Film review

The Mexican

2001 · Directed by Gore Verbinski · 2h 03m · MPA R

In a sentenceBrad Pitt and Julia Roberts in one film, and the best thing in it is the man who kidnaps her

ActionComedyCrimeRomance

Jerry (Brad Pitt) runs errands for a Los Angeles crime outfit, badly. He owes the jailed boss Margolese (Gene Hackman), and Margolese’s lieutenant Nayman (Bob Balaban) offers one last job to clear the debt: go to Mexico and bring back an antique pistol known as the Mexican, said to carry a curse. His girlfriend Samantha (Julia Roberts) wants him out of the business and on the road to Las Vegas with her; when he takes the job, she leaves alone. Jerry finds the pistol in a dusty town and loses it at once. Samantha, meanwhile, is taken in Las Vegas by Leroy (James Gandolfini), a hit man who means to hold her until the gun comes home.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Gore Verbinski keeps his two stars apart for most of the picture, and the half with James Gandolfini in it is the one worth watching. The rest is Brad Pitt losing a pistol in the dust, and it outlasts the joke.

The Mexican puts Brad Pitt and Julia Roberts on the same poster and then keeps them in different countries for most of its 123 minutes. J. H. Wyman’s script is built on that separation. Jerry (Pitt) is sent south to fetch a pistol; Samantha (Roberts) is on her way to Las Vegas when Leroy (James Gandolfini) puts her in his car and keeps her there. Gore Verbinski cuts between the two, one a slapstick errand and the other a long conversation, and only one of them is a film we wanted to keep watching.

It is the conversation. Leroy is a professional who takes Samantha’s romantic troubles more seriously than she does, and Gandolfini plays him as a large, patient man who listens with his whole face. Roberts stops performing brightness, which she does in most of her comedies, and simply argues with him, in a diner, in a motel, in the front seat of a car, about whether a relationship that has stopped working is worth finishing. We were moved by a scene in the motel where Leroy tells her something about his own life, quietly, and then gives her advice he has no business giving. It is a better love story than the one the film is nominally telling, and it is between two people who are not in love.

The Mexican half is where the running time goes. Jerry arrives, is handed the pistol, and loses it at once: a car thief (Richard Coca) drives off with it while he is standing in the road, and the rest of his story is a sequence of attempts to get it back, involving a donkey, a dog and several people who shoot at him. Pitt plays it twitchy, all shrugs and half-finished sentences, and for a while it is likeable. By the fourth mishap we were checking how much of him was left, and there was a great deal. The strand has no shape. Things happen to Jerry, then other things do, and the pistol changes hands about once every ten minutes.

It looks good while it does. Dariusz Wolski shoots the Mexican scenes in a hard yellow light that turns the plaster to bone and the sky nearly white, and Cecilia Montiel’s town of tin roofs, painted shutters and a single bar looks lived in rather than dressed. Colleen Atwood keeps Samantha in the same rumpled clothes for days, which is right for a woman who left in a hurry. Alan Silvestri brings in trumpets and a Spanish guitar and lets them wander. The legend of the pistol arrives in sepia flashbacks, the picture jittering as if run through an old projector, and the story changes each time someone tells it. Craig Wood drops these in more than once, and each time the film stops dead while a wedding goes wrong.

The two halves are meant to argue with each other: he learns something about commitment in the dust while she learns something about it in the car. They do not. When the film finally puts its stars back in the same frame it has less than half an hour left and a plot to settle, and it settles it with Gene Hackman, who appears late as Margolese and is given a good deal to explain. J.K. Simmons turns up as Ted, another emissary with a gun, and Bob Balaban’s Nayman is sweatily good in his few scenes. None of them is on screen long enough to matter.

Verbinski’s first film, Mouse Hunt, from 1997, was a cartoon with people in it, and two years after this he would make Pirates of the Caribbean. Here he is trying for something in between, a caper that becomes a Western that becomes a talk about love, and the joins show. The film has been talked up in some quarters since as a misunderstood oddity. We would not go that far. It is an ordinary film with one extraordinary supporting performance in it.

See it for Gandolfini and Roberts, and be honest with yourself about the rest. At home the Mexican half is easier to forgive, because you can get up and make tea during the donkey. The 15 certificate covers a fair amount of blood and a lot of swearing, most of it Pitt’s.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

52
Positive
4
Mixed
3
Negative
5

The reviews split almost down the middle, and the one thing nearly everyone agrees on is James Gandolfini. Whatever critics think of the film around him, his weepy, vulnerable hit man is repeatedly named the best thing in it, and several say the picture only comes alive once he arrives and starts talking to Roberts. Those who like it call it a shaggy-dog story: slight, whimsical, with tangy dialogue and a split structure that keeps things moving.

The reservations gather around the two stars. Many critics find Pitt and Roberts do not mesh, and several describe the film as veering between goofy violence and solemnity without settling on a tone. The spread is wide, from cheerful curio to outright dud. The Guardian is the odd one out in finding even the Gandolfini subplot mishandled, while Collider, writing long after release, argues the film is a subversive arthouse piece that deserves a cult reappraisal.

Evening Standard
10 April 2012
70*

The critic views the film as an eclectic, anything-goes shaggy-dog story with charm in its split structure and quirky elements. Gandolfini is highlighted as the best asset for his human and vulnerable portrayal of the hit man.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
2 March 2001 · Roger Ebert
70*

The critic praises the film's focus on the quirky relationship between Samantha and the hit man Leroy rather than the Pitt-Roberts pairing, finding it special and witty. He singles out the psychobabble dialogues and Gandolfini's character for bringing depth and surprises.

Read the full review →
Variety
27 February 2001 · Todd McCarthy
70*

The review describes the film as a slight but enjoyable whimsical shaggy-dog story with more star power than substance, ricocheting between goofy violence and endearing moments. It singles out Gandolfini's touching and genuine supporting turn as the most authentic element.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TCh
65*

This hokey-jokey comic thriller doesn't add up to much but remains an engaging curio. The parallel storylines buzz with smart zigzags and tangy dialogue, though extraneous flashbacks mire the plot somewhat.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
2 March 2001 · Nathan Rabin
55*

The film is uneven and often slack when focused on Pitt's character, but improves significantly with the arrival of Gandolfini, whose rapport with Roberts provides the film's strongest and most emotionally resonant moments.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
2 March 2001
50*

The review finds the film only half as funny as it should be but notes it avoids being too churlish given the surrounding comic environment. It highlights James Gandolfini's portrayal of the weepy hit man Leroy as the casting coup.

Read the full review →

Cast

If you liked this, try…