Critics’ reviews

The Greatest Show on Earth (1952)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 61: 4 positive, 0 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of The Greatest Show on Earth

61
Positive
4
Mixed
0
Negative
3

Most critics, certainly those writing on release, take the film as showmanship first and judge it kindly on those terms. The praise clusters on DeMille’s staging of the circus itself: acts filmed under a real big top with Ringling Bros., the colour and movement of the parades, the montage of the caravan on the road. Several find the Hollywood stars slot in convincingly among the working performers, and the train crash draws attention even from those unmoved by the rest.

The reservations gather around the story. Even admirers concede the romantic triangle is a framework rather than a drama, and the harsher notices call the characterisation childish and the romances foolish, interrupting the spectacle and stretching a long film into tedium. The spread is wide, from the trade papers and daily press of 1952 near the top to Sight and Sound at the bottom, and the split follows the calendar: the later reviews are the coldest, though The AV Club spares a word for James Stewart’s understated clown.

Los Angeles Times
22 February 1952 · Edwin Schallert
90*

Hails the film as one of DeMille's finest and a triumph of showmanship, celebrating its maximum entertainment value, glamour, authenticity from the real circus, thrilling narrative with appealing and spectacular climaxes, and the stellar cast.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
11 January 1952 · Bosley Crowther
90*

The critic praises DeMille's spectacular and authentic portrayal of the circus, highlighting its movement, life, dynamic montage effects, and the way it captures the excitement of the big top and its caravan. Strong performances from the cast are noted as enhancing the showmanship.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
2 January 1952 · David Hanna
85*

The critic praises DeMille for forging a fabulous, spectacular entertainment that captures the magic, color, and human drama of the circus with authentic detail from the Ringling Bros. partnership.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 January 1952 · Herb Golden
70*

Commends the spectacle, thrills, spangles, Big Top atmosphere, and seamless integration of Hollywood stars with real circus acts and authentic details, though notes the unsubtle story serves mainly as framework and some sequences feel like excess baggage.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
24 May 2004 · Noel Murray
40*

The critic calls it a bloated, hammy Best Picture winner with an overheated romantic triangle but singles out Jimmy Stewart's subtle clown performance and the authentic circus pageantry and acts for praise.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
12 January 1952 · John McCarten
30*

Praises the engrossing circus sequences and DeMille's handling of the spectacle when not focused on plot, but criticizes the meagre, foolish romantic storylines that interrupt and make the long film rather boring overall.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
20*

The critic finds the film boring with childish characterization and dialogue, fake circus acts, and a lack of imagination, despite its scale. They single out the megalomaniac commentary and the destructive train crash sequence.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate