Critics’ reviews

The Fifth Element (1997)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 64: 6 positive, 1 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of The Fifth Element

64
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
3
The Telegraph
5 August 2017
90*

The piece celebrates the film as a thrillingly overblown, pop-art masterwork and one of the craziest and most pleasurable sci-fi films, whose inventive style influenced later fantasy cinema; the critic has loved it since first viewing and sees it as pure blockbuster fun.

Read the full review →
The Times
22 November 2003
90*

The critic calls Besson’s film a riotously daft, fun sci-fi adventure that is light-years ahead in entertainment value compared to more serious entries like The Matrix, drawing on camp traditions like Flash Gordon with its flamboyant European style and strong supporting cast.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Adam Smith
80*

The critic praises the film's groundbreaking visuals as unlike anything seen before, with a bright, comic-strip-inspired future that could redefine sci-fi imagery. They note some conceptual overload and uneven comedy in the third act but conclude that the stunning look makes up for minor story issues.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
10 May 2017 · Patrick Sproull
80*

The critic celebrates the film's enduring off-kilter charm and visual inventiveness twenty years on. They single out its unique world-building and comic tone as setting the template for playful, idiosyncratic big-budget sci-fi.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
9 May 1997 · Kevin Thomas
80*

The critic praises the film as a warmer, more fun, and campy sci-fi extravaganza with some of the most sophisticated and witty production and costume design imaginable. He singles out Bruce Willis as the true fifth element who holds everything together with smarts, style, humor, and humanity.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

The critic hails the film as a superb, socially conscious sci-fi adventure with slick satire, unusual visuals and futuristic thrills. They single out Gary Oldman's villain and the camp resort-planet sequence for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
21 July 2014 · GA
60*

The review finds enjoyment in the lead performance, production design, costumes and effects. It criticises the messy narrative overloaded with eccentric characters and the film's hypocritical delight in violence.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
9 May 1997 · Janet Maslin
40*

The critic views the film as a gaudy, big-budget French effort to play the Hollywood cartoon blockbuster game that prioritizes hot design and hollow excitement over plot coherence. She notes that Bruce Willis provides some much-needed ballast but that the film is pitched at a teen audience and has already lost its way.

Read the full review →
Variety
7 May 1997 · ** · Todd McCarthy
30*

The critic calls the film a largely misfired European attempt at an American-style sci-fi spectacular consisting of a hodgepodge of elements that do not coalesce. He singles out Bruce Willis as the only solid, recognizable presence amid the mishmash while criticizing the narrative, effects, and overall execution.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
9 May 1997
10*

The review finds the film a dimwitted, chaotic sci-fi mess lacking a coherent story amid its noise, costumes, effects and production design. It criticizes the generic plot, soulless techno elements and dopey design choices while noting the cast is reduced to spouting bad dialogue or wearing funny hairstyles.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate