Critics’ reviews

The Elephant Man (1980)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 76: 5 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Elephant Man

76
Positive
5
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics respond warmly to The Elephant Man, with praise clustering around John Hurt’s restrained portrayal of Merrick and Anthony Hopkins’s supporting performance. The reviews value the sympathy David Lynch builds for his subject, alongside the eerie atmosphere of Victorian squalor. Several see the film’s emotional directness as compatible with Lynch’s taste for strangeness, rather than a retreat from it. Time Out singles out Freddie Francis’s black-and-white cinematography, linking the film’s accessible humanism to its darker undertones.

The disagreement concerns how much the film has to say about the humanity it asks audiences to recognise. Most critics find tenderness, dignity and an avoidance of exploitation; the negative review from RogerEbert.com finds a shallow philosophy centred on Merrick’s appearance and perseverance, and questions the story’s treatment. The spread is therefore wide, but the dissent is isolated: the favourable reviews largely agree on the performances and Lynch’s handling of sympathy.

The New Yorker
20 October 1980 · Pauline Kael
90*

The film is a very pleasurable surprise with extraordinary taste and grace from the young director. Lynch builds sympathy without exploitation and creates eerily satisfying images in a conventional narrative.

Read the full review →
Empire
20 December 2005 · Kim Newman
85*

The critic praises the subtle central performances by John Hurt and Anthony Hopkins, and Lynch's ability to blend emotional depth with his signature cinematic strangeness in depicting Victorian Britain.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1979 · Variety Staff
85*

Lynch has created an eerily compelling atmosphere in recounting the deformed man's life. Hopkins and especially Hurt deliver splendid and virtuoso performances.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
3 October 1980 · Vincent Canby
80*

Lynch's film is a handsome, eerie, disturbing movie that is a very benign horror film. It presents a study in genteelness amid Victorian squalor.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
1 January 1980 · Roger Ebert
40*

The film offers a shallow philosophy that merely highlights Merrick's hideous appearance and his perseverance. It employs the story in ways that the critic finds questionable.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· John Pym

The critic praises the film's moving portrayal of friendship and human dignity, singling out John Hurt's undemonstrative dignity in the lead role and the restrained mysticism blended with populism.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TM

The review highlights the film's accessible humanism and darker undertones, praising the stunning black-and-white cinematography by Freddie Francis and the tender yet questioning portrayal of Merrick's humanity.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
20 April 2020 · Luke Walpole
80*

The film is a deeply human and emotive work that stands out among Lynch's more surreal output. The critic praises the performances, particularly John Hurt's portrayal of Merrick and Anthony Hopkins as Treves, along with the film's exploration of humanity and dehumanization.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate