Critics’ reviews

The Ghoul (2017)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 66: 4 positive, 4 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Ghoul

66
Positive
4
Mixed
4
Negative
1

Most critics are warm towards Gareth Tunley’s debut, if rarely effusive: four positive notices, four mixed and one negative. The praise clusters on Tom Meeten’s brooding, understated lead performance, which several reviews credit with keeping a slippery story grounded, and on Paul Kaye’s late-night monologue, which even the harshest review calls beautifully delivered. The atmosphere draws consistent approval, as does the film’s blurring of investigation, therapy and delusion against London’s streets. Tunley is widely marked as one to watch.

Where they part is the plotting. Sight and Sound and Variety find the convolutions reward a second viewing; The Hollywood Reporter finds the screenplay too slight and cryptic to pay off its promise, and HeyUGuys says the final act frustrates. Empire concedes the austere approach will not suit everyone. The spread is wide, from 85 down to 40, and the lone dissenter is Little White Lies, which calls it a noble failure with contrived plotting and a hollow emotional core.

Sight and Sound
3 August 2017 · Anton Bitel
85*

Bitel finds the film an impressively melancholic, brain-bending tragedy whose convolutions reward repeat viewings. He praises its inventive interweaving of reality and delusion, heightened by London’s labyrinthine streets and buildings.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
6 August 2017 · Wendy Ide
80*

Wendy Ide finds the film a brilliantly perplexing, unsettling psychological thriller. She singles out Paul Kaye’s electrifying monologue and the off-kilter therapy sessions for praise.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 August 2017 · Kim Newman
75*

Newman finds the film powerful, disturbing and intense, while acknowledging its austere approach will not appeal to everyone. He singles out Tom Meeten’s intense performance and Gareth Tunley’s ambitious filmmaking for praise.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 November 2016 · festival review · Catherine Bray
75*

Bray finds the film an auspicious, haunting debut whose psychological twists reward repeat viewing. She praises Tom Meeten’s understated performance for keeping the story grounded while concealing its stranger direction.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · David Parkinson
60

Parkinson finds the film an unsettling, unconventional take on a police procedural. He highlights how its investigation blurs the boundaries between fantasy and reality.

Read the full review →
Time Out
25 July 2017 · ★★★ · Anna Smith
60

The critic finds the film an intriguing, ambitious thriller with a surreal story that keeps viewers guessing. She praises its assured debut filmmaking and its ability to mark Gareth Tunley as one to watch.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
10 August 2017 · Stephen Dalton
55*

Dalton finds the film an effective but ultimately incomplete exercise in suspense, too slight and cryptic to deliver on its mind-bending promise. He praises its steadily building atmosphere and Tom Meeten’s brooding performance, while faulting the screenplay for leaving too many questions unanswered.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
4 August 2017 · 3/2/2 · David Jenkins
40

Jenkins calls the film a noble failure, criticizing its contrived plotting and hollow emotional core. He singles out Paul Kaye’s midnight monologue as a compelling, beautifully delivered highlight.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
festival review
65*

The critic finds the ambitious debut intriguing and atmospheric, though its cryptic final act and straight-faced tone can frustrate. Tom Meeten’s complex lead performance is singled out for praise, alongside Alice Lowe’s tender scenes with him.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate