Critics’ reviews

The Long Walk (2025)

21 reviews from 21 publications. Critics’ score 74: 14 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Long Walk

74
Positive
14
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics take to The Long Walk, and the spread is narrow: the bulk of the reviews land as solidly positive, with a small cluster of mixed notices and a single outright rejection. The praise gathers around the two lead performances, from Cooper Hoffman and David Jonsson, and around the friendship between their characters, which nearly every review names as the thing that carries a punishing premise. Francis Lawrence is credited with keeping the film bleak and unflinching without tipping into cruelty, and several reviews approve of the screenwriter’s changes to Stephen King’s novel. The reservations are about the material rather than the making: a walking contest is hard to dramatise, the comparisons to The Hunger Games are frequent and not always flattering, and a few critics find the message muddled or the villain too broad. The Telegraph is the lone dissenter, judging the premise anti-cinematic and the film quickly short of ideas.

Slant Magazine
7 September 2025 · Justin Clark
85*

The review presents the film as a harrowing mirror to reality and a passion play about class solidarity. It singles out the script’s empathy for all characters and the radical defiance found in the central friendship.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Jeremy Aspinall
80

The critic calls it a searing yet thoughtful adaptation of Stephen King’s first novel that twists the American Dream into something macabre. It features marvellous performances, especially from Cooper Hoffman and David Jonsson, as an often agonising horror directed with expertise in dystopian survival tales.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
10 September 2025
80*

The critic describes it as an uncompromising, unrelentingly bleak and utterly brutal Stephen King adaptation that is one of the most powerful in recent years. It features a poignant emotional heart that powers the narrative through its grim trek.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
5 September 2025 · Frank Scheck
80*

The critic finds Francis Lawrence’s adaptation bleak and bruising yet emotionally affecting overall. He singles out the warm friendship between the two leads and the heartfelt family relationships for particular praise.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
10 September 2025 · B · Jacob Oller
77

The review calls the adaptation a chummy, harrowing Stephen King B-movie that respectably plods through its hellish metaphor. It singles out the sublime moments of connection and solidarity among the boys amid the violence.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
11 September 2025 · Ryan Lattanzio
75*

The critic praises Lawrence and the screenwriter for delivering the source material’s dark-hearted vision without any saccharine hope. He highlights the film’s unflinching totalitarian nightmare and the lead performances.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
12 September 2025 · Clint Worthington
75*

The methodical premise is difficult to dramatize, but Lawrence and the cast maintain its pace through focus on the budding friendship between sensitive Ray Garraty and optimistic Peter McVries amid the brutal contest. The tension builds from the growing exhaustion and inevitable violence, though some backstories remain thin and one performance feels miscalibrated.

Read the full review →
Vulture
3 September 2025
75*

The critic describes the film as a bleak yet sentimental take on camaraderie under brutality, likening it to a dude version of The Hunger Games. He praises David Jonsson’s standout performance as the character who insists on solidarity.

Read the full review →
Time Out
27 August 2025
70*

The critic presents it as a brutal Stephen King adaptation charting a Hunger Games-style walking contest to the death in a totalitarian America, with strong performances from the young cast and Mark Hamill.

Read the full review →
Variety
12 September 2025 · Siddhant Adlakha
70*

Although it doesn’t reach the melodramatic highs for which it aims, director Francis Lawrence’s film is nonetheless a tense and surprising dystopian drama steeped in personal and national ethos, with an excellent cast that leads toward its beating heart via questions of how best to approach the world when everything feels hopeless. It remains intriguing, if not outright riveting, for the vast majority of its runtime despite some open-ended elements.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
10 September 2025 · 3/3/2 · David Jenkins
60

The critic sees it as a violent Stephen King adaptation about a death march that offers contemporary commentary on a depraved America. Cooper Hoffman and David Jonsson deliver superb lead performances, but the film lacks originality and is overloaded with cynicism.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
12 September 2025 · Katie Walsh
60*

The film tackles what it means for young people to volunteer for organized barbarism out of desperate need, as well as the consumption of their destruction as entertainment, with a strong ensemble showcasing the dehumanizing torture they endure. Lawrence's sparing style locates the fable in an unspecified future, but the message remains muddled, at once hopeful and despairing.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
12 September 2025 · ★★ · Robbie Collin
40

The critic finds this Stephen King adaptation fundamentally limited by its anti-cinematic premise of an endurance trek, despite some strong performances. It is compared unfavourably to The Hunger Games as a low-budget version that quickly runs out of ideas.

Read the full review →
Empire
5 September 2025 · Jamie Graham

The critic finds the Stephen King adaptation gruelling and grimly violent in its depiction of a deadly dystopian contest, with the camera unflinchingly capturing the physical and psychological toll on the teenage participants. Praise is given to the bold changes by the screenwriter that preserve the source's bleakness while highlighting moments of camaraderie, defiance and a touching friendship between the leads.

Read the full review →
Financial Times
11 September 2025 · ★★★★☆ · Danny Leigh

The critic praises the adaptation as a quietly radical take on the novel, set in an economically wrecked America and stripped back visually compared to The Hunger Games. It highlights the defiant humanity in the friendships formed amid the lethal contest.

Read the full review →
The Times
11 September 2025 · ★★★☆☆ · Tom Shone

The review describes the film as a gruelling dystopian thriller that mixes The Hunger Games with Squid Game but is hampered by King’s philosophising. Strong acting conveys the physical toll of the march effectively.

Read the full review →
Collider
2 September 2025 · 9/10 · Jeff Ewing
90

The critic praises the film's focus on the walkers' lives and emotions, calling it tense, moving, and complex. It stands out as one of the best Stephen King adaptations and horror movies of the year thanks to its exceptional cast and layered character development.

Read the full review →
/Film
2 September 2025 · 9/10 · BJ Colangelo
90

The critic hails it as an emotionally obliterating all-time great Stephen King adaptation and one of the best films of 2025. She praises the focus on the boys' relationships and performances, especially Hoffman and Jonsson, for delivering raw vulnerability and devastating emotional impact without flinching from the brutality.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
10 September 2025 · ★★★★ · Linda Marric
80

The critic calls it a bleak, unflinching, and unexpectedly moving adaptation of Stephen King's early novel, one of the strongest yet. She singles out the central performances of Cooper Hoffman and David Jonsson for grounding the grim premise with humanity and tenderness amid the physical and psychological torment.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
12 September 2025
75*

The critic views the film as a gut-wrenching Vietnam War allegory that updates Stephen King’s story to highlight ongoing American economic and systemic violence against its youth. They praise the direction for making the grueling march feel viscerally miserable and thematically resonant but fault its narrow focus on American victims while ignoring the war’s impact on Vietnam.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
10 September 2025 · 4 out of 5 · David Crow

The adaptation is very good overall, with a stripped-down focus on young men confronting mortality through camaraderie and friendship. It praises the strong ensemble performances, particularly David Jonsson and Cooper Hoffman, while noting some tonal issues and broad villain characterization prevent it from being great.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate