Critics’ reviews

The Thin Red Line (1998)

8 reviews from 8 publications. We need six from publications we count before we show a critics’ score; there are 4 so far.

Back to our review of The Thin Red Line

4 of 6
Positive
2
Mixed
2
Negative
0
Empire
1 January 2003 · William Thomas
90*

A major work from a major artist that reaches beyond entertainment to touch the profound; a glorious return for Malick after 20 years.

Read the full review →
Total Film
5 March 1999
85*

A totally engrossing film, a near free-form essay in texture and ideas that grips despite being narrative-free; Malick's return will go down as one of the finest films of the year.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
26 February 1999
60*

The critic describes Malick's poetic adaptation as a singular war film that defies simple appraisal, being in equal parts earthy and high-flown. It is touched by brilliance but sometimes feels like a pious, wishy-washy folly.

Read the full review →
The Independent
25 February 1999
60*

The film is rambling and incoherent in places but luminously beautiful and ambitious; Malick has created an introspective war movie unlike any other.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· Gavin Smith

The critic praises the film as a unique lyric epic poem on war that balances romanticism and dispassion while evading mythic spectacle, unlike Saving Private Ryan. It singles out the film's use of light, voiceover, and Witt's transcendent perspective for conveying the duality of horror and rapture in existence.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· Geoffrey Macnab

Malick's first film in 20 years is a personal, poetic vision of war as messy and absurd, with random shifts in mood, breathtaking beauty and metaphysical inquiry. It succeeds as an utterly personal big-budget war film thanks to its imagery and voiceovers, though some characters are reduced to sketches.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA

Malick's masterpiece is an extraordinary, profoundly rich war movie and mythic pantheist meditation on conflict, violence and death in nature. Its multiple voice-overs, flora and fauna imagery, and central metaphor of paradise lost make it a genuinely epic ciné-poem.

Read the full review →
Variety
20 December 1998 · Todd McCarthy

The film is a complex, highly talented work with intellectual and philosophical ambitions that will captivate some critics and serious viewers, but its abstract nature, emotional remoteness and lack of dramatic focus will frustrate mainstream audiences. It presents a worldly paradise devastated by man’s irrepressible impulse to destroy, realized through ravishing visuals and extensive voiceover commentaries.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate