Critics’ reviews

The Pianist (2002)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 75: 8 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Pianist

75
Positive
8
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics respond warmly to The Pianist, praising Polanski’s restraint and his refusal to sentimentalise Szpilman’s survival under Nazi occupation. The strongest notices find that the detached approach makes the violence more disturbing, while Adrien Brody’s understated performance keeps the suffering specific without turning survival into heroism. Praise also centres on the photography, production design and attention to historical detail, with several reviews finding grim humour and sustained tension within the disciplined style.

The disagreement is substantial rather than a matter of minor reservations: the same distance that many admire leaves others unmoved. Some otherwise favourable reviews find the opening conventional, with exposition and stiff dialogue delaying the more compelling focus on Szpilman. Variety respects the restrained acting and production values but finds little urgency or fresh dramatic insight. Empire is more firmly opposed, judging the film monotonous and short of tension despite Brody’s physical commitment and the authentic detail.

Los Angeles Times
27 December 2002 · Manohla Dargis
95*

The critic calls the film a monumental achievement that captures the surrealism and detachment of the Holocaust without sentimentality. She singles out Polanski's intellectual distance and Brody's restrained performance for allowing focus on the larger devastation.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
27 December 2002 · A. O. Scott
90*

The critic praises Polanski's objective and authoritative handling of Szpilman's survival story as one of the definitive films on Jewish life under the Nazis. He highlights the bleak humor and the lead performance by Adrien Brody as evoking Beckett-like existential figures.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Sloan Freer
80

Polanski's poignant, authentic and objective Holocaust drama stands as a companion piece to Schindler's List, with its power lying in disciplined style and attention to detail that avoids simplistic clichés.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
24 January 2003 · Peter Bradshaw
80*

The critic views Polanski's Holocaust drama as a weighty and moving film and a genuine achievement. They praise the stunning cinematography, production design and the film's sustained seriousness despite some stately dialogue.

Read the full review →
The Independent
24 January 2003
80*

The critic highlights the film's power from the dreadful accumulation of authentic, random horrors drawn from Polanski's personal history and Szpilman's memoir, creating poignant images of survival through luck rather than heroism. It notes the lack of Spielberg-like organization or deep psychological inquiry but concludes it is something that won't be forgotten.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
15 November 2002 · Ed Gonzalez
75*

The first half feels conventional and burdened by exposition, a disappointment for Polanski fans. The second half achieves near-transcendence through distant, elegant photography of the Warsaw ghetto and a focus on isolation and music.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · GA
70*

The film starts inauspiciously with a clichéd script and functional family scenes, but improves markedly once focused on Szpilman's solitary survival, rendered with subtlety and benefiting from Polanski's personal insight.

Read the full review →
Variety
26 May 2002 · festival review · Todd McCarthy
60*

The critic finds the film a solid and respectable work with impressive production values and restrained acting, but notes it plays as conventional and lacks personal urgency or emotional impact. He praises the dispassionate approach drawn from the source memoir but laments the absence of tension and fresh dramatic insight.

Read the full review →
Empire
★★ · Ian Freer
40

The critic finds the film a slow-paced, monotonous experience devoid of dramatic tension and emotional contours despite its authentic details from Polanski's own experience. It praises the intimacy of the survivor's story and Brody's physical performance but notes it lacks the terror and sweep of comparable films like Schindler's List.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
1 May 2003 · Richard Combs

The review examines how the city of Warsaw and the protagonist's family are progressively dismantled under Nazi occupation, leaving the pianist as a solitary survivor hiding in the ruins. It highlights the film's focus on physical and psychological shrinkage amid the ghetto's dissolution and deportations.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· David Thompson

Polanski delivers a work of sustained tension and ferocious clarity, a near-perfect marriage of subject and artist, distinguished by its objective adherence to fact, grim humour and restraint rather than conventional Holocaust drama tropes.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
22 January 2003 · Angus Wolfe Murray
85*

Polanski delivers a magnificent historical record that feels fresh and avoids sensationalism or sentimentality compared to other Holocaust films. The director excels at maintaining tension in this survivor's tale of hiding and endurance in occupied Warsaw.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate