Most critics come away rattled and impressed. The reviews are broadly positive, and the praise lands in two places: Elisabeth Moss, whose performance as Cecilia is singled out almost without exception for making her fear feel immediate and her resourcefulness credible, and Whannell’s direction, which builds dread from empty rooms, silence and a camera that lingers where nothing appears to be. Many also credit the film for turning H.G. Wells’s premise into a story about domestic abuse and disbelief.
The reservations cluster in the second half. Several critics find the plot develops holes, the final third runs long and the climax lands weakly. The dissenters go further: Slant Magazine and Polygon argue the film treats Cecilia’s trauma as a plot device rather than a subject, The New Yorker finds the direction thin and the ideas undeveloped, and IndieWire calls it muddled. The spread is wide at the bottom, but the bulk of the reviews sit comfortably in approval.
L
Los Angeles Times
26 February 2020 · Justin Chang
85*
Chang finds the film an intimate, expertly crafted and unsettling horror thriller that resonates with contemporary fears about abuse and disbelief. He especially praises Elisabeth Moss’s performance, whose quiet expressions of terror make Cecilia’s experience feel immediate.
Read the full review →V
Variety
24 February 2020 · Critics Pick · Owen Gleiberman
85*
Gleiberman calls the film an ingenious, entertaining thriller with emotional force. He particularly praises Elisabeth Moss’s portrayal of a woman whose abuse goes unseen and disbelieved.
Read the full review →A
The AV Club
25 February 2020 · B+ · Jesse Hassenger
83
Hassenger finds the film striking and tense, though not especially rich. He praises Elisabeth Moss’s performance for combining vulnerability with resourcefulness and making Cecilia’s perspective compelling.
Read the full review →E
Empire
25 February 2020 · John Nugent
82*
The review finds the film tense, thematically rich and a bold, fresh reinvention, though it becomes more conventional as it progresses. It praises Elisabeth Moss’s performance and Whannell’s restrained use of camera movements to build dread.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
27 February 2020 · ★★★★ · Charlotte O'Sullivan
80
O'Sullivan finds the film a timely, effective monster movie, though its plot holes and cheesy ending weaken it. She especially praises the clever camera-work and Elisabeth Moss's performance.
Read the full review →L
Little White Lies
26 February 2020 · 3/4/3 · Hannah Strong
80
Strong finds the film an inventive, satisfying horror that updates its source material effectively, though its plot develops cracks on reflection. She praises Elisabeth Moss’s performance and the film’s technical craft, especially its use of empty space and sound to create tension.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
25 February 2020 · Huw Fullerton
80*
The headline presents the film as something that has to be seen to be believed. The description praises it as a confident retelling, though the article body is unavailable.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
24 February 2020 · ★★★★ · Phil de Semlyen
80
The critic presents the film as a timely reimagining of H.G. Wells’s story. They single out Elisabeth Moss’s battle against toxic masculinity as its central strength.
Read the full review →T
Total Film
25 February 2020 · ★★★★ · Kevin Harley
80
Harley finds the film a taut, effective suspense exercise that gives Universal’s monster films fresh life, despite some second-half missteps. He especially praises Elisabeth Moss’s intense performance and the film’s carefully controlled scares.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
29 February 2020 · Simran Hans
75*
Hans finds the update gripping and smart, praising its shift of perspective toward Cecilia and the way it foregrounds women’s concerns. She singles out Elisabeth Moss’s convincing performance and Whannell’s Hitchcockian styling.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
25 February 2020 · Tim Grierson
70*
The review is positive about this outlandish horror film. It singles out Elisabeth Moss’s performance for grounding the story.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
24 February 2020 · Todd McCarthy
70*
McCarthy finds it an effective, promising revival of Universal’s monster films, though the conceit stretches somewhat near the end. He especially praises Elisabeth Moss’s resourceful lead performance and Whannell’s careful tension-building.
Read the full review →V
Vulture
26 February 2020 · Alison Willmore
70*
Willmore finds the film’s concept stronger than its execution, but considers it worthwhile overall. She singles out Elisabeth Moss’s deeply committed performance for holding the film together.
Read the full review →F
Film Comment
· Madeline Whittle
65*
The excerpt identifies this as a review but does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It singles out the update’s liberation of the monster from the old Universal antihero’s moral ambivalence.
Read the full review →The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. Its praise or complaints cannot be verified from the material provided.
Read the full review →I
IndieWire
25 February 2020 · D+ · Jude Dry
43
Dry finds the film a muddled, limp thriller that fails to deliver effective horror. She singles out the early kitchen scene’s subtle visual tension as its most interesting cinematic choice.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
25 February 2020 · ★½/4 · Ed Gonzalez
38
Gonzalez argues that the film’s style and suspense come at the expense of meaningfully engaging with abuse. He praises Elisabeth Moss’s performance and the tense craftsmanship, while faulting the film for reducing Cecilia’s trauma to a plot device.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
27 February 2020 · Richard Brody
35*
Brody finds the film’s clever twists and thrills pleasurable but undermined by thin characterization and textureless direction. He praises Elisabeth Moss’s resonant performance while faulting the film for leaving its promising ideas undeveloped.
Read the full review →C
Collider
26 February 2020 · A- · Matt Goldberg
90
Goldberg finds the film nerve-racking, haunting, and thoughtful rather than a fun horror movie. He especially praises Elisabeth Moss’s performance and Whannell’s use of invisibility to convey the terror of domestic abuse.
Read the full review →W
The Wrap
25 February 2020 · William Bibbiani
90*
The critic calls the film an expertly told, terrifying reboot that turns an abusive relationship into effective horror. They especially praise Elisabeth Moss’s bravura performance and the unnerving camerawork that makes the invisible threat felt.
Read the full review →/
/Film
25 February 2020 · 8.5/10 · Chris Evangelista
85
The critic finds the film a timely, intensely effective horror update. They praise Elisabeth Moss’s fierce performance and the suspense built through patient scenes, sound design, and score.
Read the full review →P
Paste
27 February 2020 · 7.5 · Dom Sinacola
83*
Sinacola finds the film bleak, tense, and highly effective as a horror story. He praises its carefully composed frames and Elisabeth Moss’s balanced, powerful performance.
Read the full review →C
Consequence
26 February 2020 · Allison Shoemaker
80*
The critic finds the film a bracing, frightening horror story whose flaws are worth overlooking. She especially praises Elisabeth Moss’s towering performance and the tense camerawork that keeps viewers scanning the frame.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
27 February 2020 · ★★★★ · Rosie Fletcher
80
Fletcher calls the film a fresh, scary, and effective success. She praises Elisabeth Moss’s believable performance and the film’s ability to deliver startling shock scares.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
6 March 2020 · Amber Wilkinson
80*
Wilkinson finds the film an enjoyably tense and effective modern adaptation. She praises the crafty camerawork, which makes empty spaces feel threatening, and Elisabeth Moss’s portrayal of Cecilia’s fear and resilience.
Read the full review →The critic finds the film a bold, thrilling addition to horror, though not as evocative as Jordan Peele’s work. They praise its patient focus on Cecilia and its unsettling use of silence and empty space.
Read the full review →D
Digital Spy
25 February 2020 · Ian Sandwell
75*
Sandwell finds the film a tense, chilling reinvention that delivers effective horror, despite an overlong and convoluted final third. He especially praises Elisabeth Moss’s committed performance and Whannell’s suspenseful use of ordinary spaces to create fear.
Read the full review →The critic finds the film an entertaining, suspenseful thriller that loses much of its scare factor once the monster is revealed. They praise Elisabeth Moss’s performance and the film’s absorbing premise, while faulting its later scares and disappointing climax.
Read the full review →P
Polygon
28 February 2020 · Jenna Stoeber
35*
The critic finds the film’s scares effective but says its plotting and treatment of domestic abuse undermine the story. She especially praises the tense scenes built around apparently empty rooms.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate