Critics’ reviews

The Polar Express (2004)

13 reviews from 13 publications. Critics’ score 58: 3 positive, 8 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of The Polar Express

58
Positive
3
Mixed
8
Negative
2

The reviews lean mixed, with praise clustering around the train sequences, wintry landscapes and technical ambition. Several critics find the journey more engaging than the story carrying it, admiring the sense of movement and occasional delicate visual touches. Tom Hanks’s multiple roles also draw praise, while some reviews find warmth in the quieter moments. There is broader agreement on the film’s visual achievement than on its ability to make its Christmas sentiment convincing.

The divide is chiefly over emotional warmth: The Hollywood Reporter finds heart alongside the technical achievement, while Variety considers the film emotionally cold and its story thin. Other reservations concern stretched plotting, limited character development and sentimentality. Responses to the animation also vary, from admiration for performance capture to discomfort with the digital faces. The spread is wide, although most verdicts sit between enthusiasm and rejection, acknowledging the spectacle without being fully persuaded by the storytelling.

The Hollywood Reporter
23 October 2004 · festival review · Duane Byrge
90*

Byrge gives the film a warmly positive verdict, calling it a technical landmark with heart. He especially praises its kinetic train sequences, tender moments, and lively performances by Tom Hanks and the supporting cast.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
70*

Nathan finds the film sentimental and overly committed to one-dimensional Christmas ideals, but ultimately thrilling and extraordinary. He particularly praises the train’s exhilarating motion and a lyrical sequence in which a lost ticket journeys through the wintry landscape.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It also provides no praise or complaint to report.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
26 October 2004 · Mike Goodridge
64*

The review text is inaccessible beyond its headline and metadata. Its verdict and any singled-out praise or complaint are not available.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
10 November 2004 · A. O. Scott
64*

The page is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. No specific praise or complaint can be established from the available text.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Sloan Freer
60

Freer finds the film technically impressive, though the review’s full verdict is not available here. The review singles out the performance-capture animation and Tom Hanks’s multiple roles for praise.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
6 November 2004 · ★★/4 · Ed Gonzalez
50

Gonzalez finds the film emotionally hollow, criticizing its synthetic spectacle and Christmas-pageant thrills. He praises a brief image of wind making a snowman appear to wave goodbye, but says the film lacks subtlety and grace.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· DA
50*

The review considers the film inconsequential overall, despite its technical achievement. It singles out the modern computer-animation techniques as a demonstration of the medium’s potential.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
3 December 2004 · Peter Bradshaw
30*

Bradshaw finds the film initially enjoyable but ultimately overwhelmed by schmaltz, leaving it reasonable yet inferior to Pixar. He praises its opening stretch for blending Spielberg, Norman Rockwell and Roald Dahl.

Read the full review →
Variety
24 October 2004 · David Rooney
25*

Rooney judges the film an ambitious misstep: technically impressive but emotionally cold, with a thin story. He praises the painterly landscapes and says the traditional animation is more captivating than the digital characters.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
24 November 2009 · ★★★★ · Mark Pickavance
80

Pickavance finds the film charming and increasingly classic, though it loses momentum after reaching the North Pole. He praises its magical train sequences and criticizes the 3D presentation for draining color and causing headaches.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
8 December 2014 · Emily Breen
65*

Breen finds the re-release tentatively charming, though its dated effects and unsettling character designs may trouble adults. She praises the film’s immersive visual world and highlights the moving duet between the Hero Girl and Lonely Boy.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
2 January 2005 · Josh Morrall
55*

Morrall finds the film visually impressive and morally appealing, but says its thin story is stretched too far. He praises the motion-capture animation while criticizing the plot, character development, and pacing.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate