Critics’ reviews

The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001)

13 reviews from 13 publications. Critics’ score 88: 11 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring

88
Positive
11
Mixed
0
Negative
0

Most critics warmly endorse Peter Jackson’s adaptation, praising its conviction, casting and ability to make Middle-earth feel like a place with its own history and rules. Praise clusters around the production design, effects and landscapes, with the battles and atmosphere of menace giving the spectacle force. Several reviews also stress the attention to character and the emotional weight of the journey, finding more than technical accomplishment in its treatment of Tolkien’s story.

Reservations centre on pacing, tone and what the adaptation loses. Variety finds the episodic structure repetitive and the length occasionally tiring, while RogerEbert.com regrets the shift from the hobbits and Tolkien’s gentleness towards action and larger characters. The Guardian is a clear dissenter, admiring the landscape but finding too little plot complication and too much humourless self-importance. The spread is therefore wider than the predominantly enthusiastic reception suggests: even the scale that many admire can become a source of fatigue.

Time Out
12 January 2026 · ★★★★★ · TCh
100

The critic finds the film creates a sophisticated universe that abides by its own mythic laws rather than condescending to audiences. The grandeur of the Gothic design and the film's menace are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2001 · Colin Kennedy
95*

The critic hails Peter Jackson’s film as the start of the greatest fantasy epic in cinema history. They single out its impeccable casting, passionate construction, emotional range, and sublime moments that transcend the genre.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
19 December 2001 · Kenneth Turan
90*

The critic hails the film as an intelligent, imaginative and passionate work that thrillingly captures the sweeping story with verve and spirit, paying close attention to character while delivering spectacle and wonder.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
5 December 2001
90*

The critic calls the film a miracle that faithfully captures the spirit of Tolkien while standing on its own as one of Hollywood's most ambitious movies. Complex and engaging characters along with state-of-the-art effects and moral significance are highlighted as strengths.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
4 December 2001 · David Hunter
90*

The critic praises Jackson's adaptation as well-made and well-cast with no reservations about the rest of the trilogy. It singles out the masterful pacing that justifies the long runtime and the top-notch production design, cinematography, effects, costumes, makeup, and score.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
19 December 2001 · ★★★½/4 · Roger Ebert
88

The critic finds the film a well-crafted modern sword-and-sorcery epic that transcends its genre but shifts focus away from the hobbits toward larger characters and action sequences, making it less true to Tolkien's gentler vision than hoped.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
12 December 2001 · Ed Gonzalez
85*

The critic lauds Jackson's evocation of Middle-earth's territorial and mythic elements through striking visuals and battles. It singles out the gripping visions when Frodo wears the ring and the overall jaw-dropping set pieces that make the three-hour runtime soar.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
19 December 2001 · Scott Tobias
85*

The critic calls the film a spectacle of eye-popping proportions with Jackson bringing personality and a light touch to the adaptation. It singles out the visceral battle sequences and the innovative construction of kingdoms and monsters.

Read the full review →
Total Film
19 December 2001
85*

The review praises the film’s breath-snatching beauty, blood-chilling terror and orc-slicing action. It distinguishes the adaptation from lighter fare like Harry Potter through its atmosphere of impending doom and intense action.

Read the full review →
Variety
4 December 2001 · Todd McCarthy
80*

The critic calls it a vigorous and faithful adaptation that scrupulously renders characters and worlds with impressive physical production values and effects, though the episodic structure can feel repetitive and the long running time wearisome at times.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
14 December 2001 · ** · Peter Bradshaw

The critic praises the brilliantly realised Middle Earth landscape and world-building but finds the film lacking in plot complication and too self-important and humourless, ultimately unable to make the required leap of faith into its universe.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
19 December 2001 · Critic's Pick · Elvis Mitchell

The critic praises Peter Jackson's heroic adaptation that compacts the novel into a gripping action epic while preserving a sense of loss and mournfulness amid the sacrifices and adventures of the fellowship.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
23 November 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
80*

The film succeeds in capturing the essence of Tolkien's saga with excitement and poetic quality intact. The director and cast deliver a grand, immersive journey into evil, highlighted by Ian McKellen's masterful Gandalf.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate