Critics’ reviews

The Emigrants (1971)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 81: 6 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Emigrants

81
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics are warm, and the praise gathers around two things: the lead performances and the camera. Max von Sydow and Liv Ullmann are singled out again and again, their partnership read as the film’s spine. Jan Troell’s handheld photography, particularly on the Atlantic crossing, is widely admired, as are the long takes and the attention paid to soil, weather and hardship. Several reviewers treat the film and its sequel as one work and say it plays better that way.

The reservations are about pace and feeling. The New York Times finds it stately and episodic, with characters too simply drawn to land emotionally, and Time Out concedes it is slow going before it gets there. The New Yorker admits an early distance from the stolid characters that lifts as the film goes on. The spread runs from lukewarm to unreserved, but nobody dismisses it.

RogerEbert.com
15 January 1973 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The critic praises the film as a masterpiece that honestly depicts European peasants' desperate emigration to America in search of better lives, highlighting its emotional depth, historical authenticity, and strong performances by Max von Sydow and Liv Ullmann.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
9 February 2016 · Carson Lund
85*

The critic finds the films a touching study of the symbiosis between Max von Sydow and Liv Ullmann and Troell's defining accomplishment. He singles out the intimate, handheld camerawork capturing the hellish Atlantic crossing and the gradual erosion of religious certainty among the emigrants.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
6 February 2016 · Mike D'Angelo
80*

The critic views the two films as best experienced together as one satisfying epic and finds the sequel stronger. He singles out the powerful, largely dialogue-free sequence in the second film showing Robert's failed gold-rush journey, cut against his illness in Sweden.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
23 September 1972 · Pauline Kael
75*

The critic describes the film as a broad-backed nature epic that directly confronts the grim realities of mid-19th-century Swedish emigration and the brutal voyage, praising its earth spirit and resonance despite initial alienation from the stolid characters.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · GA
70*

The first half of a two-film adaptation of Vilhelm Moberg's novels, it offers an austere, long, and picturesque recreation of Swedish farmers' hardships in the 1850s as they seek a better life in America. It is very slow but subtly acted and ultimately moving, with Troell's multifaceted role underscoring themes of human courage and dignity.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
25 September 1972 · Vincent Canby
60*

The critic finds the film a stately, pictorially romantic chronicle of Swedish peasants' emigration driven by hardship, impressive in conception and location shooting but with reservations about its episodic form, lack of emotional impact, and overly simple characters.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
31 January 2017 · ★★★★★ · Philip Concannon
100

The critic calls Jan Troell's epic two-part drama the best expression of the 19th-century immigrant experience, praising the magnificent lead performances by Max von Sydow and Liv Ullmann and the director's slow, immersive long takes and Malick-like attention to the natural world.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate