Critics’ reviews

The Graduate (1967)

17 reviews from 17 publications. Critics’ score 83: 15 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Graduate

83
Positive
15
Mixed
2
Negative
0
Radio Times
★★★★★ · Tom Hutchinson
100

This landmark satire on America's bourgeoisie thrust Dustin Hoffman into the limelight and won a best director Oscar for Mike Nichols. The critic highlights Hoffman's sensational performance, the biting screenplay, innovative camerawork and the perfect Simon and Garfunkel soundtrack.

Read the full review →
The Independent
21 June 2017 · ★★★★★
100

The re-released classic remains beguiling fifty years on, largely thanks to Dustin Hoffman's breakthrough performance as the awkward, panicked Benjamin, which mixes humour, boredom and vulnerability in equal measure.

Read the full review →
The Times
11 September 2025 · ★★★★★ · Kevin Maher
100

Mrs Robinson emerges as the sympathetic heroine in this reappraisal of the classic, far more dignified and complex than Hoffman's spoilt, creepy Benjamin. Nichols's direction and the performances highlight her conflicted humanity amid the film's generational and marital tensions.

Read the full review →
Time Out
19 June 2017 · ★★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
100

Mike Nichols’s near-flawless class satire still feels as sly, modern and bracing as it must have in 1967. The critic praises the iconic scenes that have entered the culture and the magnificent chase-to-the-church finale with its unnerving closing shot.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
26 December 1967 · Roger Ebert
90*

Ebert calls it the funniest American comedy of the year with a clear subversive point of view against upper-middle-class conformity. He praises Mike Nichols as a major new director, Dustin Hoffman's awkward ethical performance, and Anne Bancroft's sexy, shrewish turn.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
10 April 2012 · Budd Wilkins
90*

The review highlights the film's formal experimentation, use of long takes, pop music soundtrack, and examination of discomfort and anomie over typical teen sex comedy tropes. It praises the performances, especially Hoffman, Bancroft, and Ross, and Nichols and Surtees' inventive cinematography and editing.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
22 December 1967 · Bosley Crowther
90*

Crowther hails the film as one of the best of the year and a sharp seriocomic social satire in the vein of Preston Sturges. He singles out its sophisticated wit, excellent performances by Bancroft, Hoffman, and Ross, and first-rate staging and music.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
85*

Mike Nichols delivers biting satire on late-60s American values and social dysfunction through a witty script and assured direction; standout performances from Hoffman, Bancroft and Ross, plus Simon & Garfunkel songs, create an enduring, funny and sharply observed classic with an ambiguous ending.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
1 June 2017 · Henry Bevan
80*

Mike Nichols’ 1967 film is a great tonic for anyone suffering from post-university blues, creating a touching portrait of anxiety and dislocation from society. The critic singles out the dinner party scene and the metaphor of Ben submerged in the swimming pool for praise.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
1 May 1999 · Richard T. Jameson
70*

The film remains a time capsule that captures a pivotal shift in American moviegoing consciousness, making audiences newly aware of cinematic technique through its innovative style and storytelling. It praises the film's visual and editing choices, such as deep-focus setups and seamless transitions between scenes, as groundbreaking and influential.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
18 December 1967
70*

The critic calls it a brutally funny look at contemporary youth that is on target for most of its course and will benefit from enthusiastic word of mouth. They praise the adaptation's preservation of the novel's dialogue and Nichols' visual and stylistic approach suited to the subject.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
30 December 1967
70*

The review finds the film one of the liveliest gifts of the season thanks to its novelty and substance, with strong performances especially from Hoffman and Bancroft. It faults Nichols' direction for making it more prankish and less savage than the material deserved.

Read the full review →
Variety
18 December 1967 · A.D. Murphy
70*

Murphy deems it a delightful satirical comedy-drama with strong box-office prospects, crediting the screenplay, cast led by Bancroft, Ross, and Hoffman, and Nichols' modern direction. He notes it works best in its hilarious first two-thirds before faltering in pacing.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
21 November 2014
50*

The film is not as exciting or groundbreaking as its reputation claims and relies on packaging tricks, but it is very funny. Nichols excels at capturing absurdity and non-communication in the early sections, with strong performances from Hoffman and Bancroft, though it later descends into pretension.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
15 September 2025 · ★★★★★ · Jack Hawkins
100

The review highlights the film's enduring appeal as a zeitgeisty yet timeless satire on suburban expectations and youthful uncertainty, crediting human performances and sharp commentary. It notes the excellent 4K restoration enhances its landmark status across generations.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
23 October 2004 · Angus Wolfe Murray
85*

The critic finds the film as fresh and inventive as ever, praising Mike Nichols' direction, the sharp screenplay, and Dustin Hoffman's benchmark anti-hero performance. It singles out the precise editing and memorable satirical performances that capture phony suburban life.

Read the full review →
Paste
28 April 2017 · Kenneth Lowe
65*

The critic finds the film still good but dated, with hazy motivations and an unfair portrayal of female characters, especially Mrs. Robinson. He praises its wit, cleverness, and visual storytelling while noting it remains frozen in its 1960s era.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate