Critics’ reviews

The Lion in Winter (1968)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 79: 10 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Lion in Winter

79
Positive
10
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics like it, and the praise falls almost entirely on the two leads. Katharine Hepburn and Peter O’Toole are named again and again for their sparring as Eleanor and Henry II, and the screenplay is the second most common point of admiration: literate, quick and savage in its account of a royal family carving up an inheritance. Several reviews also note the early appearances of Anthony Hopkins and Timothy Dalton, and Anthony Harvey’s direction is credited with keeping out of the way of the script.

The reservations are about the film’s stage origins. The New York Times finds the climaxes and the specifically cinematic passages the weakest parts, and The New Yorker goes further, arguing that campy material has been treated with too much solemnity and that Hepburn leans on her own persona. Eye for Film, otherwise admiring, finds some of the supporting turns hammy. The spread is narrow apart from that one outright dissent, and more recent reviews tend to see it as a Christmas film about a family that cannot stand each other.

The Times
21 February 2025 · ★★★★★ · Kevin Maher
100

The critic calls it the original Succession and highlights the star-studded cast and literate screenplay. The verbal sparring and inheritance drama at Chinon castle are singled out as the film's strengths.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
9 December 2016 · Kenneth Turan
90*

This restored classic still roars with its splendid language, pageantry, and spectacular lead performances by Hepburn and O'Toole as battling royals. The focus on verbal jousting and the strong cast, including early turns by Hopkins and Dalton, keeps it compelling despite its theatrical roots.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
4 November 1968 · Roger Ebert
90*

The film succeeds with its literate script and intelligent direction, standing out for handling ideas and emotions effectively in a believable historical setting. Ebert praises the strong performances, especially by Peter O'Toole, Katharine Hepburn, and newcomers Anthony Hopkins and Timothy Dalton.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
2 April 2009 · A-
90

The critic praises the film as a lively Plantagenet family soap opera full of savage catfights and witty dialogue. Hepburn and O'Toole are singled out for their matching, delicious performances as the scheming royal couple.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 January 1968
90*

An intense, fierce personal drama put across by outstanding performances from Peter O'Toole and Katharine Hepburn, with excellent work by director Anthony Harvey and a generally strong cast. The literate adaptation stands out for its treatment of treachery in Henry II's family.

Read the full review →
Empire
28 July 2006 · Ian Nathan
80*

The critic praises this rousing historical melodrama for its two powerhouse performances from Katharine Hepburn and Peter O’Toole. Director Anthony Harvey is singled out for creating a splendid medieval setting that supports the family intrigue.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
22 December 2016 · Farran Smith Nehme
75*

The critic notes the film's 1968 critical reception and commercial success despite some detractors, highlighting its enduring appeal as a holiday favorite centered on a dysfunctional royal family.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
31 October 1968 · Renata Adler
70*

The movie is mostly outdoorsy and fun with witty, if dated, dialogue and solid acting from the ensemble, particularly the younger actors. It remains faithful to the play with energetic scenes but feels weakest in its climaxes and cinematic touches.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
2 November 1968 · Pauline Kael
30*

The film suffers from too much inappropriate integrity, elevating the campy stage material into ponderous historical drama with overwrought emotions. O'Toole gives a robust, histrionic performance that almost saves it, while Hepburn's portrayal draws too much on her own persona.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
8 September 2003 · Keith Dudhnath
90*

The film is made stunning by the performances of Hepburn and O'Toole, who thrive on the tight script and deliver pure brilliance in their roles as Eleanor and Henry II. Anthony Harvey's direction keeps the focus on the performances and script without overdoing it, resulting in a wonderful film that one must see, though some supporting performances veer toward hammy.

Read the full review →
Collider
23 December 2023 · Rhianna Malas
80*

The critic presents the 1968 film as an ideal holiday movie due to its depiction of a royally dysfunctional family feuding over power during Christmas. She singles out the sharp dialogue, Katharine Hepburn's sass, and the relatable messiness of family gatherings for praise.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
17 August 2008 · ★★★ · Cara McGuigan
60

The review praises the venomous family power struggles and especially Katherine Hepburn's magnificent performance as the scheming Eleanor, calling the cast's energy a sight to behold.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate