Critics’ reviews

The Player (1992)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 89: 6 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Player

89
Positive
6
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are strongly positive about The Player, with praise clustering around Altman’s Hollywood satire, Tim Robbins’s performance as a studio executive and the combination of thriller plotting with cynical comedy. Critics repeatedly single out the extended opening take for its technical control. Robbins draws particular praise for making the executive’s charm and oiliness coexist, while the overlapping dialogue helps establish the industry’s corporate culture. Most critics find the film both entertaining and sharp about the commercial pressures shaping what gets made.

The differences concern depth and pace rather than any broad disagreement over its merits. The New York Times describes the morality tale as skin-deep, placing more weight on its genial irreverence than its capacity to expose Hollywood. The Skinny cautions that the slow pace and long takes may not suit everyone. These are limited reservations within a broadly enthusiastic consensus, rather than signs of a substantial critical divide.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · David Parkinson
100

This swingeing satire is the best movie about Tinseltown since Sunset Blvd., with a masterly opening shot, cynical plot and towering performance from Tim Robbins as the oily studio executive. Hollywood at its worst is told by Hollywood at its best.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Caroline Westbrook
90*

The critic praises the film as a brilliant modern classic and one of the best Hollywood satires. They single out the taut thriller plotting, the terrific eight-minute single-take opening shot, and strong performances especially from Tim Robbins.

Read the full review →
Time Out
25 January 2012 · GA
90*

Altman transforms Tolkin's thriller into the most honest and hilarious Hollywood satire ever, with superb performances, photography and a seamless blend of comedy and tension. Its democratic style and film-within-a-film structure make it complex and revealing about cinema and society.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
12 May 2022 · Joe Flockhart
85*

The film is a biting, intelligent satire on Hollywood's corporate culture, unoriginality and executives' arrogance. Its strength lies in the showy cinematic craft, overlapping dialogue and cynical commentary on how commercial pressures sanitise subversive ideas.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
25 June 1992 · Derek Malcolm
85*

The critic calls it the most accurate picture of what it takes to make films in Los Angeles and the most entertaining ironic comedy produced there in a long time. He notes it functions as a comment on post-Reaganite America and highlights Altman's distinctive vision behind the story.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
13 April 1992 · Terrence Rafferty

The picture is a brilliant dark comedy about the death of American filmmaking, with a charming studio executive as the pure incarnation of forces squeezing life out of adventurous movies. Altman turns the self-reflective Hollywood world into a fun house of grotesque distortions that reveal paradoxical truths, mixing suspense, comedy and icy satire with exhilarating nonchalance.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
10 April 1992 · Vincent Canby

Altman delivers an entertaining, flip and genially irreverent Hollywood satire that announces his return as a gregarious filmmaker. The film is a skin-deep morality tale and send-up of the industry, told through a murder story centered on a studio executive who receives screenplay pitches and commits a crime.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
5 February 2008 · ★★★★ · Kieran Westbrook
80

The critic praises Altman's clout and the film's portrayal of the cutthroat Hollywood industry with its strong cast and story. They note the director's slow pace and long takes may not suit everyone but highlight the strong story and intriguing ending.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate