Critics’ reviews

The Mission (1986)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 57: 3 positive, 2 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of The Mission

57
Positive
3
Mixed
2
Negative
2

The reviews split almost evenly, with a slight lean towards approval, and they agree on what works before they disagree on whether it is enough. Nearly every critic singles out the Iguazu Falls and the opening image of the crucified missionary sent over the water; more than one says the location steals the film from its actors. Jeremy Irons and Robert De Niro are praised for physical, largely wordless performances, and Variety finds Ray McAnally in the supporting cast the most enjoyable presence on screen. Joffé’s refusal to prettify the period is admired.

The reservations cluster on the script. Several critics call the film lumpy or structureless, arguing that it states its points about church, state and money without dramatising them, and the climactic battle is described as botched or disorganised by more than one. The spread is wide: the Los Angeles Times finds it passionate and haunting, while Time Out, reviewing decades later, finds it curiously uninvolving and lacking exactly that passion. The later reviews are no warmer than the originals.

Los Angeles Times
14 November 1986 · Sheila Benson
80*

Benson praises the film as haunting spectacle that is serious and passionate, establishing Joffé as a great action director through his collaboration with the cinematographer and editor. She singles out the Iguazu Falls as the scene-stealers and Jeremy Irons' pure performance.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
30 July 2009 · B · Alex von Tunzelmann
77

The critic finds the film powerful and atmospheric, with a strongly political view of the conflict between church, state and capitalism. It is praised for its magnificent filming, accurate historical depiction of the destruction of South American native culture, and superbly recreated battle sequences, though noted as oddly structureless.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
75*

The critic highlights the film's ambitious scope and the strong, physically expressive performances from Robert De Niro and Jeremy Irons in a thematically complex historical drama about faith, redemption and political upheaval. Joffé's restrained, un-prettified vision is noted as admirable though it may have contributed to the film's commercial underperformance.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
31 October 1986 · Vincent Canby
50*

Canby calls the film a singularly lumpy movie that states points without dramatizing them effectively. He singles out the riveting opening sequence with the crucified missionary at the Iguassu Falls as the film's most compelling moment.

Read the full review →
Variety
festival review
50*

The review finds the script cardboard thin and the characters labeled rather than developed, though it notes some stunning scenes using the Iguazu falls to advantage. It singles out supporting performances like Ray McAnally's as the most enjoyable while criticizing the botched climactic battle.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
14 November 1986 · Roger Ebert
40*

Ebert finds the film visually striking but ultimately incoherent and lacking emotional pull, despite strong individual elements. He singles out the spectacular waterfall locations and opening image for praise while criticizing the disorganized narrative and battle scenes.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · RR
30*

The film is magnificent in its epic scope and stunning Amazon setting but curiously uninvolving, lacking passion despite strong performances from De Niro and Irons and a brutal climax.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate