Most critics like it, and the praise clusters in the same place. The reviews call it consistently, sometimes painfully funny, and credit the structure: skipping the night itself and starting with the morning after keeps the stag-do premise from feeling tired. The cast gets the rest of the credit. Nearly every review names Zach Galifianakis as the discovery, and several praise the easy chemistry between the three leads and Ken Jeong’s turn as Mr Chow.
The reservations are about what the jokes are aimed at. Slant and Time Out both object to how the film treats women, and Slant adds Asians and gay men to the list; Time Out finds the characters unlikeable and the gags tired. The New York Times wonders whether the laughs survive a second look. A smaller group, Den of Geek among them, finds it solid rather than exceptional, with chuckles more than belly laughs. The spread is wide, but the bottom is thinly populated: one negative review among sixteen.
E
Empire
28 May 2009 · Simon Braund
90*
The critic calls it a furiously paced, inventive and flat-out hilarious take on a tried-and-tested formula that maintains heart alongside the laughs. The effortless chemistry between the leads, especially the star-making turn by Galifianakis, is highlighted as a key strength.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
24 May 2009 · THR Staff
90*
The critic calls it a piercingly funny, twisted caper that makes full use of its R rating. They single out the crack ensemble cast, especially Zach Galifianakis's breakout turn, and the director's deadpan comic timing.
Read the full review →I
The Independent
13 June 2009
85*
The critic finds the film a surprising and consistently hilarious comedy that avoids clichés by skipping the night of debauchery and focusing on the aftermath. The inventive structure, creative exploration of Vegas misadventures, and strong performances from the unknown cast are singled out for praise.
Read the full review →L
Little White Lies
12 June 2009 · 3/4/4 · Limara Salt
80
The critic finds it a genuinely funny and consistently entertaining Hollywood comedy that puts a fresh spin on the stag do premise. Everything from characters to set-ups and lines works well.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
★★★★ · Karen Krizanovich
80
The critic praises this inventive and cleverly plotted comedy that blends deadpan and hysterical moments without relying on cheap gross-out humor. The wild stag-do mishaps and situations are believably funny.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
25 May 2009 · festival review
80*
The critic calls it a proudly inappropriate comedy buoyed by a clever script and strong chemistry among the male leads that elicits steady laughs from its raucous Vegas premise. It should play well with audiences.
Read the full review →The critic finds the film crass and offensive as expected from a Vegas frat-boy comedy but also really very funny and bizarrely gripping much of the time. They single out the uproarious performance of Ken Jeong as the camp Chinese gangster Mr Chow for particular praise.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
5 June 2009 · A.O. Scott
70*
The film is often very funny, thanks in part to the three lead actors who bring freshness to familiar masculine stereotypes. It delivers crude humor leavened by inventiveness and wit, though its appeal may fade upon closer examination of what prompts the laughter.
Read the full review →T
The Times
13 June 2009 · Kevin Maher
70*
The critic calls it a frat-boy comedy high on befuddled charm with easygoing chemistry between the leads and gags that are often hot though sometimes not, resulting in a sweetly raucous overall effect.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
1 June 2009
50*
The critic sees it as the apotheosis of gonzo male camaraderie fantasies, praising Galifianakis's showcase of weird one-liners and the pile-up of outrageous revelations. They complain about the slandering of Asians, gays, and women as shrill nags along with a predictable narrative.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
9 June 2009 · Tom Huddleston
30*
The critic finds the film obnoxious and crass with an unpleasant attitude toward women, wasting its intriguing premise on unlikeable characters and tired gags. Only a few performances stand out amid the aggression.
Read the full review →D
Digital Spy
7 June 2009 · Simon Reynolds
85*
The critic describes it as a gut-bustingly funny boy's own comedy and probably Phillips' funniest film to date, highlighting his skill at turning bawdy concepts into crowdpleasers and the standout cast performances.
Read the full review →C
Collider
4 June 2009 · B+ · Matt Goldberg
83
The critic calls "The Hangover" rude, loud, and painfully hilarious, a contender for the funniest film of the year despite upcoming comedies. They single out Zach Galifianakis's impeccable comedic timing as the main reason to see it.
Read the full review →P
The Playlist
4 June 2009 · B · Rodrigo Perez
77
The critic finds the film frequently amusing and entertaining with some riotous laughs, particularly from Galifianakis, but far from a comedy classic or perfect execution. He singles out the improvisational moments and closing credits as highlights amid an otherwise above-average but unremarkable frat comedy.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
9 June 2009 · Jennie Kermode
70*
The critic praises the film's unexpected intelligence and character depth in a mainstream comedy about a disastrous stag night in Vegas. She singles out the sharp script, realistic tone, and observational humor about male friendships and shared failure.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
11 June 2009 · ★★★ · Simon Brew
60
The critic finds The Hangover a solid but not exceptional comedy that falls short of Phillips' earlier work like Old School, with chuckles rather than belly laughs. Strong lead performances, especially from Galifianakis, are singled out for praise.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate