Critics’ reviews

The Exorcist (1973)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 81: 5 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Exorcist

81
Positive
5
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics regard The Exorcist as forceful, carefully made horror, with praise clustering around William Friedkin’s direction and the credibility of the performances. The reviews repeatedly identify ordinary domestic life as the foundation of its terror: the disturbing imagery works because the people facing it seem believable. Ellen Burstyn receives particular praise, while the makeup effects, sound and score help explain why critics find the film’s shocks persist beyond the viewing.

The spread is wide despite the strongly positive lean. The New York Times supplies the clear dissent, admiring the cast but finding the supernatural material ridiculous and the experience punishing rather than persuasive. That disagreement concerns the film’s whole approach, not a minor weakness. Elsewhere, reservations are scarce; Empire specifically assesses the Director’s Cut, crediting the added footage and improved picture and sound with strengthening the atmosphere.

Time Out
21 September 2024 · ★★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
100

The critic hails William Friedkin’s adaptation as the greatest horror movie, praising how it fuses extreme imagery with everyday suburban life and shoots the story like straight drama. One element singled out is the transgressive crucifix scene as perhaps the most upsetting image in a Hollywood film.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
26 December 1973 · Roger Ebert
85*

The film is a powerful, technically masterful piece of horror craftsmanship that assaults viewers with raw emotional shocks and special effects. Ebert singles out the convincing performances, especially Ellen Burstyn as the mother, and the way it transcends typical genre efforts.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
27 December 1973 · Vincent Canby
40*

The adaptation is a chunk of elegant occultist claptrap that is practically impossible to sit through due to its spectacular nonsense and ridiculous details. Canby praises the cast, including Ellen Burstyn and Max von Sydow, but criticizes the film's overall approach.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas

The review praises the Director's Cut for enriching the atmosphere with added footage and an enhanced print and sound design. It notes that the film remains a masterpiece that terrifies when given proper attention.

Read the full review →
Total Film
17 November 1998

The review calls it the horror movie of the century, highlighting Friedkin's skill in rupturing everyday normality with profound fear and ancient clashes between good and evil. It deems it essential viewing for cinema lovers.

Read the full review →
Collider
27 October 2022 · 10/10 · Nate Richard
100

The critic finds the film still deeply disturbing and effective after nearly 50 years, praising its meticulous direction, believable characters, makeup effects, and creepy score as a perfect blend that lingers with viewers long after viewing.

Read the full review →
Paste
26 December 2023 · Jim Vorel
90*

The piece crowns the film the standout horror release of 1973, highlighting its lasting ability to shock and horrify audiences decades later through visceral imagery, strong performances, and its role in elevating the genre's critical status.

Read the full review →
/Film
6 October 2025 · Bryan Young
80*

The critic, watching the film for the first time decades after its release, finds it terrific and much better than expected. They single out its compelling study of faith, the helplessness of the characters, and strong performances, especially from Jason Miller and Ellen Burstyn.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate