Critics’ reviews

The Last Airbender (2010)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 18: 0 positive, 0 mixed, 11 negative.

Back to our review of The Last Airbender

18
Positive
0
Mixed
0
Negative
11

The consensus on The Last Airbender is uniformly negative: all eleven reviews find the adaptation wanting. Most critics describe stiff performances, clumsy dialogue and storytelling that struggles to give the action purpose or momentum. The reviews repeatedly fault Shyamalan’s solemn handling of material they feel needs more humour and energy. The converted 3D draws particular criticism for muddying the images and weakening already ineffective action. Praise is scarce, with no performance or technical department earning broad approval.

The differences concern how much can be salvaged. Empire praises the visual effects and world-building, rejecting the harshest assessments while still finding the film clunky and poorly paced. The Los Angeles Times allows that young children may enjoy it, and Den of Geek singles out Dev Patel as the strongest performer. Collider places particular emphasis on racism and disrespect towards the source material. These exceptions produce little spread in the verdicts: even the more forgiving reviews remain firmly negative.

Empire
· Ian Nathan
30*

The critic finds the film far from the catastrophe some claimed but still disappointingly clunky and botched. He singles out the strong visual effects and world-building for praise while complaining about the childish script, poor pacing, and lack of conviction in the storytelling.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
1 July 2010 · Kenneth Turan
30*

The film is a disappointment aimed squarely at a very young audience, with unsophisticated dialogue, functional but unremarkable effects, and a story that retains some philosophical elements from the source but feels limited. It may appeal to kids despite critical issues, though the whitewashing and 3-D conversion add to its troubles.

Read the full review →
Variety
30 June 2010 · Peter Debruge
30*

The adaptation feels like the last Airbender movie audiences will ever see, undermined by miscasting, uneven acting, and a disastrous last-minute 3D conversion that flattens the action. Shyamalan's ultra-serious approach and awkward handling of the material result in cartoony nonsense rather than epic spectacle.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
30 June 2010
10*

The critic calls the film a leaden, joyless ride and a major misfire from Shyamalan. The director's overly serious style smothers the lighter kids' material, resulting in a dreary CG-heavy adventure rather than an exciting one.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
30 June 2010 · Nick Schager
10*

The critic finds the film a lifeless, work-for-hire adaptation that lacks any of Shyamalan's usual style or skill at spectacle. It suffers from poor rhythm, wooden performances, and ineffective action sequences ruined by clumsy CGI and post-converted 3D.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
12 August 2010 · Peter Bradshaw
10*

The film is mind-bendingly boring with no narrative drive or stakes. Bradshaw singles out the film's title and dialogue for repeated unintentional vulgar humour around the word 'bender'.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
1 July 2010 · A.O. Scott
10*

The film is a catastrophe in execution, with muddy 3-D, muddled storytelling, graceless effects, and clumsy performances that make the already silly premise unbearable. The director's strengths are wasted on a format and adaptation that fail to deliver any visual grace or intrigue.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 August 2010 · Nigel Floyd
10*

The critic finds the po-faced fantasy epic boring and stupefying, with vacuous spectacle, clunking dialogue and fuzzy 3D. It is portrayed as portentous but never profound, laughable but not funny, and action-packed without being exciting.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
2 August 2010 · 1 out of 5 · Ryan Lambie
30*

The critic finds the film a tiresome misfire with a disjointed script, charisma-free cast of child actors, and ineffective CGI action sequences undermined by poor direction and a messy late-added 3D conversion. Dev Patel stands out as the best performer, but the movie is dismissed as another in Shyamalan's recent string of failures.

Read the full review →
Collider
1 July 2010 · F · Matt Goldberg
15

The critic despises the film for its racism, disrespect to the source material, poor performances, effects, and script, calling it the worst movie of 2010.

Read the full review →
/Film
2 July 2010 · 4 out of 10 · Devindra Hardawar
10*

The critic finds the film a singularly misguided adaptation that strips the source material of its emotion, wit, and ferocity, delivering instead a rushed, dialogue-heavy CGI spectacle that fails as both a Shyamalan movie and an Avatar story.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate