A passenger train curves across a bridge beneath the moon
Film review

The Polar Express

2004 · Directed by Robert Zemeckis · 1h 40m · MPA G

In a sentenceA Christmas train ride that makes a persuasive case for looking out of the window

Hero Boy (voiced by Daryl Sabara, with motion capture by Josh Hutcherson) boards a train bound for the North Pole. The Conductor (Tom Hanks) oversees the journey, while Hero Girl (voiced by Nona Gaye), Know-It-All (Eddie Deezen) and Lonely Boy (voiced by Jimmy Bennett) share the ride. The children travel through a wintry landscape towards their Christmas destination.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Robert Zemeckis makes the train journeys in The Polar Express thrilling, but its digital children remain awkward company. The thin story and insistent sentiment leave us with an uneven Christmas film whose scenery is its chief attraction.

Robert Zemeckis gives The Polar Express enough movement to make a train journey feel like an adventure in itself. It is an uneven Christmas film, thrilling in motion and much less engaging when it asks us to love its passengers. The performance-capture animation is central to that difficulty, since the children attract attention for reasons that have little to do with their personalities. There is pleasure here, but it arrives in stretches.

The wintry scenery is the strongest invitation. Cinematographers Robert Presley and Don Burgess give the journey a sweep that makes the railway worth following, and production designers Rick Carter and Doug Chiang provide a setting more appealing than the people travelling through it. The images can be painterly without losing the excitement of a train moving through snow. For a while, simply watching it travel is enough, and the scenery holds our attention without assistance from the dialogue.

The faces are harder work. We found the children unsettling, because the animation repeatedly made us notice their artificiality when we ought to have been following their feelings. That is a serious problem for a film so dependent on tenderness, and it is not solved by the visible effort that has gone into capturing a performance. Tom Hanks brings welcome liveliness to the Conductor, though even his presence cannot make the digital passengers feel entirely comfortable to be around.

Daryl Sabara voices Hero Boy, with Josh Hutcherson supplying the motion capture, while Nona Gaye voices Hero Girl and Eddie Deezen plays Know-It-All. Those character names give some indication of how broadly the children are written. Robert Zemeckis and William Broyles Jr. leave too little room for them to become interesting company between the attractions. The actors have warmth to offer, but the screenplay keeps their personalities too simple to support a film lasting 100 minutes.

A lost ticket’s passage through the wintry landscape is a more successful use of the animation. It lets an ordinary object hold our attention through movement, without demanding that a digital face persuade us of anything. Editors Jeremiah O’Driscoll and R. Orlando Duenas help the travelling sequences move with purpose, but they cannot keep the thin story from feeling extended. The pauses between the railway thrills are where we start noticing how little there is to carry the children forward.

Alan Silvestri’s score suits the scale of the journey, although its encouragement to feel wonder becomes wearing alongside the film’s insistence on Christmas sentiment. There is already enough to enjoy in the sight of the train and its snowy surroundings. The music works better when it supports that movement than when it presses for tenderness the characters have not earned. Too often, the film seems unwilling to let a modest pleasure remain modest.

A family fantasy needs room for doubt, mischief and the occasional feeling that is not the approved one. Here, the narrow view of Christmas makes all that encouragement feel rather compulsory. Children mainly interested in a train adventure may be less troubled by this than adults expected to share the feeling. Watch it for the railway, if that is enough of a reason; do not expect the passengers to win you over.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

58
Positive
3
Mixed
8
Negative
2

The reviews lean mixed, with praise clustering around the train sequences, wintry landscapes and technical ambition. Several critics find the journey more engaging than the story carrying it, admiring the sense of movement and occasional delicate visual touches. Tom Hanks’s multiple roles also draw praise, while some reviews find warmth in the quieter moments. There is broader agreement on the film’s visual achievement than on its ability to make its Christmas sentiment convincing.

The divide is chiefly over emotional warmth: The Hollywood Reporter finds heart alongside the technical achievement, while Variety considers the film emotionally cold and its story thin. Other reservations concern stretched plotting, limited character development and sentimentality. Responses to the animation also vary, from admiration for performance capture to discomfort with the digital faces. The spread is wide, although most verdicts sit between enthusiasm and rejection, acknowledging the spectacle without being fully persuaded by the storytelling.

The Hollywood Reporter
23 October 2004 · festival review · Duane Byrge
90*

Byrge gives the film a warmly positive verdict, calling it a technical landmark with heart. He especially praises its kinetic train sequences, tender moments, and lively performances by Tom Hanks and the supporting cast.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
70*

Nathan finds the film sentimental and overly committed to one-dimensional Christmas ideals, but ultimately thrilling and extraordinary. He particularly praises the train’s exhilarating motion and a lyrical sequence in which a lost ticket journeys through the wintry landscape.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It also provides no praise or complaint to report.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
26 October 2004 · Mike Goodridge
64*

The review text is inaccessible beyond its headline and metadata. Its verdict and any singled-out praise or complaint are not available.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
10 November 2004 · A. O. Scott
64*

The page is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. No specific praise or complaint can be established from the available text.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Sloan Freer
60

Freer finds the film technically impressive, though the review’s full verdict is not available here. The review singles out the performance-capture animation and Tom Hanks’s multiple roles for praise.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Polar Express worth watching?
The Polar Express is worth watching only for its train journeys through snow, and we scored it 58. Robert Zemeckis makes the railway sequences thrilling, but the performance-capture children are unsettling company and the story is too thin to fill 100 minutes. Children keen on a train adventure will enjoy it more than adults asked to share its insistent Christmas sentiment.
How long is The Polar Express, and what is it rated?
The Polar Express runs 1h 40m and is rated G by the MPA in the US. It is an adventure and animation film.
Where can I watch The Polar Express in the US?
The Polar Express is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $4.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does The Polar Express compare to Spirited Away?
The Polar Express is the weaker of the two, and Spirited Away is the one we would recommend to adults and children alike. Both follow a child on a strange journey, but Hayao Miyazaki fills his spirit bathhouse with creatures worth getting to know, while Zemeckis gives us scenery worth watching and passengers we never warm to. Choose the earlier film unless a Christmas train is the whole point.
What should I watch after The Polar Express?
After The Polar Express, try Spirited Away (2001, Fi1m 92): A child’s strange journey where the creatures have personalities worth getting to know. Then Hugo (2011, Fi1m 76): Railway machinery and a lonely child, with more curiosity about both; and Klaus (2019, Fi1m 77): Christmas sentiment supported by expressive animation and characters allowed to be difficult.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2005

Nominated
Best Sound
Nominated
Best Sound Editing

BAFTA Film Awards, 2005

Nominated
BAFTA's Children & Young People Award - Feature Film

Critics' Choice Awards, 2004

Nominated
Best Animated Feature

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Snowman (1982) · not reviewed yetA winter journey whose quiet animation makes its moments of wonder feel earned.

  2. Spirited Away (2001, Fi1m 92)A child’s strange journey where the creatures have personalities worth getting to know.

  3. Hugo (2011, Fi1m 76)Railway machinery and a lonely child, with more curiosity about both.

  4. Klaus (2019, Fi1m 77)Christmas sentiment supported by expressive animation and characters allowed to be difficult.

  5. The Railway Children (1970) · not reviewed yetFor the pleasure of trains and children who feel like people.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever