Critics’ reviews

The Prestige (2006)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 68: 6 positive, 2 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of The Prestige

68
Positive
6
Mixed
2
Negative
2

Most critics respond favourably to The Prestige, with praise centred on Nolan’s intricate, non-linear storytelling and the performances of Bale and Jackman. The rivalry gives the elaborate plotting a firm centre, while the period setting and polished filmmaking help sustain the illusion. Supporters find the film absorbing and enjoy being misdirected; even several less enthusiastic reviews acknowledge the strength of the acting and the care of the construction.

The spread is wide, however, and the main disagreement concerns how much feeling survives all that ingenuity. Some critics find psychological depth in the rivalry; others see calculating characters whose obsessions offer little emotional involvement. The final stretch also divides opinion, earning praise for its payoff and complaints about excess complication. Radio Times finds one twist too many in an otherwise rewarding film, while Variety argues that the intrigue becomes messy and the conclusion confusing.

Empire
27 October 2006 · Dan Jolin
85*

The critic praises Nolan's intricate, non-linear storytelling and masterful adaptation of the novel, noting the film's beautiful convolutions and the strong, complex performances from the leads that maintain sympathy throughout the rivalry.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
20 October 2006 · Kenneth Turan
85*

The film is an adult, provocative piece of work that becomes a magic trick in itself through its romance with illusion. It mixes genres in a heady blend with high-order filmmaking that impresses and entertains despite being almost too tricky.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Brian Pendreigh
80

Nolan constructs a fascinating, twisty tale grounded by fine performances and serious treatment of the material, though the slightly overbaked dénouement has one twist too many.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
20 October 2006 · A.O. Scott
80*

The film is an intricate, elaborate machine for diversion with a puzzlelike structure and generous showmanship. It is a triumph of gimmickry that prioritizes ingenuity of conceit and skill of execution over substance.

Read the full review →
Total Film
10 November 2006
80*

The critic highlights Nolan's assured direction and the film's intricate, psychologically deep take on magic and rivalry, calling it a stylish and truthful exploration that delivers a spectacular reveal.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
20 October 2006 · B · Scott Tobias
77

Praises the intricate plotting and twists but notes it lacks emotional resonance, feeling like an entertaining but hollow diversion.

Read the full review →
Time Out
7 November 2006 · Ben Walters
60*

Nolan's period picture about rival magicians is handsome and features strong performances from Jackman and Bale, but it is hampered by a structural Catch-22 that spoils the magic by revealing too much too slowly.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
16 October 2006 · Kirk Honeycutt
55*

The critic finds the film cleverly executed with strong production values but criticizes its lack of emotional depth and heart due to the calculating, obsessed characters.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
16 October 2006 · Nick Schager
40*

Acknowledges the robust performances and clever structure but criticizes the film for being gimmicky, lacking emotional engagement, and prioritizing spectacle over substance.

Read the full review →
Variety
13 October 2006 · festival review · Dennis Harvey
40*

The film goes from middling to messy at its denouement with high polish but so-so character involvement and a confusing conclusion. Complicated intrigue overwhelms the adaptation, leading to a flame-out that will perplex most viewers.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 December 2006 · Graham Fuller

The film offers engaging bafflement through its protagonists' experiences and a skilfully structured non-linear screenplay with an ambitious subtext. It praises the charismatic performances, especially Christian Bale's, and Wally Pfister's camerawork in the Gothic scenes.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
12 November 2006 · Peter Bradshaw

The critic praises Nolan's follow-up to Memento as a dazzling, gripping and intellectually exciting work about rival magicians. They single out the immaculate production design, editing, photography and the complementary performances of Bale and Jackman for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
13 November 2006 · Daniel Saney

Nolan improves upon the source novel with a more streamlined, focused adaptation centered on the magicians' rivalry. The film succeeds through cinematic sleight-of-hand that misdirects the audience for a rewarding payoff at the reveal.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
6 November 2006 · Chris

The critic praises Nolan's sinister sleight of hand in recreating Victorian London and forcing close attention to every frame, much like Memento. The film is called a clever piece of entertainment that plays on the desire to be fooled by magic.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate