Most critics like it, and almost all of them measure it against the first film and find it a little shorter. The praise clusters on the jokes and the songs: the pop-culture riffs arrive at speed, the musical numbers are catchier than before, and Will Arnett’s Batman is named again and again as the comic high point. The animation is admired throughout, and a few reviews single out the opening set piece in Apocalypseburg and the new Queen character as the best of the fresh material.
The reservations are about repetition. Many reviews say the creators are rearranging the same bricks, that the pace drags in the middle and that the message is muddled. The spread is wide. The Guardian thinks it better than the original; Sight and Sound finds the constant irony wearing; The New York Times and Slant read it as a commercial first and a film second. About a fifth of the reviews are outright negative, mostly tired of the self-awareness.
G
The Guardian
28 January 2019 · Peter Bradshaw
85*
The critic finds the sequel even better than the first, with a sophisticated take on gender in the Lego universe. It is praised for its hilarious voice work, ceaselessly inventive pop-culture riffs and nonstop gag-storm screenplay.
Read the full review →E
Empire
26 January 2019 · John Nugent
80*
A hugely fun sequel that repeats the first film's formula but delivers giddy, subversive humour and stunning animation. The critic highlights its self-referential shrewdness and surreal jokes as the main appeal.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
★★★★ · Terry Staunton
80
It's an ultra-slick retread that enchants younger viewers and puts a smile on grown-ups' faces with countless one-liners and an inventive colorful backdrop, though it doesn't offer anything different from the predecessor.
Read the full review →A
The AV Club
26 January 2019 · B · Jesse Hassenger
77
The film offers more songs, laughs, and craft than some spin-offs but less resonance and streamlined magic than the first, opting for a cute but prescriptive worldview.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
8 February 2019 · Charlotte O'Sullivan
70*
A semi-brilliant family movie that doesn't quite match the original or Toy Story sequels, with sophisticated gags and visuals undermined by familiar territory and faltering pace in places. The critic singles out the complex Queen Watevra Wa-Nabi character and the end-credits song for praise.
Read the full review →R
RogerEbert.com
8 February 2019 · Christy Lemire
70*
The sequel is a lot of fun but lacks the consistent cleverness and thrill of the original. It offers catchy songs, meta gags, and a welcome feminist streak, though pacing drags at times.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
5 February 2019 · Justin Chang
65*
It is funny but falls short of the first, with a busy, bouncy and fitfully inspired approach. The puns, one-liners, and blend of sincerity and snark are amusing, and it saves the best for last.
Read the full review →T
Total Film
26 January 2019
65*
The toys are starting to look worn but this is hardly the playdate from hell, acknowledging some fatigue in the sequel while affirming it remains enjoyable.
Read the full review →T
The Telegraph
7 February 2019 · ★★★ · Robbie Collin
60
The film has lost some of the original's awesomeness and feels like it works too hard, but still delivers effortful entertainment. The critic singles out the rip-roaring Mad Max-style opening set piece in Apocalypseburg for praise.
Read the full review →T
The Times
10 February 2019 · ★★★ · Edward Porter
60
The wit and silliness of the jokes hold up well enough to please children and parents alike, with some fun at Chris Pratt's expense. It lacks the original's effervescent novelty, however, as the creators are now just rearranging the same bricks.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
1 February 2019 · ★★★ · Hanna Flint
60
This sequel lacks the original’s breathless inspiration and feels convoluted, but remains a funny and warm-hearted watch with hilarious songs and meta jokes, especially from Batman.
Read the full review →V
Variety
26 January 2019 · Peter Debruge
55*
Mile-a-minute jokes aside, the sequel seems a bit confused about its message. It is faster and denser with catchy songs, but the energy covers for a wobblier foundation and dissipated novelty.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
26 January 2019
50*
The songs are catchier but the jokes aren’t as consistent in this energised but only sporadically engaging follow-up; it explores intriguing ideas about children shedding sweetness to seem cool, yet most pleasures come from familiarity with the characters and world, which aren’t as delightful as in the first film.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
21 February 2019
50*
For those new to the series it is enjoyably hectic and daft, but for others the novelty has faded and it feels formless and stale. It features itchy songs, in-jokes, and live-action scraps about sibling play.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
6 February 2019 · Manohla Dargis
40*
The film is pretty much like the first but less distractingly fun and shiny. It functions more obviously as a commercial, with the mind drifting to thoughts of studio exploitation.
Read the full review →I
IndieWire
26 January 2019 · Jude Dry
30*
The follow-up is a flat re-mix that tells kids sometimes everything's not awesome, delivering a post-Trump LEGO world without the original's spark.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
17 February 2019 · Alex Dudok de Wit
30*
The critic finds the sequel's hyper-ironic tone increasingly annoying despite some great gags, while noting it mines the premise for new themes about human relationships and gender norms. The animation and cultural references provide humor, but the self-awareness undermines its serious points.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
30 January 2019 · Chris Barsanti
30*
The deconstruction of corporatized play gets run through the sequelizer with acrid results; the original fizziness is gone and the film feels forced and commercially motivated.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
26 January 2019 · THR Staff
30*
The sequel has lost much of the original's snap and feels like a repetitive, uninspired knockoff coasting on reused gags and heart-tugging devices.
Read the full review →The sequel grows up with its characters and meta story but becomes more cynical, stuffed with self-aware adult-targeted jokes that weigh down the silliness.
Read the full review →D
Deadline
6 February 2019 · Pete Hammond
85*
The critic says the sequel fulfills and in some ways exceeds high expectations, particularly with its inventive musical numbers. Director Mike Mitchell and the team keep the film humming with character development and heart amid the grittier take.
Read the full review →D
Digital Spy
8 February 2019 · Hugh Armitage
80*
The sequel captures the magic of the first film and builds on it with sharp references and emotional depth. It singles out the real-world framing device for adding genuine emotional resonance beyond the original.
Read the full review →N
NME
7 February 2019 · ★★★★ · Nick Reilly
80
The film is inventive and funny though never quite matching the first. It singles out Will Arnett's Batman and his romance with the Queen for comic high points and meta-humour.
Read the full review →W
The Wrap
6 February 2019 · Yolanda Machado
80*
The critic calls it a delightful all-ages adventure that expands the Lego universe with new worlds, characters, timely messages about heroism and childhood, and catchy tunes. It has the potential to reach even the most cynical viewers through its vivid imagery and themes of connection.
Read the full review →C
Collider
7 February 2019 · B · Matt Goldberg
77
The sequel suffers from some sequelitis and haphazard storytelling that makes it pale next to the original, but the critic still had a blast thanks to razor-sharp humor, stunning animation, and thoughtful themes around toxic masculinity and maturity.
Read the full review →C
Consequence
6 February 2019 · Clint Worthington
70*
The film coasts on series goodwill for much of its runtime with side gags lacking prior snap, but it is almost wholly redeemed by its climax, unexpected plot threads, and surprisingly sweet character development that updates the themes for a darker world.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
8 February 2019 · ★★★½ · Don Kaye
70
The film is witty and fun but labors to stretch the premise and lacks the original's freshness. It singles out the fast and furious pop culture jokes for praise while noting the sequel's inherent lack of novelty.
Read the full review →P
Paste
7 February 2019 · 7.5 · Dom Sinacola
70*
Less revelatory than the first film, it still thoughtfully explores growing up, toxic masculinity, and the value of trying over perfection, delivering a lovely message that everything isn’t awesome but isn’t so bad either.
Read the full review →P
The Playlist
26 January 2019 · B- · Kimber Myers
70
The film is all over the place with fast jokes and enviable energy but is exhausting and not as successful or memorable as the first. It still offers a heartwarming message about there being no one right way to play.
Read the full review →/
/Film
4 February 2019 · 6/10 · Josh Spiegel
60
The sequel is familiar and treads ground already covered by other animated films, though it has charm, wit and catchy music. The story fails to reach the heights of the original.
Read the full review →P
Polygon
7 February 2019 · Karen Han
60*
It doesn’t quite clear the high bar set by the original and lacks some cohesion, but it makes up for that with idiosyncratic ideas, self-referential humor, and moments of brilliance while juggling too many concepts at once.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
8 February 2019 · Donald Munro
50*
The film is fun but relies on too many throwaway jokes and references that are repeated ad nauseum and interfere with pacing. It feels thin compared to the original, with a heavy-handed message and less subtlety.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate