The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (2026)

The critic finds the film a fun, family-oriented animated sequel that explores sibling dynamics among the Mario brothers and their friends. It singles out the remarkably beautiful animation by Illumination, which stays true to the 8-bit source material while feeling deeply cinematic.

The critic finds the film an improvement over the first but still absolute rubbish, feeling like one long advert full of shameless product placement. They single out the thin plot and corporate nature for complaint.

The sequel overwhelms with frantic pace, bright colors, and endless subplots in a kaleidoscopic but nerve-wracking experience that fails to land as fun. Attempts at family themes are superficial and corporate, though it will likely succeed commercially with young audiences.

The film is a humourless, hysterical trudge with very little plot or consequence, offering adults only a few pings of nostalgia amid frenetic but pointless action. The critic singles out the lack of humour and memorable moments for complaint, noting it fails to deliver laughs or engaging storytelling even for fans.

The critic calls the film an inert, visually dull sequel and an Easter cash grab that feels even more artificial than AI-generated content. They single out the lack of humor and the generic quest plot for criticism.

The critic describes the film as supremely vacuous and physically painful to watch, a lifeless digital marketing exercise. They single out the joyless voice performances and meaningless plot for complaint.

Illumination turns the creative 2007 game into a mind-numbing barrage of references, cameos, and franchise expansions with little imagination. The result feels like empty franchise slop rather than a genuine adaptation.

The film treats its audience like babies by flooding the screen with sensory overload, baby characters, and shallow Nintendo iconography while ignoring story, logic, or substance. It prioritizes fan-service cameos and visual thrills over any meaningful engagement.

The sequel is a relentlessly fast-paced, hyperkinetic visual spectacle packed with more action, characters, and Easter eggs than the first film. It delights young fans and nostalgic viewers with its starry voice cast and sugary animation but offers little for adult non-fans.

The critic finds it a fun sequel full of nostalgic references, all-star voices and epic animation. They single out Donald Glover’s Yoshi and the father-son redemption story for Bowser as highlights.

The review calls the film a charming, often hilarious, and playful testament to the Mario franchise and Nintendo history, with fun references and strong casting that work for both fans and newcomers. It notes that the story is thin and some new characters are underserved in the overstuffed sequel.

The critic finds the sequel less focused than the first film, relying on nostalgia, dazzling visuals, and references to carry a paper-thin plot while expanding the universe with new characters who get too little to do. It singles out the charming cameos and action sequences featuring obscure Mario villains as highlights amid the candy-coated chaos.

The critic finds the film cute and entertaining on the surface for kids but ultimately shallow and lifeless compared to the predecessor, with a simple plot, phoned-in performances, and references that don't add depth. They single out the visual style and some clever moments for minor praise but criticize the lack of soul and substance.

The critic calls the film lazy junk with no imagination that barely tells a story and wastes time. They single out its terrified avoidance of any creative deviation or cinematic risk as the main complaint.