Film review

The Player

1992 · Directed by Robert Altman · 2h 04m · MPA R

In a sentenceHollywood treats an original idea with the caution normally reserved for a suspicious expense claim

MysteryDramaThrillerComedy

Griffin Mill (Tim Robbins) is a Hollywood studio executive who listens to screenplay pitches and works in a business where commercial prospects carry more weight than originality. Around him, film-making is a corporate occupation, with ambition and self-interest shaping what reaches the screen. Robert Altman’s film follows Griffin through this professional world as its workplace comedy develops into a crime thriller. Michael Tolkin adapts his own novel for the screenplay, and the cast includes Greta Scacchi, Peter Gallagher, Cynthia Stevenson and Vincent D’Onofrio.

Fi1m review

Robert Altman’s Hollywood satire is funny, sour and gripping, with Tim Robbins making a studio executive’s self-interest horribly plausible. A little more interest in the people this business damages would have made it bite harder.

We recommend The Player for its sharp, patient attention to a man whose job allows him to judge everybody else’s stories. Robert Altman’s Hollywood satire is also an absorbing thriller, and its jokes stay funny when the pressure rises. Griffin Mill, played by Tim Robbins, is a studio executive in a business that has learnt to make self-interest sound like professional judgement. Michael Tolkin’s screenplay, adapted from his own novel, gives that professional confidence a criminal test. Altman is interested in how readily we accept Griffin as our guide.

Jean Lépine’s cinematography announces the film’s confidence in an opening shot without a cut. Its length gives us time to attend to the business around Griffin, rather than simply waiting for his story to begin. Altman’s overlapping dialogue makes the competing speakers worth listening to, even when their ideas hardly deserve the attention. We laughed at the screenplay pitches, then felt slightly ashamed of how readily we enjoyed the executive’s side of the exchange. The ease with which talk about making films becomes talk about selling them is the uncomfortable joke.

Robbins makes Griffin’s authority convincing enough for us to understand why people bring him their hopes. There is charm in the performance, and just enough of it to make his arrogance bearable company. That puts us in an awkward position as the thriller gathers force: we want to know what happens to a man we would not want deciding our future. Altman does not constantly interrupt that involvement to tell us Griffin is objectionable. Robbins has already made the point.

Editors Maysie Hoy and Geraldine Peroni preserve the space for conversation that makes the suspense work. The film can take its time without losing our interest in Griffin, although occasionally a joke has rather too long to settle. Thomas Newman’s score is effective accompaniment, but it is the talk we remember: competing voices make professional exchanges feel difficult to escape. The cutting is particularly good at sustaining our attention without forcing the comedy to hurry.

Ken Kaufman and Stephen Altman’s production design helps us believe in the workplace around Griffin. It looks capable of carrying on without him, which matters in a story about an executive who assumes his judgement counts for so much. The setting never needs to make every colleague a monster for the business to seem unkind. Much of the cruelty is already there in the screenplay’s treatment of originality as a commercial inconvenience.

A satire about film executives has an obvious difficulty: mocking their taste can become an easy way of flattering ours. Altman mostly avoids that by keeping Griffin attractive company and letting the suspense involve us in his concerns. Yet the moral discomfort remains lighter than it might have been. The people this culture brushes aside are harder to feel for than the man at its centre, because he gets so much of the film’s attention. We seldom feel much grief for the ambitions this business discourages.

Allow its 124 minutes some concentration: the competing talk is part of the pleasure, and half-listening diminishes it. The humour should still work without a working knowledge of the film business. Spend an evening with Griffin, but keep him away from anything you have written.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

89
Positive
6
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are strongly positive about The Player, with praise clustering around Altman’s Hollywood satire, Tim Robbins’s performance as a studio executive and the combination of thriller plotting with cynical comedy. Critics repeatedly single out the extended opening take for its technical control. Robbins draws particular praise for making the executive’s charm and oiliness coexist, while the overlapping dialogue helps establish the industry’s corporate culture. Most critics find the film both entertaining and sharp about the commercial pressures shaping what gets made.

The differences concern depth and pace rather than any broad disagreement over its merits. The New York Times describes the morality tale as skin-deep, placing more weight on its genial irreverence than its capacity to expose Hollywood. The Skinny cautions that the slow pace and long takes may not suit everyone. These are limited reservations within a broadly enthusiastic consensus, rather than signs of a substantial critical divide.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · David Parkinson
100

This swingeing satire is the best movie about Tinseltown since Sunset Blvd., with a masterly opening shot, cynical plot and towering performance from Tim Robbins as the oily studio executive. Hollywood at its worst is told by Hollywood at its best.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Caroline Westbrook
90*

The critic praises the film as a brilliant modern classic and one of the best Hollywood satires. They single out the taut thriller plotting, the terrific eight-minute single-take opening shot, and strong performances especially from Tim Robbins.

Read the full review →
Time Out
25 January 2012 · GA
90*

Altman transforms Tolkin's thriller into the most honest and hilarious Hollywood satire ever, with superb performances, photography and a seamless blend of comedy and tension. Its democratic style and film-within-a-film structure make it complex and revealing about cinema and society.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
12 May 2022 · Joe Flockhart
85*

The film is a biting, intelligent satire on Hollywood's corporate culture, unoriginality and executives' arrogance. Its strength lies in the showy cinematic craft, overlapping dialogue and cynical commentary on how commercial pressures sanitise subversive ideas.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
25 June 1992 · Derek Malcolm
85*

The critic calls it the most accurate picture of what it takes to make films in Los Angeles and the most entertaining ironic comedy produced there in a long time. He notes it functions as a comment on post-Reaganite America and highlights Altman's distinctive vision behind the story.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
13 April 1992 · Terrence Rafferty

The picture is a brilliant dark comedy about the death of American filmmaking, with a charming studio executive as the pure incarnation of forces squeezing life out of adventurous movies. Altman turns the self-reflective Hollywood world into a fun house of grotesque distortions that reveal paradoxical truths, mixing suspense, comedy and icy satire with exhilarating nonchalance.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 1993

Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Film Editing
Nominated
Best Writing, Adapted Screenplay

If you liked this, try…

Sunset Boulevard poster93

Sunset Boulevard

1950 · Hollywood’s appetite for people receives a harsher, more mournful examination.

Contempt poster

Contempt

1963 · Film-making, money and a damaged relationship, with little patience for professional excuses.

The Bad Sleep Well poster

The Bad Sleep Well

1960 · Corporate respectability conceals wrongdoing in another patient, sour study of institutional power.

In the Loop poster

In the Loop

2009 · Professional language does the dirty work while ambitious people protect their positions.

The Square poster

The Square

2017 · Another privileged cultural gatekeeper finds his good opinion of himself difficult to maintain.