Critics’ reviews

The Sting (1973)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 85: 10 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Sting

85
Positive
10
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics greet The Sting as a witty, good-natured con comedy whose pleasures depend on careful craft. Praise clusters around Newman and Redford’s rapport, the intricate screenplay and George Roy Hill’s controlled direction. The reviews repeatedly credit the chaptered storytelling and elaborate swindle with keeping the entertainment lively, while the 1930s settings and Scott Joplin music contribute much of its charm. For most critics, the polish is central to the pleasure of watching the scheme unfold.

Reservations concern length and how much warmth lies beneath that professionalism. Eye for Film enjoys the performances and direction but finds that the film occasionally drags. Time Out offers the clearest dissent, admiring the period detail while finding the familiar formula somewhat soulless. The spread is largely between enthusiasm and qualified enjoyment: most critics welcome the calculated construction, while a minority find it overextended or emotionally thin.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · John Ferguson
100

The reteaming of Butch Cassidy stars Newman and Redford with director Hill proved a glorious triumph that won seven Oscars. The real pleasure comes from the chemistry between the two leads, the lovingly created 1930s settings and Marvin Hamlisch's inspired reworking of Scott Joplin's music.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
27 December 1973 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The critic calls it one of the most stylish movies of the year and praises its light-fingered, witty con-game plot executed with off-balance pacing and oblique visuals.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2011 · William Thomas
90*

The critic calls George Roy Hill the real king of the comedy crime caper for turning the slick script into one of cinema’s sassiest films, praising the episodic structure, Redford and Newman’s sizzling charisma, and the iconic ragtime soundtrack. It concludes that everything good about Hollywood fell into place at the right time, making it magnificent and timeless.

Read the full review →
The Independent
7 June 2012
85*

The critic describes it as a hugely enjoyable con-man caper from 1973 that reprises the chemistry between Redford and Newman from Butch Cassidy. It singles out the terrific Scott Joplin score, exquisite cameos and elegantly played-out sting for praise.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
1 January 2015 · Patrick Smith
85*

The film is the definitive con artist comedy and a crafty, good-natured crime caper that surpasses the duo's earlier collaboration. It excels through its complex swindle, period detail, snappy script, and sleek direction with chapter headings.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
13 June 2012 · B+ · Scott Tobias
83

The critic calls it a model of old-school craft and a broadly appealing entertainment that runs like a top in an era of auteur-driven turbulence. The silky-smooth mechanics of the screenplay and direction are singled out as the primary allure, along with the effortless Scott Joplin score.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
26 December 1973 · Vincent Canby
80*

The critic finds the film good-natured and charming as a con game about exuberant 1930s confidence men, forgiving its efforts to charm despite some loose period details.

Read the full review →
The Times
10 December 2005 · Stephen Dalton
80*

The biggest grossing film of 1973 reunites the successful team for a convoluted scam in 1930s Chicago. Three decades on, it still bounces along with an irresistible, roguish swagger.

Read the full review →
Time Out
25 February 2015 · CPe
60*

Hill's follow-up to Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid sticks to the same proven box-office formula with Newman and Redford as conmen in 1930s Chicago. It is all very professional with fine attention to period detail, but a bit soulless.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound

This is the most elaborate heist film to date, with an outrageously jokey and calculated finale. It is a thoroughly old-fashioned, professional entertainment that is a little overlong but sufficiently well written and played, with real pleasures in its sheer physical beauty and rich re-creation of a Thirties milieu.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
4 June 2012 · ★★★★★ · Dave Roper
100

The review praises the flawless screenplay, strong characterization, rapport between Newman and Redford, and calls it an intelligent, witty and enjoyable con movie.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
7 November 2005 · Trash Fletcher
70*

The critic finds the film an enjoyable con tale with outrageous and entertaining characters, praising the performances of Newman and Redford and the direction, but complains about its length and occasional dragging.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate