
Most critics respond warmly to Nicolas Roeg’s disorientating science fiction, with praise clustering around David Bowie’s casting and performance. The reviews repeatedly find vulnerability beneath his unearthly presence, giving the film’s treatment of exile and alienation an emotional centre. Roeg’s surreal imagery, landscapes and elliptical editing also draw broad admiration, particularly for making Earth seem unfamiliar and allowing mood and feeling to carry scenes that resist straightforward explanation.
The reservations concern narrative coherence, pacing and how much emotional connection survives the fragmentation. Several favourable reviews acknowledge wandering stretches, unfocused scenes or imperfections, but regard these as tolerable costs of the film’s ambition. The spread runs from enthusiasm to one mixed assessment: Collider finds the storytelling incoherent and the adaptation poor, while still praising Bowie and the visuals. Polygon offers a narrower dissent within an otherwise positive response, finding the film sad without being particularly moving.
L
Little White Lies
9 September 2016 · 4/5/5 · David Jenkins
100
The review hails the 4K restoration of Roeg's masterpiece, with Bowie astonishing as the alien visitor building a tech empire. It singles out the film's elliptical editing, pessimistic yet hopeful vision of a volatile world, and status as one of the director's most unique achievements.
Read the full review →T
The Times
9 September 2016 · ★★★★★ · Kate Muir
100
David Bowie is back in cinemas as the alienated alien in the re-release of Nicolas Roeg’s surreal film. The critic singles out Bowie’s beyond-cool performance as stealing the show in a smorgasbord of strangeness.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
8 September 2016 · Peter Bradshaw
85*
Nicolas Roeg’s 1976 sci-fi about an alien visitor played by David Bowie is rereleased and looks more exotic and fascinating than ever. The critic singles out Bowie’s sui generis central performance for its unselfconscious gentleness and vulnerability.
Read the full review →E
Empire
23 January 2007 · Kim Newman
80*
The film is a demanding, disorientating yet beguilingly beautiful work that buries its plot but rewards repeated viewings with its suggestion that Earth is the strangest planet. Roeg's direction captures striking landscapes and the alien lead's unsettling presence amid earthly distractions.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
20 June 2011 · Anthony Lane
80*
The critic finds the film retains its cool, confounding strangeness as a sci-fi dedicated to how freakish Earth would seem to a visitor. It singles out the piercing tristesse of the final scene and Roeg's pessimistic vision of abandoning the hero to his fate.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
29 May 1976 · Vincent Canby
80*
The review calls the film beautiful science fiction that is mainly about exile and being an alien on Earth. It singles out David Bowie's inspired, extraordinary performance as the space visitor for praise.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
5 September 2016 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80
The review calls it a haunting classic with a riveting Bowie performance as the alien sidetracked by human flaws. It singles out sublime moments like eye extractions and desert landscapes, while noting the second half wanders and some elements are dated.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
3 July 2011 · Mark Olsen
75*
The review highlights the film's cult status and strange imagery about aliens, technology, corporate conspiracy and government interference. It praises the director's approved version and Bowie's powerful performance as the ultimate stranger in a strange land.
Read the full review →R
RogerEbert.com
13 July 2011 · ★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
75
The critic praises David Bowie's eerie, urbane performance as the alien visitor and the film's focus on character and ideas over plot. He notes it is slow at times with unfocused scenes but finds it a unique product of 1970s ambition.
Read the full review →V
Variety
24 March 1976 · Robert Hawkins
75*
The review establishes Roeg as one of the most talented new filmmakers and calls the film a demanding but stunning visual and aural achievement. It singles out Bowie's inspired casting and performance as the ethereal visitor and Candy Clark's winning contribution.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
· Tom Milne
70*
The critic praises the film's emotional continuity over intellectual logic and Bowie's convincing portrayal of vulnerability as an alien. It explores themes of human connection, disorientation, and parallel worlds through elliptical storytelling and motifs like trains and incarceration.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
27 December 2008 · Matt Noller
70*
Roeg delivers a singular, haunting sci-fi experience that strips narrative to essentials in favor of tone and emotion through elliptical editing and disruptive sound design. The film is aggressively imperfect yet treasured for its ambitious failures and glorious moments.
Read the full review →The critic calls the film a hallucinatory, heartfelt and wholly bizarre sci-fi masterpiece that endures due to its exploration of alienation and commerce, singling out Bowie's captivating, hypnotic performance as its central strength.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
27 March 2011 · Ryan Lambie
90*
The film is an experimental, one-of-a-kind piece of filmmaking about alienation, standing alongside Roeg’s finest work. It is worthy of enduring attention thanks to its committed, moving central performances, especially Bowie’s.
Read the full review →R
The Ringer
26 November 2018 · Adam Nayman
90*
The critic praises the film as a rich meditation on spiritual emptiness and materialism, highlighting Bowie's perfect casting and the director's virtuoso weirdness in atmosphere, imagery, and eroticism.
Read the full review →/
/Film
3 November 2025 · Debopriyaa Dutta
85*
Roeg's cult sci-fi remains hypnotic, profound and densely layered nearly 50 years later, with Bowie integral as the alien emitting a timeless aura. It is an ambitious, complex and beautiful experimental triumph open to many interpretations.
Read the full review →H
HeyUGuys
4 April 2011 · ★★★★ · Nick Turk
80
Roeg's film stands the test of time thanks to superb casting of Bowie as the alien and its decision not to spoon-feed explanations. Its bold surreal imagery and unconventional structure make it a standout sci-fi experience unlike anything else.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
16 July 2008 · Jennie Kermode
75*
Roeg's sprawling, complex story of an alien who loses his way on Earth is full of dazzling images and striking scenes. The film uses visual beauty as a metaphor for the seductiveness of a world that proves culturally overwhelming for its protagonist.
Read the full review →P
Polygon
18 March 2026 · Jesse Hassenger
70*
The critic describes the film as challenging and authentically alien due to its fragmented storytelling and elliptical style, praising its striking visuals and Bowie's anchoring performance while noting it is sad but not particularly moving.
Read the full review →C
Collider
13 July 2023 · Luna Guthrie
50*
The critic finds the film an acquired taste that is incoherent and poorly adapted from the novel, but praises Bowie's uniquely perfect casting and performance along with the surreal visuals and memorable scenes.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate