Critics’ reviews

The Matrix (1999)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 82: 5 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Matrix

82
Positive
5
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to The Matrix, with praise concentrated on its visual effects and action choreography. Slow motion, shifting perspectives and martial arts give the fights a distinctive style, and the reviews repeatedly credit the Wachowskis with finding inventive ways to put them on screen. Several also admire the ambition of its science-fiction premise and its questions about reality and identity. The Hollywood Reporter singles out Hugo Weaving within a strong cast.

The main disagreement concerns the writing: Total Film praises intelligent plotting, while other reviews find pretension, thin characters or ideas that the action fails to develop. The spread runs from enthusiastic endorsement to a mixed response, rather than outright rejection. Time Out supplies the sharpest reservation, arguing that an ingenious opening hour gives way to routine action. Even the more doubtful reviews acknowledge the technical achievement; they differ over how much it compensates for the storytelling.

Empire
· Ian Nathan
95*

The Wachowskis deliver a dazzling, inventive sci-fi action film that reinvents the cyberpunk genre with groundbreaking 'flo-mo' visuals and high-octane sequences. It is technically mind-blowing, stylish, and incredibly cool, making for a fabulous experience despite a loony plot.

Read the full review →
Total Film
11 June 1999
95*

The Matrix is the action movie of the millennium, a no-limits filmmaking triumph that blends intelligent plotting with spectacular, gravity-defying fight scenes and visuals. The Wachowskis have created an ultra-cool, brain-blowing futuro-fight fest that will be remembered alongside Star Wars.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· Philip Strick
75*

The Wachowskis deliver startling innovations in method with a feast of tricks, stunts and perspectives that combine slow-motion effects and martial-arts choreography into astonishing images. The film is less reassuring in its message about the Matrix and its thin characters, leaving the prospect of a superhero-led future uncertain.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
50*

The first hour works as an ambitious dystopian fantasy with ingenious reality switches, slick camerawork and impressive effects blending body horror and comic-strip style. The promising premise is wasted as it becomes a routine action picture with paper-thin characters and overlong high-concept hokum.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
· David Hunter

The critic calls the film a cyber sci-fi blowout with stunning visual effects and advanced storytelling that will open big and become a hit. The Wachowskis are praised for crafting a brain-twisting thriller with crowd-pleasing action and strong performances, especially from Hugo Weaving.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
31 March 1999 · Janet Maslin

The critic highlights the phenomenal martial arts dynamics and inventive special effects as the film's strongest assets. The plotting is described as notably pretentious.

Read the full review →
Collider
31 March 2024 · A- · Meredith Loftus
90

The critic calls The Matrix a revolutionary sci-fi classic whose innovative visual effects (especially bullet time), philosophical depth, and dynamic kung fu action continue to resonate. They single out the film's accessible exploration of themes like conformity, technology, and identity for particular praise while noting a minor weakness in one subplot.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 January 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
90*

The critic praises the film's visually astonishing and audacious cinematic style, particularly its use of slow motion and gun battles, and its complex visionary take on a post-rational age. They recommend being seduced by it without demanding explanations, highlighting Keanu Reeves' transformed performance.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate