Critics’ reviews

The Mexican (2001)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 52: 4 positive, 3 mixed, 5 negative.

Back to our review of The Mexican

52
Positive
4
Mixed
3
Negative
5

The reviews split almost down the middle, and the one thing nearly everyone agrees on is James Gandolfini. Whatever critics think of the film around him, his weepy, vulnerable hit man is repeatedly named the best thing in it, and several say the picture only comes alive once he arrives and starts talking to Roberts. Those who like it call it a shaggy-dog story: slight, whimsical, with tangy dialogue and a split structure that keeps things moving.

The reservations gather around the two stars. Many critics find Pitt and Roberts do not mesh, and several describe the film as veering between goofy violence and solemnity without settling on a tone. The spread is wide, from cheerful curio to outright dud. The Guardian is the odd one out in finding even the Gandolfini subplot mishandled, while Collider, writing long after release, argues the film is a subversive arthouse piece that deserves a cult reappraisal.

Evening Standard
10 April 2012
70*

The critic views the film as an eclectic, anything-goes shaggy-dog story with charm in its split structure and quirky elements. Gandolfini is highlighted as the best asset for his human and vulnerable portrayal of the hit man.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
2 March 2001 · Roger Ebert
70*

The critic praises the film's focus on the quirky relationship between Samantha and the hit man Leroy rather than the Pitt-Roberts pairing, finding it special and witty. He singles out the psychobabble dialogues and Gandolfini's character for bringing depth and surprises.

Read the full review →
Variety
27 February 2001 · Todd McCarthy
70*

The review describes the film as a slight but enjoyable whimsical shaggy-dog story with more star power than substance, ricocheting between goofy violence and endearing moments. It singles out Gandolfini's touching and genuine supporting turn as the most authentic element.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TCh
65*

This hokey-jokey comic thriller doesn't add up to much but remains an engaging curio. The parallel storylines buzz with smart zigzags and tangy dialogue, though extraneous flashbacks mire the plot somewhat.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
2 March 2001 · Nathan Rabin
55*

The film is uneven and often slack when focused on Pitt's character, but improves significantly with the arrival of Gandolfini, whose rapport with Roberts provides the film's strongest and most emotionally resonant moments.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
2 March 2001
50*

The review finds the film only half as funny as it should be but notes it avoids being too churlish given the surrounding comic environment. It highlights James Gandolfini's portrayal of the weepy hit man Leroy as the casting coup.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
2 March 2001 · Kenneth Turan
40*

The review notes the film's misdirection and desire to be hip and offbeat but concludes it cannot pull it off despite the stars' efforts. It praises the best performance coming from a supporting player rather than the leads.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Colin Kennedy
30*

The critic finds the film a patchy genre piece that fails to live up to its ambitions as a star vehicle. Gandolfini is singled out for praise as the standout performer who brings natural drama to his scenes.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
27 April 2001 · Peter Bradshaw
30*

The critic finds the film an implausible comedy-thriller that fails due to poor chemistry between Pitt and Roberts and weak performances. He singles out the mishandled subplot involving Gandolfini's character as particularly disappointing.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
5 March 2001
30*

The critic calls the romantic comedy a dud with Pitt and Roberts not meshing, criticizing the film's hapless veering between facetiousness and solemnity. Pitt's jittery performance is singled out as uncentered and indulgent to watch.

Read the full review →
Collider
23 March 2026 · Liam Gaughan
75*

The critic argues that despite its initial negative reviews, The Mexican is an unusual, subversive arthouse film rather than a standard thriller, deserving a cult reappraisal for its quirky humor, profound moments, and western influences.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
27 April 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
40*

The critic finds the central couple's chemistry unconvincing and the film tonally uneven, with Pitt and Roberts failing to generate sparks while Gandolfini steals scenes. Verbinski treats the caper as a light romp but lacks the skill of Jonathan Demme in the genre.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate