Film review

The Prestige

2006 · Directed by Christopher Nolan · 2h 10m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceTwo magicians go to considerable trouble to avoid saying well done

DramaMysteryScience Fiction

In Victorian London, Robert Angier (Hugh Jackman) and Alfred Borden (Christian Bale) compete as magicians, each preoccupied with the other’s work. Their rivalry turns the pursuit of a convincing illusion into an obsession, with consequences beyond the stage. Christopher Nolan’s adaptation of Christopher Priest’s novel moves backwards and forwards through their story, following the competition and the secrets behind their performances. Michael Caine plays Cutter, alongside Rebecca Hall as Sarah and Scarlett Johansson as Olivia Wenscombe. The film combines drama, mystery and science fiction as the two men try to understand what the other can do.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Christopher Nolan’s The Prestige makes professional jealousy gripping, with Hugh Jackman and Christian Bale giving its elaborate plotting a human cost. The explanations become fussy, but the rivalry earns the attention the film demands.

The Prestige is a gripping film about professional envy, with enough feeling in its rivalry to make the elaborate storytelling worth following. Christopher Nolan treats stage magic seriously, as work that requires skill, secrecy and a willingness to let somebody else misunderstand what is happening. That gives him a useful way to organise a mystery. The complicated plotting could easily become tiresome, but Hugh Jackman and Christian Bale make this competition worth caring about.

The screenplay by Christopher and Jonathan Nolan, adapted from Christopher Priest’s novel, moves backwards and forwards through the rivalry rather than laying it out in order. Editor Lee Smith keeps those shifts brisk enough to sustain the competition’s urgency. We have to revise our judgement of the men as well as keep track of events. For much of the film, that demands the right amount of effort, giving us enough to follow without making every connection on our behalf.

Jackman’s Robert Angier and Bale’s Alfred Borden give the competition two distinct temperaments. Jackman lets charm coexist with an ugly need to prevail, while Bale’s severity gives Borden little room to enjoy his own ability. We were unsettled by how recognisable their resentment became: both performances make it clear how much these men hate being outdone. The actors keep enough vulnerability visible for us to care, even when spending time with either man begins to feel like a poor decision.

Wally Pfister’s photography makes the Gothic settings oppressive, encouraging us to examine the image for what we might have missed. It is an effective way to keep the eye busy while the screenplay moves between different points in the rivalry. Nathan Crowley’s production design makes Victorian London convincing without competing with the actors for our interest. We believe in the surroundings, which matters when the story is asking us to keep doubting what we see.

David Julyan’s music helps sustain that unease without making the rivalry seem grander than it deserves. Its seriousness suits men who have lost the ability to see anything faintly ridiculous in their competition. Michael Caine, as Cutter, supplies a welcome steadiness beside the leads’ intensity. His calmer performance gives us a brief rest from their resentment, which the film needs.

The weakness lies in the screenplay’s appetite for explanation. Christopher and Jonathan Nolan sometimes labour a connection after the actors and the editing have given us enough to grasp it. The later stretches grow fussy, and the insistence on accounting for the puzzle interrupts the interest in how these men behave. A little less clarification would leave more room for the discomfort the performances have earned.

As a mystery, The Prestige rewards close attention, and its treatment of rivalry makes the cleverness matter. The complaints about emotional distance are understandable, given how jealously Angier and Borden guard themselves, but we found enough hurt in the performances to stay involved. At 130 minutes, it asks for concentration without needing an apology for its length. Watch it with someone who can tolerate a conversation being postponed until the credits.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

68
Positive
6
Mixed
2
Negative
2

Most critics respond favourably to The Prestige, with praise centred on Nolan’s intricate, non-linear storytelling and the performances of Bale and Jackman. The rivalry gives the elaborate plotting a firm centre, while the period setting and polished filmmaking help sustain the illusion. Supporters find the film absorbing and enjoy being misdirected; even several less enthusiastic reviews acknowledge the strength of the acting and the care of the construction.

The spread is wide, however, and the main disagreement concerns how much feeling survives all that ingenuity. Some critics find psychological depth in the rivalry; others see calculating characters whose obsessions offer little emotional involvement. The final stretch also divides opinion, earning praise for its payoff and complaints about excess complication. Radio Times finds one twist too many in an otherwise rewarding film, while Variety argues that the intrigue becomes messy and the conclusion confusing.

Empire
27 October 2006 · Dan Jolin
85*

The critic praises Nolan's intricate, non-linear storytelling and masterful adaptation of the novel, noting the film's beautiful convolutions and the strong, complex performances from the leads that maintain sympathy throughout the rivalry.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
20 October 2006 · Kenneth Turan
85*

The film is an adult, provocative piece of work that becomes a magic trick in itself through its romance with illusion. It mixes genres in a heady blend with high-order filmmaking that impresses and entertains despite being almost too tricky.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Brian Pendreigh
80

Nolan constructs a fascinating, twisty tale grounded by fine performances and serious treatment of the material, though the slightly overbaked dénouement has one twist too many.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
20 October 2006 · A.O. Scott
80*

The film is an intricate, elaborate machine for diversion with a puzzlelike structure and generous showmanship. It is a triumph of gimmickry that prioritizes ingenuity of conceit and skill of execution over substance.

Read the full review →
Total Film
10 November 2006
80*

The critic highlights Nolan's assured direction and the film's intricate, psychologically deep take on magic and rivalry, calling it a stylish and truthful exploration that delivers a spectacular reveal.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
20 October 2006 · B · Scott Tobias
77

Praises the intricate plotting and twists but notes it lacks emotional resonance, feeling like an entertaining but hollow diversion.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 2007

Nominated
Best Cinematography
Nominated
Best Production Design

If you liked this, try…

Amadeus poster

Amadeus

1984 · For professional envy made painfully human, with room for the music.

Sleuth poster

Sleuth

1972 · Another contest between men who mistake humiliating an opponent for winning.

Diabolique poster

Diabolique

1955 · For patient misdirection and the suspicion that somebody knows more than they admit.

The Handmaiden poster

The Handmaiden

2016 · For elaborate deception whose emotional consequences matter as much as its mechanics.

Perfect Blue poster82

Perfect Blue

1997 · Another unsettling puzzle about performance, identity and the strain of being watched.