Critics’ reviews

The Mummy (1999)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 67: 4 positive, 5 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Mummy

67
Positive
4
Mixed
5
Negative
0

The reviews split fairly evenly between warm and lukewarm, with nobody dismissing the film outright and nobody quite loving it either. The praise clusters on the effects department, which most critics credit with the film’s best moments, from the shape-shifting mummy to the swarms of creepy-crawlies, and on Brendan Fraser, whom several find a likeable, goofy hero. Stephen Sommers’s direction is generally called assured and rarely dull, and the Indiana Jones comparison comes up again and again, mostly in the film’s favour. The reservations cluster just as tightly: a weak, silly script, broad performances and stereotypes that more than one critic finds offensive. Sight and Sound thinks it trades the original’s atmosphere and mystery for a string of theme-park rides, and Variety finds no suspense in it at all. The Los Angeles Times reckons it harmless fun for teenage boys, which is roughly where the consensus settles.

RogerEbert.com
7 May 1999 · Roger Ebert
80*

Ebert finds the film good trash, cheering nearly every minute despite its flaws in script and direction. He singles out the fun action sequences and silly dialogue for enjoyment.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Caroline Westbrook
75*

The critic finds the film a lot of fun despite its dumb script and stereotypes, praising its blend of Indiana Jones-style antics, impressive special effects and chaste romance as escapist entertainment. Brendan Fraser is highlighted as a likeable hero, with the effects department singled out for creating spine-tingling moments.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
25 June 1999 · Peter Bradshaw
70*

The film is fun, with terrific set pieces and assured direction from Stephen Sommers. It abandons the original's dark metaphorical power in favor of healthy, risk-free scariness and Indiana Jones-style action.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
3 May 1999 · David Hunter
65*

The film is undermined by weak writing but succeeds as an ambitious actioner with imaginative set pieces and effects that deliver chills and thrills. It rarely has a dull moment and evokes classic adventure films through strong technical work.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
3 May 1999 · Anthony Lane
65*

Lane notes the film has a blast of fun and roots for Brendan Fraser but criticizes the ignorance, racism, and lack of character depth. He singles out the shape-shifting mummy effects and action hilarity for praise amid complaints about stereotypes.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Alan Jones
60

The digitally manipulated villain meets adversaries in vibrant action and epic adventure, with ancient curses, archaeological treasure hunts and romantic elements. Sommers embroiders the story excessively with gruesome modern additions, but Fraser brings goofy macho enthusiasm and Vosloo provides brooding menace.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
7 May 1999 · Stephen Holden
60*

Holden describes it as a gaudy comic video game with cheesy effects and no pretenses to seriousness. He praises the lavish but silly special effects and the over-the-top horror spoof elements.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
7 May 1999 · Kenneth Turan
50*

Turan says it's harmless fun for young teenage boys with cartoonish effects and adventure, but drags on and is yucky. He singles out the special effects and Indiana Jones-inspired elements for appeal to juveniles.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 July 1999 · Kim Newman

The film is a mostly entertaining series of theme-park rides but sorely misses out on magic, atmosphere, mystery and romance. It features over-the-top action, unlikable heroes, cardboard villains, irritating comic bits and offensive stereotypes.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · DA

This overlong and thematically meandering film has mostly downmarket performances, but its tongue-in-cheek approach makes it enjoyable for the settings, humour, chases, creepy crawlies and state-of-the-art SFX. It aspires to Raiders but falls short of Spielberg.

Read the full review →
Variety
3 May 1999 · ** · Todd McCarthy

McCarthy calls it pure hokum with lame comedy and no suspense. He singles out the broad performances and feeble dialogue for complaint, while noting abundant effects.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 January 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
80*

The critic praises the film as delivering class effects, dashing adventure, laughs and non-stop action, while also being scary. They highlight Stephen Sommers' original direction that avoids Spielberg clones, along with strong performances from Brendan Fraser as the beefcake hero and Rachel Weisz as the brainy, sexy lead.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate