Critics’ reviews

The Man Who Wasn't There (2001)

15 reviews from 15 publications. Critics’ score 76: 7 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Man Who Wasn't There

76
Positive
7
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics respond favourably to the Coens’ restrained crime drama, with praise clustering around Roger Deakins’ black-and-white photography and Billy Bob Thornton’s performance as the withdrawn barber Ed Crane. The reviews admire the precise period detail, dry humour and philosophical concerns, finding plenty to consider beneath the noir plotting. Thornton’s stillness is generally seen as expressive rather than empty, while the photography gives the small-town setting depth and a sense of confinement.

The main divide concerns how much feeling survives all that control: some critics find unexpected warmth, while others find the film cold and difficult to engage with. Screen Daily admires the craftsmanship and Thornton but finds the cerebral approach emotionally distancing; the Evening Standard argues that the story loses its way before the finish. Slow pacing, a passive protagonist and familiar Coen quirks recur as reservations, though most reviews regard them as limitations rather than decisive failures.

The AV Club
29 March 2002 · Keith Phipps
85*

The Coens craft a precise, funny, and thematically rich black-and-white noir that blends genre conventions with deeper philosophical and historical resonance. Thornton’s alienated everyman anchors a world where existential themes play out in everyday settings.

Read the full review →
Total Film
26 October 2001
85*

The black-and-white cinematography by Roger Deakins adds depth, and there is more emotional warmth than usual with Fargo-esque humanity. The Coens deliver a gripping, amusing and accomplished work that will delight their fans.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
80*

The Coens riff on James M. Cain in a chilly black-and-white style with a passive, uncommitted hero. It is a gripping, unusual and challenging work from consistently brilliant filmmakers, though slowly paced with an off-putting lead.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Andrew Collins
80

The Coens deliver a complex and clever period crime drama that is more introspective than their usual comic mania. Sublime acting from Thornton and McDormand, aided by Deakins' photography, makes it the most introspective entry in their canon and on a par with Fargo.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · GA
80*

The Coens' meditative and arty crime movie, inspired by Cain but neither noir nor thriller, is a brave and largely successful attempt to explore the inner workings of someone who simply doesn't feel the way most people do. It is helped no end by Billy Bob Thornton's supremely eloquent performance.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
22 October 2001 · Ed Gonzalez
75*

The Coens deliver a visually elegant noir tribute with strong period atmosphere and a sympathetic lead performance from Thornton. The film is undercut by overly familiar Coen quirks and reliance on noir tropes.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
14 May 2001 · festival review
60*

The Coens' ambitious black-and-white period piece is sumptuously mounted and visually striking, with a brilliant performance by Thornton as a banal small-town barber. However, its detached, cerebral approach deconstructs film noir sources from a coldly calculated perspective, making it easier to admire than to like or engage with emotionally.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
50*

The film is finely fabricated art with ravishing black-and-white photography and interlocking events that give pleasure for much of its length. It runs out of story before the end, however, with a detour into science fiction that feels like a fatal misstep.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
31 October 2001 · Kenneth Turan

The review calls the film an existential film noir comedy that is chilly yet amusing. It praises the Coens' assured fun with genres and the crystalline black-and-white photography that recreates a claustrophobic noir world.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
2 November 2001 · Roger Ebert

The critic praises the elegant black-and-white cinematography and Billy Bob Thornton's mournful performance as the trapped barber Ed Crane. He notes the film's leisurely pace as a potential drawback in its noir plotting but ultimately admires its stylistic assurance.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
26 October 2001 · Peter Bradshaw

The critic calls it the Coen brothers' masterpiece and the best American film of the year. He singles out Billy Bob Thornton's reticent, stoic performance as the taciturn barber Ed Crane for particular praise.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
29 October 2001 · Anthony Lane

The critic commends the precise black-and-white style and exacting eye for small-town minutiae. He complains about some over-the-top performances and finds the film's overall finesse nerdish and unbreathable.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
31 October 2001 · A. O. Scott

The review describes the film's progression from a passive, invisible protagonist to one who becomes ruinous yet glowing. It singles out the Coens' intelligent movie-ness, generosity with details, and surprising bits of acting for praise.

Read the full review →
Variety
14 May 2001 · **

The review finds the Coens' noir tale of adultery, blackmail and murder less tasty than their best work or Cain's, with a passive title character. It notes the beautiful craftsmanship but criticizes the muted action and lack of dramatic heat.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
24 August 2001 · ★★★★½ · Angus Wolfe Murray
90

The critic finds the film's central character too passive and unengaging despite the Coens' ironic twists and strong supporting cast. The black-and-white neo-noir is undermined by unconvincing plot elements and an overly expressionless lead performance.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate