Critics’ reviews

The Hours (2002)

15 reviews from 15 publications. Critics’ score 75: 14 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Hours

75
Positive
14
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics admire The Hours, and the praise gathers in the same places. The three lead performances are singled out almost everywhere, with Nicole Kidman’s inward, brooding Virginia Woolf the one most often named as the film’s finest work. Beyond the acting, reviewers credit Stephen Daldry and David Hare with turning a difficult, layered novel into a drama that moves people through precise editing and quiet parallels rather than flashbacks or voice-over, and several remark that the tears it draws feel earned rather than engineered.

The reservations are modest and scattered. Some find it slow and a little precious; Variety thinks it plays as a collection of fine scenes rather than a whole, and Empire feels the modern strand slides into melodrama. The Guardian is cooler than most on Kidman and on a flourish in the ending. The spread is narrow, with one outright dissenter: Slant dismisses the film as a faux-feminist manifesto with spoon-fed dialogue.

Los Angeles Times
27 December 2002 · Kenneth Turan
90*

The film has turned out to be a splendid work that uses all the resources of cinema to deliver cumulative emotional power that takes viewers by surprise. It singles out the fearlessness of its emotionality, strong performances by Kidman, Streep and Moore, and the way it embraces strong feelings while maintaining intelligence and restraint.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
27 December 2002 · NYT Critic’s Pick · Stephen Holden
90*

The deeply moving film is an amazingly faithful adaptation of the novel, with Nicole Kidman delivering a performance of astounding bravery as Virginia Woolf that evokes the torment of mental illness as never shown before. It praises the layered, delicate reflection that blends three women's stories across time.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
13 December 2002
85*

Hare and Daldry have turned the novel into an elegant, intense and perhaps profound drama that will be a major awards player and must-see prestige picture. It succeeds as a rare tear-jerker driven by emotional impact rather than manipulation, with strong performances from the lead actresses.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· Sheila Johnston
80*

The film is a sophisticated treat with a complex layering of three women's stories. It praises the outstanding performances, especially Nicole Kidman's, and notes its mainstream arthouse ambitions based on a postmodern novel.

Read the full review →
The Times
13 February 2003 · Barbara Ellen
80*

The critic praises the film's excellent acting across the board, clever production design, and empathetic handling of its themes of despair and resilience, calling it a welcome highbrow literary drama about women's interior lives despite some slowness and preciousness.

Read the full review →
Variety
10 December 2002 · Todd McCarthy
80*

Considerable intelligence and strategic finesse have been brought to bear on this handsomely mounted adaptation, with fine performances and expert work from the director and cast. It singles out Kidman's brooding, inward portrait of Woolf as especially rewarding, while noting the film feels like a collection of scenes rather than a full synthesis.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
14 February 2003
75*

The critic describes the film as a daring triptych intercutting the stories of three women across eras, praising the strong, controlled performances especially from Meryl Streep and Julianne Moore while noting reservations about Nicole Kidman's portrayal and a narrative flourish in the ending.

Read the full review →
Time Out
17 November 2015 · TCh
75*

Daldry's adaptation cuts between single days in the lives of three women across the 20th century, suggesting Woolf's insights remain pertinent. It calls out more complex female characters than usual in Hollywood and deems it a boldly realised, affecting work despite minor quibbles with the score and screenplay.

Read the full review →
Empire
· William Thomas
70*

The critic praises the film's direction, writing, and especially the lead performances, highlighting Nicole Kidman's transformative portrayal of Virginia Woolf as particularly special. However, they note that the story ultimately descends into clichéd bohemian melodrama in its modern strand, undermining the thoughtful setup of the three interwoven narratives.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
27 December 2002 · Roger Ebert
70*

The film meditates on three women's lives linked by Virginia Woolf's novel Mrs. Dalloway, showing how personal freedom expanded over decades but responsibilities and guilts remained. It praises the performances, especially Nicole Kidman's portrayal of Woolf, and the emotional vortex created by the interconnected stories.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
27 December 2017 · Kirk Honeycutt
70*

The critic finds the film a fascinating and ultimately successful cross-cutting stunt among three eras of women's lives marked by repression and depression. The direction by Daldry and performances by the lead actresses are highlighted as strengths in this muted variant of cross-era storytelling.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
17 December 2002 · Ed Gonzalez
10*

The critic dismisses the film as a preposterous faux-feminist manifesto that reduces its women to sudsy abstractions of repression across generations. The screenplay's spoon-fed dialogue and graphic matches come in for particular complaint amid the melodrama.

Read the full review →
Collider
14 January 2023 · Liam Gaughan
90*

The critic views The Hours as a masterful, deeply moving contemplation on the passage of time and women's inner lives, far more than mere Oscar bait. The anthology structure and strong performances, particularly Kidman's, are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
28 January 2003 · Angus Wolfe Murray
90*

The critic states it would be difficult to overestimate the quality of this film, praising the subtle emotional connections woven between the three women's lives across decades through precise editing and insinuation rather than flashbacks or voice-over. Daldry coaxes extraordinary performances from the stellar cast, with particular note of the lead actresses' portrayals of inner turmoil and the supporting roles' impact.

Read the full review →
Paste
26 December 2022 · Lacy Baugher Milas
90*

The critic calls The Hours fantastic and a delicate, emotionally harrowing story about depression, longing, and the exhaustion of pretending to be fine. The direction's handling of parallels across timelines and the film's affirmation of life amid bleakness are highlighted.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate