Critics’ reviews

The General (1926)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 84: 13 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The General

84
Positive
13
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics greet The General with strong enthusiasm, with praise concentrated on Buster Keaton’s physical performance and the construction of the train chases. The reviews repeatedly single out his dangerous stunt work, precise timing and ability to build elaborate comedy around machinery while keeping his expression composed. Several also stress how well the action and comedy work together: the gags sustain the pursuit rather than interrupt it. The Civil War setting and location work receive praise for giving the slapstick scale and a convincing backdrop.

The spread is wide, but dissent is isolated: thirteen reviews are positive and one is negative. Variety’s contemporary review rejects the central chase as elementary and finds the comedy unsuccessful. The New Yorker’s early response is milder than the later acclaim, describing a quiet, pleasant diversion. Reservations do not form a shared complaint; the main difference is between measured enjoyment and wholehearted admiration.

Time Out
21 January 2014 · ★★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
100

The film is the perfect chase movie, never bettered. Keaton's stone-faced pursuit of his stolen train and fiancée features breathtaking set-pieces and stunts amid Civil War action and character comedy.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
9 December 2009 · A · Emily St. James
95

The film is the defining 1926 classic and perhaps the first action comedy, making great use of Keaton’s physicality, location work, and framed calamity in its train-chase setpieces that still hold up. It offers the best case for Keaton over Chaplin through its elaborate construction and visceral gags that build to something greater, marking its place in cinematic history and influencing modern action films.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2013 · Simon Braund
90*

The critic calls it one of the greatest screen comedies ever made and Keaton's magnum opus. They single out the perfectly choreographed gags, impeccable timing, and Keaton's nimble stunt work set against an authentic Civil War backdrop.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
14 July 2014 · Max O'Connell
90*

This is presented as a Criticwire Classic of the Week retrospective on the Buster Keaton film. The piece celebrates it as a landmark silent comedy with enduring appeal and technical brilliance in its action sequences.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
19 September 1991
90*

The critic regards the film as Keaton's finest, praising its jitterbug pace and layered classic scenes. He singles out the energetic comic style and hazardous stunts for praise in this retrospective piece.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
31 May 1997 · Roger Ebert
90*

The critic calls the film a masterpiece of silent comedy and one of the greatest films ever made. He singles out the elaborate train chases and dangerous stunts performed by Keaton himself for praise.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
23 January 2014 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

The critic praises Buster Keaton's pioneering 1926 silent film as more or less inventing the action movie, with its epic ambition and startling athleticism, precision and comic timing still evident on re-release.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
1 August 1971 · Vincent Canby
90*

The critic hails the film as a masterpiece that is a farce, history, romance and triumph of movie art. He singles out Keaton's harmony with objects and the locomotive for praise in this re-release review.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
23 January 2014 · Tim Robey
90*

The critic calls it almost certainly the funniest silent film ever made and widely considered Keaton's masterpiece, highlighting its virtuoso slapstick, unflagging momentum, intricate plotting and split-second perfect stunts and pacing.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
11 November 2008
70*

The newly burnished look of this silent-cinema landmark on DVD demands a fresh gaze at Keaton’s least characteristic great film, which combines man-on-a-quest comedy with Civil War epic trappings and impressive pyrotechnics in its climactic sequences. It affirms the star’s heroic persona in solemn circumstances while lacking self-importance, with the restoration allowing appreciation of its visual clarity and historical poesy.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
12 February 1927
70*

The critic finds the film a quiet and unassuming comedy that is altogether a pleasant relaxation. He singles out the novel treatment of the inefficient heroine who is subjected to indignities for note.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1926 · Variety Staff
30*

The critic finds the film far from fussy and calls the result a flop. He singles out the elementary chase built around the star as the principal comedy scene for complaint.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
24 January 2014 · ★★★★★ · Matt Seton
100

The review hails the film as a masterpiece of silent comedy, vast in scope yet subtle in execution, and essential viewing due to Keaton's ambitious stunts and performance. It notes the new 4K restoration makes it a perfect opportunity to appreciate the work.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
18 January 2014 · Jennie Kermode
85*

The critic praises the restored print for restoring the film's original impact and grip on audiences through inventive chases and slapstick. Keaton is singled out for conveying emotion through his eyes and maintaining sincerity amid buffoonery and daring stunts.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate