Critics’ reviews

The Limey (1999)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 68: 6 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Limey

68
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics take The Limey for what it is: a slight revenge plot made sadder and more interesting by the way Soderbergh assembles it. The praise clusters around the editing, the scrambled timelines and the decision to use footage of the young Terence Stamp from Poor Cow as flashbacks, which several reviews single out as the film’s most affecting idea. The casting of Stamp and Peter Fonda as relics of the 1960s is widely admired, as is Ed Lachman’s photography, and the general reading is of a rueful, nostalgic picture about ageing and retirement rather than an action film. The reservations are about Lem Dobbs’s script, which even admirers find thin, and about whether the style carries more weight than the story can bear. The spread is wide. Empire dismisses it as stilted and overstyled, and Eye for Film finds Stamp wooden, a view no other review shares.

Slant Magazine
24 October 2022 · Chuck Bowen
85*

The critic describes The Limey as a terse and atmospheric crime film with an unusually vivid sense of regret achieved through submerged textures and cross-cutting timelines. It functions as a perfect storm of technique, intuition, and personal taste that opens a vortex of longing and nostalgia for lost cinematic waves.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 March 2002 · Scott Tobias
80*

The critic sees The Limey as a clever and meaningful homage to fractured late-'60s classics like Point Blank and Petulia that scrambles basic genre elements into something fresh and formally exciting. It edges into a sad, rueful tone that lends poignancy to Stamp's quest and the stars' ebbing careers.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · GA
80*

This low-budget crime movie is funny, touching and assured, milking the fish-out-of-water premise with imagination and wit. Stamp delivers a superb lead performance supported by strong turns from Fonda and others, with Soderbergh's narrative playfulness singled out as a highlight.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
18 May 1999 · festival review · Peter Bradshaw
75*

The critic describes Soderbergh's thriller as a compelling duel between two 1960s relics, with Terence Stamp as a vengeful Cockney ex-con and Peter Fonda as his sleazy target. He singles out the film's innovative use of clips from the 1967 film Poor Cow for flashbacks instead of recasting or aging the actor.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· Philip Strick
70*

Soderbergh's latest is a fragmented, memory-like revenge tale that prioritises visual and linguistic play over straightforward narrative. The critic highlights the film's elegant framing and allusions while noting its capricious attention and the standout performance by Amelia Heinle.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
4 October 1999 · Anthony Lane
70*

The critic finds power in the film's oblique European-style approach and glimpses of the protagonist's past rather than its deadened morality or revenge plot. He singles out the use of clips from the young Terence Stamp in Poor Cow for emotional resonance.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Andrew Collins
30*

The film is a stilted, slight and bizarre fish-out-of-water yarn that fails to balance tension and comedy. Stamp's performance and the casting of 1960s icons are highlights but cannot save the thinly plotted, overstylised result.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
8 October 1999 · Kevin Thomas

The review describes it as a sleek, stylish contemporary L.A. noir that offers familiar genre satisfactions while evoking the lost idealism of the 1960s through its casting and references. It singles out the adroit casting of 1960s icons and Ed Lachman’s lush photography.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
8 October 1999 · Roger Ebert

The critic praises Soderbergh's ironic, visually inventive take on a basic revenge story centered on two aging criminals. He singles out the use of flashbacks from Terence Stamp's earlier work and the film's focus on retirement and mortality over action.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
8 October 1999 · NYT Critic’s Pick · Janet Maslin

The review calls the film a piquant nostalgic throwback to 1960s noir style, with the best chance among Soderbergh's films of becoming a sentimental favorite. It singles out the revisiting of Terence Stamp and Peter Fonda as charismatic 1960s stars and the cool panache of the cinematography.

Read the full review →
Variety
18 May 1999 · festival review · Emanuel Levy

The review notes that Soderbergh turns a routine revenge thriller into an accomplished, contemplative character-driven drama about family and generational issues. It singles out the bravura acting ensemble and the impressive technical aspects like cinematography and editing, despite script weaknesses.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 January 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
45*

The critic praises Soderbergh's stylish direction, camera tricks, and time-shuffling for creating a seductive noir look but criticizes Lem Dobbs's flashy script and Terence Stamp's wooden performance as the vengeful ex-con Wilson.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate