Critics’ reviews

The Spy Who Loved Me (1977)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 74: 7 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Spy Who Loved Me

74
Positive
7
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics take this as the high point of Roger Moore’s run, and the praise clusters around the same things: Moore’s deadpan, the scale of the set-pieces, and a heroine treated as his equal rather than his prize. The pre-credits ski jump, the Lotus that turns into a submarine and Richard Kiel’s Jaws come up in nearly every notice, and several reviews argue the film plays its Bond staples straight enough to stay clear of camp. Ken Adam’s sets and Claude Renoir’s photography draw approval even from the less enthusiastic.

The reservations are about the writing. Sight and Sound finds the plot barely coherent, a string of borrowed set-pieces held together by seaside innuendo, and Time Out goes further, calling the flag-waving and schoolboy smut desperately weak and sparing only Jaws. Variety sits between the camps, enjoying the props while conceding the story is comic-strip parody. The spread is wide: seven critics rate it warmly, but the two dissenters are not mild about it.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Freer
90*

Roger Moore’s third Bond outing is his best and a terrifically entertaining adventure that plays all the Bond staples without tipping into camp. The critic singles out Ken Adam’s brilliant sets, the gripping action sequences including the iconic ski chase and submarine car, and Jaws as a memorable henchman for praise.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
3 August 2017 · Brian Doan
90*

The film is a triumph of absurdity and the best of the Roger Moore Bonds, excelling through its playful style, visual flair, and Moore's witty deadpan performance amid the spectacle of gadgetry and stunts.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
24 May 2017 · William Carroll
80*

Moore cemented his reputation as the most charming and exciting Bond in this series highlight, turning the character into someone audiences could laugh at as well as admire. The critic singles out Moore's self-aware performance, innuendo, costumes and chemistry with Q and Anya Amasova for praise.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

Roger Moore excels in this big-budget adventure with a welcome accent on character rather than just spectacle. The critic singles out the pre-credits ski-jump stunt and Carly Simon's theme song for praise.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1976 · Variety Staff
70*

Story and characters serve comic-strip parody, spotlighting props, sets, stunts, and spectacle such as the Lotus car that converts to an underwater craft and the gimmick villain Jaws.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
50*

The film continues the Bond formula with seaside-postcard smut and comic-strip feats, but narrative coherence is disregarded in favour of derivative set-pieces. Claude Renoir's visuals are often easy on the eye.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · CPe
40*

This Bond entry pushes the myth of British technological wizardry with patriotic flagwaving, pre-pubescent sexuality and puerile innuendoes; it has its moments with Kiel's Jaws but the rest is desperately weak.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
7 July 2018 · Max Williams
85*

The critic hails it as the best of the epic Bond films, a fun-filled globetrotting adventure with an iconic opening, standout henchman Jaws, and the Lotus submarine car. They single out the film's sheer entertainment value and strong heroine Anya Amasova for praise, while noting minor flaws like the villain's lack of depth.

Read the full review →
Film Stories
16 June 2022 · Mark Harrison
85*

The critic celebrates the film as a workplace romantic comedy that pairs Bond with an equal in KGB agent Anya Amasova. The piece singles out the fun, flirty dynamic between the leads and the film's humorous tone for particular praise.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate