Critics’ reviews

The Sweet Hereafter (1997)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 88: 6 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of The Sweet Hereafter

88
Positive
6
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are strongly positive, with praise centred on Egoyan’s restrained handling of grief and the performances that give it emotional force. Most critics find that the fragmented chronology deepens the account of a community living with loss, rather than keeping its pain at a distance. Ian Holm draws particular praise, while Sarah Polley and the wider ensemble also receive attention. The adaptation is repeatedly credited with preserving complexity without resorting to melodrama.

The spread is narrow, and differences concern emphasis more than approval. Some critics stress the moral questions surrounding the lawyer’s intervention; others focus on the film’s tenderness and interest in recovery. Time Out offers a specific reservation: its sensitive treatment of grief, guilt and anger may not yield fresh insights into how tragedy changes a community. That qualification sits alongside praise for its performances, editing, photography and atmosphere.

RogerEbert.com
23 December 1997 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The film is a tender, unflinching lament for survivors of grief after a school bus accident kills 14 children in a small town. Ebert praises Egoyan's non-linear structure and Ian Holm's subtle performance as the lawyer who mirrors the parents' loss.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 March 2002 · Keith Phipps
90*

The critic calls the film Egoyan's best work yet and one of the best of the year. They single out its detached nonlinear style for movingly and truthfully exploring themes of loss and recovery.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
3 October 1997 · festival review · Janet Maslin
90*

Egoyan's wrenching adaptation of Russell Banks' novel uses the bus accident as the basis for a moral inquiry into how a town copes with loss and a lawyer's self-serving intervention. Maslin highlights the film's fragmented narrative and haunting images.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
21 November 1997 · Kenneth Turan
85*

The film is a delicate, assured exploration of tragedy's impact on families, suffused with stately restraint and silences that amplify its emotional power. Turan praises Egoyan's adaptation of the novel and its focus on healing amid loss.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
17 November 1997 · Daphne Merkin
85*

Egoyan's sober adaptation excels as one of the best book-to-film translations, with Ian Holm's volcanic performance anchoring the story of grief and a lawsuit in a rural community. Merkin singles out the restraint and strong ensemble, especially Sarah Polley.

Read the full review →
Variety
16 May 1997 · festival review · Brendan Kelly
80*

Egoyan's most ambitious work is a rich, complex meditation on a small town's response to tragedy, retaining unconventional style while gaining emotional weight. Kelly notes the skillful avoidance of melodrama and strong performances from the ensemble.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas

The critic highlights the film's humane, insightful and extremely moving treatment of painful subject matter. It is noted for tactful acting, beautiful snowy widescreen cinematography and subtle scripting and direction.

Read the full review →
The Independent
12 September 2013

The critic calls it a masterpiece that plays the tragic tale relatively straight. It is praised as a bold, immensely moving adaptation of Russell Banks's novel.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · GA

This is Egoyan's warmest and most conventional film to date, despite its sophisticated fragmented narrative. It is beautifully performed, edited and shot, sensitive in its treatment of grief, guilt and anger, and strong on atmosphere, though it may not offer fresh insights into how a community is changed by tragedy.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate