Critics’ reviews

The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (1974)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 81: 11 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of The Texas Chain Saw Massacre

81
Positive
11
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics find The Texas Chain Saw Massacre an intensely effective horror film, with eleven of the twelve reviews positive. Praise centres on Tobe Hooper’s documentary-style realism and the use of sound, editing and framing to sustain dread. Several reviews stress how much violence is suggested rather than shown, crediting the grimy surroundings and oppressive atmosphere with making anticipation as distressing as the attacks themselves.

The differences concern what that terror achieves, and whether its relentlessness is enough. Some critics read the film as a response to industrial decline and American social anxiety; others admire it chiefly as a precisely staged exercise in fright, with occasional gallows humour. The lone negative review, at RogerEbert.com, acknowledges the technical skill and effective performances but finds little purpose beyond disgust and fear. That dissent leaves a broad positive consensus with a sharp disagreement over whether accomplished horror needs any further justification.

Slant Magazine
24 May 2003 · ★★★★/4 · Eric Henderson
100

The critic praises the film's anarchic gallows humor and its evocation of Vietnam-era social dread through a cannibal family narrative. He singles out the juxtaposition of horror and comedy, along with the suggestive power of its grimy, verité style over explicit gore.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
95*

The most purely horrifying horror movie ever made. Hooper's sick, inventive film remains as disturbing, suspenseful and shattering as ever, with horror scenes staged with unforgettable force using the soundtrack and unsettling details.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
5 out of 5 stars · Alan Jones
90*

The critic describes it as a seminal classic whose shock value has not dimmed. They single out Hooper’s masterful use of documentary-style realism combined with the horror of anticipation and suggestion.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
13 August 2024 · Jackson Arn
85*

Fifty years on, the film reads like sociology about how assembly lines, technology, and unemployment derange the working class and leave them hungry, with killing and family loyalty intertwined. It praises the film's tautness, visual beauty in decay, and haunting quality over mere scares.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
11 October 2024 · Robbie Collin
85*

The piece presents the film as a shoestring slasher and masterful critique of post-industrial capitalism that transformed horror cinema, establishing the final girl trope while drawing on real-world influences like Ed Gein. It praises the editing, documentary-like quality, and inimitable impact that still resonates 50 years later.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
18 November 1976 · Derek Malcolm
80*

The critic finds the film a formidable piece of directorial artifice and a minor tour de force, a horror comic brought to the screen with frenetic energy. It effectively plants most of the violence in the audience's minds and delivers sweat-inducing sequences that lead the imagination without pretending to be anything more than a scare.

Read the full review →
Time Out
21 September 2024 · 5 out of 5 stars · Tom Huddleston
70*

The critic calls it a punishingly literal horror that retains its single-minded power decades later. They single out the sheer relentlessness of the chase scenes and the rancid dinner scene for creating an oppressive, skin-crawling sense of inhuman nastiness.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 January 1974 · Variety Staff
70*

Despite heavy gore, Tobe Hooper's film is well-made for an exploiter of its type, with a professional look, skillful dolly shots, sharp composition, and acting above par for the genre. It notes the thin color but highlights the atmospheric effects and detail.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
1 January 1974 · Roger Ebert
30*

The film is a grisly, violent Grand Guignol exercise in terror with no apparent purpose beyond creating disgust and fright, yet it is technically well-made, well-acted, and effective in its own weird way. The critic gives grudging admiration to the craft and performances but finds the movie unnecessary overall.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
21 April 2023 · ★★★★★ · Sam Inglis
100

The critic calls the film a pure masterpiece and the most finely tuned dread machine in cinema history. They single out its deceptive use of implication and atmosphere over explicit gore, particularly in sequences like the intense family dinner scene.

Read the full review →
Collider
11 October 2024 · 9/10 · Kelcie Mattson
90

The film is a haunting and unflinching horror masterpiece worthy of its acclaim. The critic praises its documentary-style camerawork, minimal score, and production design that create a haunting mood, along with the way it emphasizes atmosphere and psychological violence over explicit gore.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
1 October 2019 · Ryan Lambie
90*

The critic celebrates the film's raw power and timeless horror achieved through low-budget ingenuity and intense atmosphere, singling out its use of sound, editing, and framing over gore, and its unflinching depiction of fear in 1970s America. The piece highlights how the difficult production contributed to the movie's authentic terror.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate