot is singled out as a strength.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
22 January 2008 · Jeremiah Kipp
70*

The film is a fledgling attempt at Greenaway's later perfected style, told through obsessive long-take tableaus that feel like diving into a painting. There is a story and mystery here that prevents the director from indulging in his sometimes alienating proclivities, resolved with merciless efficiency.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
13 February 2008 · Tasha Robinson
70*

Contract is a sordid and gorgeous bridge between Greenaway's experimental films and his narrative period, with elaborate costumes and beautiful landscapes contrasting the characters' blunt brutality. It often feels like an inexact bridge, too mannered to take in as a straightforward narrative but rewarding as an elaborately patterned puzzle box.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 January 1982
70*

The film seems a comedy of manners but reveals underlying viciousness among the rich that foreshadows upheavals. It is well-lensed with fine costumes, lovely surroundings, and a limpid narration that switches from observation of the landed class to a foreboding tale of murder.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
15 August 1983 · Pauline Kael
60*

The film is a formalist tease and fantasia of conceits about perspective, the artist, his art, and the world, with a suggestion of Antonioni’s Blow-Up in its clues and murder plot. The sudden burst of Jacobean violence disrupts the Restoration-comedy artifice, and the superior tone may bore some viewers.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
24 February 2004 · The Hoodler
85*

The critic calls the film a sublime piece of filmmaking, elegant and visually exquisite with opulent costumes, grandeur, and landscaped beauty. They praise its deft composition like paintings, witty comedy that makes it accessible, and deeper layers of social critique beneath the surface mystery.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate