Critics’ reviews

The Duchess (2008)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 66: 6 positive, 3 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Duchess

66
Positive
6
Mixed
3
Negative
1

Most critics come down in favour, if without much heat. The praise gathers almost entirely around Keira Knightley, whose Georgiana is described as restrained, emotionally alert and enigmatic, holding wit and concealed unhappiness in the same face. The production is the other point of agreement: the estates, the costumes, the colour and the intimate dining scenes are noted again and again. Ralph Fiennes earns his own following, and the Los Angeles Times goes further, saying his perplexed, quietly complex duke ends up dominating the picture. Paste also singles out Hayley Atwell.

The reservations are about feeling. Several reviews call the film too tame or bloodless to do justice to its heroine, with Slant arguing it stops short of her more bitter years and Empire finding the third act sags. The spread is fairly wide: The AV Club is moved by it, while The Hollywood Reporter and Eye for Film find a handsome costume drama with too little feeling in it.

The AV Club
18 September 2008 · B+ · Noel Murray
83

Murray finds the film’s story of Georgiana’s shift from idealism to practicality fairly moving, despite its middlebrow approach. He praises Keira Knightley’s performance and says the parallels to Lady Diana work better as a reflection on ordinary people’s thwarted dreams.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
25 September 2008 · ★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
75

Ebert gives the film a positive verdict. He highlights Keira Knightley’s performance and the film’s period setting.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
15 March 2009 · Mark Kermode
75*

Kermode finds the film admirably unsentimental, balancing period style with contemporary relevance. He praises Keira Knightley’s restrained portrayal of Georgiana’s social isolation and reinvention.

Read the full review →
Empire
28 August 2008 · Simon Crook
70*

The review finds the biopic classy and well-crafted, though its third act sags slightly. It praises Keira Knightley’s enigmatic performance and the film’s intimate observational details, especially its dining scenes.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
19 September 2008 · Kenneth Turan
70*

Turan finds the film handsome and restrained, while saying Ralph Fiennes’ performance as the duke ultimately dominates it. He especially praises Fiennes’ subtle, quietly complex portrayal of a powerful man perplexed by his wife.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
17 September 2008 · ★★½/4 · Fernando F. Croce
62

Croce finds the period drama watchable but too restrained to explore its heroine’s more compelling, bitter years. He praises Keira Knightley’s emotionally alert performance, which makes Georgiana an affecting blend of wit and concealed tragedy.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
31 August 2008 · Kirk Honeycutt
40*

Honeycutt finds the film an accomplished but uninspired costume drama that does not fully convey Georgiana’s modernity. He praises Keira Knightley’s performance and the production’s grand estates, while criticizing the melodrama as bloodless.

Read the full review →
Paste
13 October 2008 · Tim Basham
72*

Basham finds the film a somewhat soap-operatic period piece, but says its performances make it worthwhile. He especially praises Keira Knightley’s portrayal of Georgiana and singles out Hayley Atwell’s performance as another highlight.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
17 September 2008
60*

The page is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. Its URL suggests a complaint about the film’s corseted approach, but the article text is unavailable.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
30 August 2008 · Maria Realf
45*

Realf finds the film handsome but emotionally tame, falling short of becoming a classic. She praises its lavish sets, costumes and colour, while faulting the lack of sexual tension and chemistry.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate